On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 8:33:47 PM MDT Nathan S. via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> The below writes "uint". Is this working as intended?
> https://run.dlang.io/is/Dx2e7f
>
> ---
> import std.stdio;
>
> auto foo(T = uint)(uint x)
> {
> return T.stringof;
> }
>
> auto foo(T = ulong)(ulong
On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 at 02:33:47 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
The below writes "uint". Is this working as intended?
https://run.dlang.io/is/Dx2e7f
Note that it's called not with a `ulong` literal but with a
`long` literal.
The below writes "uint". Is this working as intended?
https://run.dlang.io/is/Dx2e7f
---
import std.stdio;
auto foo(T = uint)(uint x)
{
return T.stringof;
}
auto foo(T = ulong)(ulong x)
{
return T.stringof;
}
void main()
{
writeln(foo(10L));
}
---
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Qo6BYIZjaoxL_Z0TS9-vAN4ZgbTepkcR
I've reinstalled in other location and rewrite whole example.
I still get optlink error
http://www.digitalmars.com/ctg/optlink.html
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 9:22:26 AM MDT Timoses via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 14:26:44 UTC, Steven
>
> Schveighoffer wrote:
> > [...]
> > As general advice, I wouldn't expect const to work well with
> > Ranges anyway -- const ranges are useless (you can't
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1hC5SZ3VWX0iQoUO7KN0S-743x6FG9ER5
I give up
Cant compile this vibe-d
Ill get back to phobos
On 04.09.2018 22:23, SrMordred wrote:
Most C++ game related projects uses GLM as they default math/vector lib
(even if not using opengl).
In D we have (that I found):
gfm.math - https://github.com/d-gamedev-team/gfm
dlib.math - https://github.com/gecko0307/dlib
Gl3n -
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 19:23:16 UTC, SrMordred wrote:
Most C++ game related projects uses GLM as they default
math/vector lib (even if not using opengl).
In D we have (that I found):
gfm.math - https://github.com/d-gamedev-team/gfm
dlib.math - https://github.com/gecko0307/dlib
Gl3n
Most C++ game related projects uses GLM as they default
math/vector lib (even if not using opengl).
In D we have (that I found):
gfm.math - https://github.com/d-gamedev-team/gfm
dlib.math - https://github.com/gecko0307/dlib
Gl3n - https://github.com/Dav1dde/gl3n
But i'm not sure which
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 14:26:44 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
[...]
As general advice, I wouldn't expect const to work well with
Ranges anyway -- const ranges are useless (you can't iterate
them). So not much code is expecting to handle const, including
the wrappers that Phobos
On 9/4/18 9:53 AM, Timoses wrote:
Hey,
I'm fiddling around with ranges a bit and am wondering why save is not
callable on a const object:
...
I could imagine that save is not marked as const because it is uncertain
whether any indirections are part of the content..? But couldn't the
Hey,
I'm fiddling around with ranges a bit and am wondering why save
is not callable on a const object:
class Range
{
ForwardRange!(const uint) offsets;
this(const S s)
{
this.offsets = s.s.map!(e => e.i).inputRangeObject;
}
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 12:27:47 UTC, nkm1 wrote:
I also had this problem recently. I think aa.require() should
allow to add immutables (feature request). Anyway, my
workaround was along the lines of:
final class AA(Key, Value)
{
Value[] _storage;
size_t[Key] _aa;
void
On 05/09/2018 12:10 AM, Marcin wrote:
""
Am i doing it right?
I've unpacked vibe.d-master to my "C:\D\dtwo\src"
commands in cmd:
cd C:\D\dtwo\windows\bin\
echo "vibe.d-master is a folder"
dmd -lib C:\D\dtwo\src\vibe.d-master\core\vibe\appmain.d
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 11:25:15 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 10:30:24 UTC, Timoses wrote:
However, of course this also fails because randomly assigning
the array elements will overwrite it. So the associative array
seems like the better idea. However, not being
""
Am i doing it right?
I've unpacked vibe.d-master to my "C:\D\dtwo\src"
commands in cmd:
cd C:\D\dtwo\windows\bin\
echo "vibe.d-master is a folder"
dmd -lib C:\D\dtwo\src\vibe.d-master\core\vibe\appmain.d
C:\D\dtwo\src\vibe.d-master\http\vibe\http\server.d
no wai, Ill just paste the
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 10:30:24 UTC, Timoses wrote:
However, of course this also fails because randomly assigning
the array elements will overwrite it. So the associative array
seems like the better idea. However, not being able to
INITIALIZE an assoc array element disallows its
On 04/09/2018 10:57 PM, Marcin wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 07:38:54 UTC, Marcin wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/samples/listener.d
Im using Notepad++ as my IDE cuz i dont have administrator privileges on PC
Coedit is a good option since it is a simple unzip and
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 07:38:54 UTC, Marcin wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/blob/master/samples/listener.d
Im using Notepad++ as my IDE cuz i dont have administrator
privileges on PC
To import modules i use -I option
cmd /k cd C:\D\dtwo\windows\bin\ &
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 at 02:09:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 at 01:23:35 UTC, Patric Dexheimer
wrote:
Why?
Because you'd be overwriting that immutable member. Structs
just put structure around their contents, but it doesn't change
their nature. That struct
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 08:17:14 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
Waiting for this to be merged:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/8437
Well, it seems Andrei has already approved the concept. well,
THAT is a good reason to avoid this paradigm. Thanks for the info.
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 07:06:43 UTC, Dukc wrote:
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 13:34:36 UTC, Andrea Fontana
wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 09:59:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
For me, it seems that for generality you should always add
ref into foreach loop variable. The reason is this:
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 13:34:36 UTC, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Friday, 31 August 2018 at 09:59:20 UTC, Dukc wrote:
For me, it seems that for generality you should always add ref
into foreach loop variable. The reason is this:
One good reason:
On Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 01:33:52 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Monday, 3 September 2018 at 22:07:10 UTC, aliak wrote:
Why does it work with nogc but not with pure?
Cheers,
- Ali
You can't define an impure function inside a pure unittest. If
you move `modify` outside the unittest block,
24 matches
Mail list logo
