[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2013-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #20 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-04-07 00:30:05 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/312 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2013-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #21 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2013-04-07 00:36:10 PDT --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/312 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2013-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2013-04-07 Thread d-bugmail
-language.org/commit/e65e5ebf90834cb5590aa95a886b515db03d94be fix Issue 6024 - Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported? https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/commit/8b0d9ea28a7aaffe88a8ace5545cc0ae342af11e Merge pull request #312 from WalterBright

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-10-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-07-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-07-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-05-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #16 from Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com 2012-05-12 10:01:09 MSD --- A pull for Windows 2000 support: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/212 -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-04-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-04-27 17:04:29 PDT --- I would note that with 2.059, we removed support for Windows 9x. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-02-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|All |x86

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-02-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #14 from Yao Gomez yao.go...@gmail.com 2012-02-06 18:18:59 PST --- Sorry, it was a 'misplaced tab in Opera' (I opened the wrong link :) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-01-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #12 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2012-01-21 00:56:37 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Can calling RtlCaptureContext simply be bypassed if the program is running on Win2K? RtlCaptureContext is non-essential

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2012-01-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #11 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2012-01-20 22:09:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) Jonathan, After quickly patching out RtlCaptureContext, Can calling RtlCaptureContext simply be bypassed if the program is

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-07-20 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 twk twkr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||twkr...@gmail.com --- Comment

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #4 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2011-05-17 12:12:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) It looks like the RtlCaptureContext call can be replaced with some simple assembler. All it needs is the contents of the EIP, EBP

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-05-17 12:21:10 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) It looks like the RtlCaptureContext call can be replaced with some simple assembler. All it

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-05-17 12:55:58 PDT --- None of the Windows system function calls that std.datetime uses existed prior to Win2K Pro. So, if you use SysTime with either LocalTime (which is the

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-05-17 13:02:52 PDT --- Jonathan, A while ago Microsoft updated the minimum supported Windows version fields in MSDN to only go back as far as Windows 2000. Thus, do not rely

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2011-05-17 13:12:57 PDT --- Well, all I have to go on is the documentation, and it says Win2K pro. I have no idea if any of them work prior to that, and if they don't, then there's no

[Issue 6024] Windows 2000 SP4 is not supported any more? And what is still supported?

2011-05-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6024 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com 2011-05-17 13:18:21 PDT --- Jonathan, After quickly patching out RtlCaptureContext, I checked and std.datetime unittests start just fine on Windows 98. However, the unit tests