On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:22:19 UTC, Joel wrote:
I've ordered a new computer, and it has Mojave OS. It's 64 bit
only, so I'm wondering what difference would that make with
things like with C bindings and stuff.
For example would https://code.dlang.org/packages/dsfml and
On 4/11/19 6:45 PM, Alex wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 19:42:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 4/11/19 2:13 PM, Alex wrote:
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a;
On Friday, 12 April 2019 at 00:02:36 UTC, Seb wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:55:18 UTC, Alex wrote:
to judge people objectively. This isn't a nursery school and
we are not 3 year olds...
Exactly. So start behaving like a grown-up and professional.
When you ask someone for help on
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:55:18 UTC, Alex wrote:
to judge people objectively. This isn't a nursery school and we
are not 3 year olds...
Exactly. So start behaving like a grown-up and professional.
When you ask someone for help on the street, do you curse at him
too?
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 23:04:46 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 22:41:32 UTC, Alex wrote:
Seriously? Do you think you have ESP? Your code isn't even
close to was talking about ;/
Here is is updated that shows the error. You seem to fail to
understand that it
I've ordered a new computer, and it has Mojave OS. It's 64 bit
only, so I'm wondering what difference would that make with
things like with C bindings and stuff.
For example would https://code.dlang.org/packages/dsfml and
https://code.dlang.org/packages/dlangui librarys work?
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 22:41:32 UTC, Alex wrote:
Seriously? Do you think you have ESP? Your code isn't even
close to was talking about ;/
Here is is updated that shows the error. You seem to fail to
understand that it is impossible for it to be my code.
If you continue to attack
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 19:42:05 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 4/11/19 2:13 PM, Alex wrote:
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a; __traits(getAttributes, T)) Attributes
~=
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 20:49:45 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 18:13:48 UTC, Alex wrote:
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a; __traits(getAttributes, T)) Attributes
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 18:13:48 UTC, Alex wrote:
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a; __traits(getAttributes, T)) Attributes ~=
There seems to be absolutely no reason why this code
On 4/11/19 2:13 PM, Alex wrote:
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a; __traits(getAttributes, T)) Attributes ~=
There seems to be absolutely no reason why this code would fail with the
The following code works when I comment out the static if
//static if (__traits(compiles, __traits(getAttributes, T)))
static foreach(a; __traits(getAttributes, T)) Attributes ~=
There seems to be absolutely no reason why this code would fail
with the static if but pass without it but in
On 4/8/19 3:56 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
In this example:
const(AliasSeq!(int, int)) a;
pragma(msg, typeof(a)); // (int, int)
This kind of make sense, since AliasSeq is not a "single" type. But
silently dropping const seems bad, the compiler should probably report
an error/warning in
On 4/10/19 2:52 PM, kdevel wrote:
Recently (before refactoring) my application complained right after
invocation:
object.Error@src/rt/minfo.d(371): Cyclic dependency between module
Filebrowser and App
Filebrowser* ->
App* ->
Filebrowser*
Is it possible to detect this
I want to include subPackages depending either on the presence of
command line options, or the availability of dependencies; think
Gentoo USE flags.
As far as I can tell it's not possible to specify configurations
in a modular way, e.g.
dub --config=withGUI --config=supportGTK
u can use infix function with 1arg without any parentheses.
UPD
with 2args
arg1 `infix func` arg2
latter I told about UFCS with 1arg
`UFCS func` arg1
On Saturday, 2 June 2018 at 22:01:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/02/2018 02:44 PM, greatsam4sure wrote:
> is it possible to define infix function in D
> 3.min(5)// 3: where min is a function, works in D
> 3 min 5 // does not work.
This is called universal function call syntax (UFCS) in D.
Ali
Well, if the code is too complex to debug, the usual solution is
to try simpler code and see if it works.
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 07:56:42 UTC, Julian wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 06:45:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 06:20:05 UTC, Julian wrote:
I don't see a difference in micro-benchmarks. *shrug*
Your enum is int so in machine code it's exactly like
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 06:45:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 06:20:05 UTC, Julian wrote:
Is there a nicer way to have enum array keys in D?
No. I've myself written my own EnumIndexedArray [1] type. It's
pretty simple. Just a couple of operator overload to
On Wednesday, 10 April 2019 at 18:39:23 UTC, Tom wrote:
Total newbie to D, trying to get it to play nice with Neovim
using ncm2-d and DCD.
Issue: DCD never caches any symbols even when I point it
directly to DMD's include files. Hate to ask for tech support
on this forum but it's all I've
On Thursday, 11 April 2019 at 06:20:05 UTC, Julian wrote:
Hello,
When reading through the following D blog post, I noticed in the
feature chart that D had "Arrays beginning at arbitrary
indices" as
a +1 feature, the same as in Ada.
Hello,
When reading through the following D blog post, I noticed in the
feature chart that D had "Arrays beginning at arbitrary indices"
as
a +1 feature, the same as in Ada.
https://dlang.org/blog/2018/06/20/how-an-engineering-company-chose-to-migrate-to-d/
That surprised me, and from the
23 matches
Mail list logo
