[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2833

Andrei Alexandrescu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|2.027   |D2

--


[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-07-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833


Andreas Jung  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #6 from Andreas Jung   2009-07-06 
12:40:27 PDT ---
Looks like resolved in DMD 2.031.

Probably related to Issue 3114.

-- 
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---


[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-04-13 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833





--- Comment #5 from webmas...@aj-productions.de  2009-04-13 03:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (WTF it's completely unnecessary to put
> all these corporate trademark tags in a bug report ;)

I was just giving the full CPU name string from the genuine(TM) Windows Control
panel.


(In reply to comment #4)
> IIRC oplink is threaded and might have CPU count detection so it might have a
> bug for >2 cores. It's old enough that it might never have been tested on 4
> cores.

When I link using "link.exe" instead of "dmd.exe", it returns 0, so the origin
of the problem is in "dmd.exe".

dmd.exe  -g -debug-IC:\dmd\src\phobos  -c hello.d -ofobj\debug\hello.obj
echo %errorlevel%
link.exe obj\debug\hello.obj
echo %errorlevel%

(both return 0)


-- 



[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-04-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833





--- Comment #4 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu  2009-04-12 22:36 ---

IIRC oplink is threaded and might have CPU count detection so it might have a
bug for >2 cores. It's old enough that it might never have been tested on 4
cores.


-- 



[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-04-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833





--- Comment #3 from 2kor...@gmail.com  2009-04-12 19:28 ---
FWIW, I have Windows 7 and Core 2 Duo. DMD always returns 0.


-- 



[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-04-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833


unkn...@simplemachines.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||unkn...@simplemachines.org




--- Comment #2 from unkn...@simplemachines.org  2009-04-12 19:04 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Did you consider that it might not be because you're using an Intel(TM)
> Co(R)re(SM) 2(all rights reserved) Quad(WTF it's completely unnecessary to put
> all these corporate trademark tags in a bug report ;) ) and more because one
> system is Vista and the other is XP?

Well, it seems isolated to quad core.  I have tested on the Core 2 Duo I use,
and it works fine.  I'm running Vista.  I just don't have a quad available to
me.

I'm not sure that safe mode has anything to do with anything, but it's telling
that this is only reproducible when the async code is #define'd on, and only on
a quad core machine.

Keep in mind, on Windows, the return code of dmd.exe is the return code from
link.exe.  For this reason, it's unclear to me what could be happening.  The
problem is not in link.exe.

-[Unknown]


-- 



[Issue 2833] DMD returns -1073741819 on Intel Quadcore

2009-04-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2833





--- Comment #1 from jarrett.billings...@gmail.com  2009-04-12 18:50 ---
Did you consider that it might not be because you're using an Intel(TM)
Co(R)re(SM) 2(all rights reserved) Quad(WTF it's completely unnecessary to put
all these corporate trademark tags in a bug report ;) ) and more because one
system is Vista and the other is XP?

I've tested on my XP installs on my laptop (Pentium M) and my desktop (Core 2,
but in 32-bit mode) and it gives 0 for both.


--