One day I'll finish my OpenGL wrapper for D. It will give you
better abilities in creating OpenGL 3 contexts than most C++
frameworks (SDL, GLFW etc.) and, I hope, will get rid of passing
pointers to functions.
It will be done soon after I'll finish Scintilla wrapper for D.
And it will be
Hm, doesn't anybody know anything about it?
On 04/23/2012 11:29 PM, Namespace wrote:
I have this code:
...
T _get() {
return this._value;
}
const(T) _get() const {
return this._value;
}
You missed the 'immutable' and 'inout cases.
Just use inout(T) _get() inout { return _value; } instead of the
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:43:20 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
While dealing with unicode in my std.stream rewrite, I've found that
hand-decoding dchars is way faster than using library calls.
After watching Andrei's talk on generic and generative programming I have
bearophile , dans le message (digitalmars.D.learn:35108), a écrit :
What about (untested):
auto uniformRange(T1 lower, T2 upper) {
return count().map!(_ = uniform(lower, upper))();
}
That looks like a workarround, not meaningful code.
How about
return repeat(_ =uniform(lower,
With the dmd 2.059 I have started getting the error 'use of base class
protection is deprecated' when I try to implement an interface with
private visibility, ie:
interface Interface { }
class Class : private Interface { }
$ dmd test.d
test.d(4): use of base class protection is
On 24/04/12 14:22, David Bryant wrote:
With the dmd 2.059 I have started getting the error 'use of base class
protection is deprecated' when I try to implement an interface with
private visibility, ie:
interface Interface { }
class Class : private Interface { }
$ dmd test.d
test.d(4): use of
Am Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:31:40 -0700
schrieb Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com:
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 04:21:09 Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 14/04/12 23:03, q66 wrote:
He also uses a class. And -noboundscheck should be automatically induced
by
-release.
... but the
You missed the 'immutable' and 'inout cases.
Just use inout(T) _get() inout { return _value; } instead of
the two declarations you have.
Oh, thanks a lot, i'm forgetting this often.
...
And therefore i get the same error, as if i wrote return
NotNull!(Foo)(this); instead of return
On 24/04/12 15:29, David Bryant wrote:
Because it doesn't make sense. All classes are derived from Object. That
_has_ to be public, otherwise things like == wouldn't work.
Does the same apply for interfaces? I'm specifically implementing an
interface with non-public visibility. This
trav...@phare.normalesup.org:
That looks like a workarround, not meaningful code.
It wasn't terrible code :-)
How about
return repeat(_ =uniform(lower, upper)).map!(x = x())();
?
Why don't you write a little benchmark to compare the performance
of the two versions?
Using
Am Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:05:36 +0200
schrieb ReneSac renedu...@yahoo.com.br:
I have this simple binary arithmetic coder in C++ by Mahoney and
translated to D by Maffi. I added notrow, final and pure
and GC.disable where it was possible, but that didn't made much
difference. Adding const to
On 04/24/2012 11:07 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
On 24/04/12 15:29, David Bryant wrote:
Because it doesn't make sense. All classes are derived from Object. That
_has_ to be public, otherwise things like == wouldn't work.
Does the same apply for interfaces? I'm specifically implementing an
On 04/24/2012 11:47 PM, David Bryant wrote:
On 04/24/2012 11:07 PM, Don Clugston wrote:
On 24/04/12 15:29, David Bryant wrote:
Because it doesn't make sense. All classes are derived from Object.
That
_has_ to be public, otherwise things like == wouldn't work.
Does the same apply for
Is there anyway to force a static foreach to occur?
template TT(T...)
{
alias T TT;
}
void main()
{
// This works
foreach(s; TT!(a, b, c))
{
mixin(`int ` ~ s ~ `;`);
}
enum foo = TT!(a, b, c);
// This fails
foreach(s; foo)
{
mixin(`int ` ~
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 11:24:44 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:43:20 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
While dealing with unicode in my std.stream rewrite, I've
found that hand-decoding dchars is way faster than using
library calls.
After watching
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 14:54:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 11:24:44 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
After watching Andrei's talk on generic and generative
programming I have to ask, which routines are you avoiding ..
it seems we need to make them as good as the
Am 24.04.2012 16:34, schrieb Robert Clipsham:
enum foo = TT!(a, b, c);
alias TT!(a, b, c) foo;
btw. there is std.typecons : TypeTuple with helpers (like staticMap)
== Auszug aus Dmitry Olshansky (dmitry.o...@gmail.com)'s Artikel
On 21.04.2012 22:46, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:41:18PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 21.04.2012 21:24, nrgyzer wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to use std.regex to parse a string like the following:
After i'm sure, that this is a bug: Great work again.
If this bug will be fixed soon or someone can help me to find a
workaround, then NotNull would be exactly what I always wanted.
Hello.
I'm probably not looking hard enough, but Do we have any
standard d-library for serializing an object/object tree into
-for example- an xml file?
thanks.
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 16:42:19 UTC, dcoder wrote:
I'm probably not looking hard enough, but Do we have any
standard d-library for serializing an object/object tree into
-for example- an xml file?
There is no standard library support yet, but you might want to
look at Orange (full
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 12:22:14 UTC, David Bryant wrote:
This bothers me for two reasons: firstly it's not a base class,
and secondly, it's a standard OO pattern of mine.
What's up with this?
Generally (and slightly inaccurately) speaking, D follows the
Java model for inheritance
...
And therefore i get the same error, as if i wrote return
NotNull!(Foo)(this); instead of return
assumeNotNull(this);, in the
_convert method of NotNull. The Output is Stack overflow.
I think
that comes from recursive calls which fills the stack? Is that
a bug?
Yes.
I found nothing
I'm trying to write a template function for doing member-wise
comparisons between two objects, with an optional list of members to
ignore. But I can't seem to figure out the syntax for passing a list of
strings (or an AA of strings) to the function?
I tried this:
bool
bool compareByMemb(string[] ignores, T)(T obj1, T obj2) {
foreach (name; __traits(getAllMembers, T)) {
...
}
In this particular case you could try
foo(T, U...)(T obj1, T obj2, U ignores)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:39:42PM +0200, Trass3r wrote:
bool compareByMemb(string[] ignores, T)(T obj1, T obj2) {
foreach (name; __traits(getAllMembers, T)) {
...
}
In this particular case you could try
foo(T, U...)(T obj1, T obj2, U
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:47:53AM -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:39:42PM +0200, Trass3r wrote:
bool compareByMemb(string[] ignores, T)(T obj1, T obj2) {
foreach (name; __traits(getAllMembers, T)) {
...
}
In this
On 04/24/2012 07:37 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm trying to write a template function for doing member-wise
comparisons between two objects, with an optional list of members to
ignore. But I can't seem to figure out the syntax for passing a list of
strings (or an AA of strings) to the function?
I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:03:07PM +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/24/2012 07:37 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm trying to write a template function for doing member-wise
comparisons between two objects, with an optional list of members to
ignore. But I can't seem to figure out the syntax for passing
What is the recommended way to access the equivalent of
numeric_limits epsilon() in D? I am searching especially for the
double version.
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/std/limits/numeric_limits/
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:36:34PM +0200,
digitalmars-d-learn-boun...@puremagic.com wrote:
What is the recommended way to access the equivalent of
numeric_limits epsilon() in D? I am searching especially for the
double version.
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/std/limits/numeric_limits/
On 2012-04-24 18:42, dcoder wrote:
Hello.
I'm probably not looking hard enough, but Do we have any standard
d-library for serializing an object/object tree into -for example- an
xml file?
thanks.
You can have a look at Orange:
https://github.com/jacob-carlborg/orange
Tutorials:
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 18:48:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:36:34PM +0200,
digitalmars-d-learn-boun...@puremagic.com wrote:
What is the recommended way to access the equivalent of
numeric_limits epsilon() in D? I am searching especially for
the
double version.
On 04/24/2012 07:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
...
And therefore i get the same error, as if i wrote return
NotNull!(Foo)(this); instead of return assumeNotNull(this);, in the
_convert method of NotNull. The Output is Stack overflow. I think
that comes from recursive calls which fills the stack? Is
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 19:34:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/24/2012 07:09 PM, Namespace wrote:
...
And therefore i get the same error, as if i wrote return
NotNull!(Foo)(this); instead of return
assumeNotNull(this);, in the
_convert method of NotNull. The Output is Stack
overflow. I
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:24:44 Regan Heath wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:43:20 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
While dealing with unicode in my std.stream rewrite, I've found that
hand-decoding dchars is way faster than using library calls.
After watching
On 04/24/2012 08:50 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-04-24 18:42, dcoder wrote:
Hello.
I'm probably not looking hard enough, but Do we have any standard
d-library for serializing an object/object tree into -for example- an
xml file?
thanks.
You can have a look at Orange:
What's the correct way of implementing formattedRead support for
user-defined types? I tried overloading the unformatValue() template,
but for some reason the compiler doesn't seem to be picking it up.
T
--
People walk. Computers run.
Marco Leise:
I ported fast paq8 (fp8) to D, and with some careful
D-ification and optimization it runs a bit faster than the
original C program when compiled with the GCC on Linux x86_64,
Core 2 Duo.
I guess you mean GDC.
With DMD, even if you are a good D programmer, it's not easy to
beat
On 24/04/12 13:50, Christophe wrote:
We could also use a template to make a range out of a delegate and avoid
this workarround...
What I'd _really_ like to see is something which would allow you to generate a
range of random numbers with an expression like,
auto rr =
On Tuesday, 24 April 2012 at 21:50:03 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What's the correct way of implementing formattedRead support for
user-defined types? I tried overloading the unformatValue()
template,
but for some reason the compiler doesn't seem to be picking it
up.
Unfortunately, there is not
H. S. Teoh:
What's the correct way of implementing formattedRead support for
user-defined types? I tried overloading the unformatValue()
template,
but for some reason the compiler doesn't seem to be picking it
up.
Maybe do you want to open this discussion in the main D
newsgroup? I think
The compiler rejects this:
class Base {}
class Derived : Base {}
void main()
{
Base*basePtr;
Derived* derivedPtr;
basePtr = derivedPtr; // ERROR
}
Is that really correct that it shouldn't be allowed?
44 matches
Mail list logo
