http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #9 from yebblies 2011-06-09 08:40:44 PDT ---
*** Issue 5518 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-18 03:23:38 PDT ---
Given the way templates work in D, the original code can't work, but I'd like
to receive the error line number here.
This problem is a good example to show the difference be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@metalanguage.com
--- Comm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #5 from David Simcha 2010-08-17 18:40:32 PDT ---
No, I'm saying that since the lambda function is bound at compile time, this
isn't a bug. It's an intentional design tradeoff. It **can't** be fixed
unless the lambda function is bo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #4 from Brad Roberts 2010-08-17 17:46:40 PDT
---
You're miring your logic in the implementation rather than the concept of what
map is. Pretend it was implemented as:
T[] map(T)(mapfunc, T[]);
would we even be having this discus
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic
Summary|Array of l
