[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2013-03-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #10 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-09-12 13:48:47 PDT --- "Question: if the output of "rdmd --makedepend" is only usable on the current system, is there still a valid use for it? Why not just use rdmd?" Now that I think about it more,

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #9 from Heywood Floyd 2011-09-12 01:32:32 PDT --- Interesting! I can see this is a bit more complex than I thought. I don't know the convention here but as I opened this and all, I thought I'd just say that I'm happy with this bug

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #8 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-09-11 15:18:01 PDT --- "Question: if the output of "rdmd --makedepend" is only usable on the current system, is there still a valid use for it? Why not just use rdmd?" "Using "rdmd --makedepend" to gen

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev 2011-09-11 08:03:09 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Why? Because the list of .d dependencies is *inherently* dependent on the > *specific* compiler, anyway. Question: if the output of "rdmd --makedepe

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #6 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-09-08 15:48:00 PDT --- Sorry, that was pretty long-winded, so let me summarize: I believe the current behavior is correct. Why? Because the list of .d dependencies is *inherently* dependent on the *sp

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #5 from Nick Sabalausky 2011-09-08 15:33:12 PDT --- "(and I'll file an enhancement request for "tell RDMD which DMD to use" if one doesn't already exist)" Here: issue 6628 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/us

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #3 from Heywood Floyd 2011-09-08 05:34:24 PDT --- Ah, I see. Well, that does sound well-meaning. Hm, but, how can rdmd --makedepend claim to know which dmd-binary I'm using in my Makefile? How does it even know I'm going to use dm

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 6622] rdmd --makedepend lists "dmd.conf" and "dmd"

2011-09-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6622 --- Comment #1 from Heywood Floyd 2011-09-08 03:24:24 PDT --- (This is D 2.055) -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---