https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
Bartosz Milewski bart...@relisoft.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
--- Comment #5 from nick.barbal...@gmail.com 2009-05-07 03:11 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Because your solution doesn't solve even your problem.
Perhaps you would like to propose a better solution ?
My original request was have
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
--- Comment #4 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-05-05 06:09 ---
Because your solution doesn't solve even your problem.
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
ma...@pochta.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-04-02 07:50 ---
This guy wants gc to free unmanaged resources each 10 seconds, because if gc
objects, wrapping those resources, don't occupy much space, gc won't bother to
collect garbage.
The I suggest creating
== Quote from Sean Kelly (s...@invisibleduck.org)'s article
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from ma...@pochta.ru 2009-04-02 07:50 ---
This guy wants gc to free unmanaged resources each 10 seconds, because if
gc
objects, wrapping those resources, don't occupy much
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2757
--- Comment #1 from bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-03-27 03:38 ---
What is the enhancement request?
--
