On 8/9/2012 8:23 PM, anon wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 00:35:37 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/8/2012 4:11 PM, anon wrote:
Yet another obscure error message that makes no sense.
I suspect it's the ( ) you have in the file names.
I suspect you ought to fix your linker. "Program Files
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
Summary: Float types default initializers doesn't work in class
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
On Friday, 10 August 2012 at 09:27:25 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
Summary: Float types default initializers doesn't
work in class
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8530
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Kozak 2012-08-10 03:19:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> If you want to check for NaN, then use std.math.isNaN. As I understand it,
> there is no guarantee that two NaN values have the same bit pattern (at
> minim
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8531
Summary: formatting string documentation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Phobos
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
Summary: Pure Segfault
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
AssignedTo: no
On Friday, 10 August 2012 at 08:02:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 8/9/2012 8:23 PM, anon wrote:
On Thursday, 9 August 2012 at 00:35:37 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/8/2012 4:11 PM, anon wrote:
Yet another obscure error message that makes no sense.
I suspect it's the ( ) you have in the fil
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8533
Summary: Postfix and prefix declarations of static
multidimensional arrays aren't equivalent
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8533
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8533
--- Comment #2 from fataler...@trash-mail.com 2012-08-10 11:30:16 PDT ---
Oh, yes it was an oversight on my side, sorry.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
On 8/10/2012 2:30 AM, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Problematic code:
Replying to bug reports in the newsgroup generally means your reply will be
overlooked. Please reply on bugzilla.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8534
Summary: mixed-in struct definition not forward referenceable
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8535
Summary: perfectly valid uncidoe chars give: "Unsupported char
xxx"
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8535
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Olshansky 2012-08-10
14:20:05 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1137)
tables with "wrong" chars
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail beca
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8535
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8536
Summary: OPTLINK crash with large fixed-size array
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8536
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8536
--- Comment #2 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-08-10 19:43:48 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1138)
Three C programs that show one effect of static 2D arrays
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8536
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-08-10 19:49:18 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is a well known Optlink bug, though I don't have the bugzilla number
> handy.
OK.
> You're wrong about it impeding optimizations compared w
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=481
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-08-10 20:03:23 PDT ---
A bug I've just found. Originally I was using 20 points, and I needed them in a
fixed-size array. Later I have removed some of them to reduce the testing time,
but I have for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8536
--- Comment #4 from Walter Bright 2012-08-10
20:51:43 PDT ---
Your test is incorrectly written.
Use one array, not an array of arrays, and use a macro to compute the r*row+c
index.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userp
22 matches
Mail list logo