On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 04:58:17 UTC, RTM wrote:
Data hiding is overrated.
Furthermore, OOP is overrated :-)
https://betterprogramming.pub/object-oriented-programming-the-trillion-dollar-disaster-92a4b666c7c7
What is 'Object-Oriented Programming'? (1991 revised version)
Bjarne Stroust
On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 04:58:17 UTC, RTM wrote:
Data hiding is overrated.
Furthermore, OOP is overrated :-)
https://betterprogramming.pub/object-oriented-programming-the-trillion-dollar-disaster-92a4b666c7c7
Submit a request to the C++ Committee to remove private from the
language.
On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 04:43:11 UTC, RTM wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 20:56:00 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Both the module type, and the class type need this capability.
No, they are not.
Look at Go.
Go does not have classes.
Data hiding is overrated.
Furthermore, OOP is overrated :-)
https://betterprogramming.pub/object-oriented-programming-the-trillion-dollar-disaster-92a4b666c7c7
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 20:56:00 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Both the module type, and the class type need this capability.
No, they are not.
Look at Go.
On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 01:21:18 UTC, zjh wrote:
They don't admit their mistakes! And `D` community is getting
smaller and smaller!
Because other languages laughs cry!
`D` don't even have `type-safe` classes.
The ability of a group of people to open their eyes and tell lies
is really
On Friday, 17 February 2023 at 01:13:59 UTC, zjh wrote:
They can't refute you, so they have to blame you.
You can't wake up who pretend to sleep.
They don't admit their mistakes! And `D` community is getting
smaller and smaller!
If I were D author , I would suspect that they are undercover
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 22:25:22 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
also, I noticed that you intentionally? did not respond to the
facts that I outlined:
ie.
They can't refute you, so they have to blame you.
You can't wake up who pretend to sleep.
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:56:03 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:23:53 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Forcing programmers to use a design mechanism rather than a
language mechanism to achieve the above abstraction is wrong.
This seems to be the source of the dis
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:56:03 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:23:53 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Forcing programmers to use a design mechanism rather than a
language mechanism to achieve the above abstraction is wrong.
This seems to be the source of the dis
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 21:23:53 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
Forcing programmers to use a design mechanism rather than a
language mechanism to achieve the above abstraction is wrong.
This seems to be the source of the disagreement, correct?
There's no disagreement. It's you posting t
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 20:56:00 UTC, ProtectAndHide
wrote:
My agrument is this:
Objects are data abstractions with an interface of named
operations and a hidden local state. Does anyone disagree with
this?
D does not have a language mechanism, but rather a design
mechanism that
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 13:39:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:51:39AM +, FeepingCreature via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
Springboarding off this post:
This thread is vastly dominated by some people who care very
much about this issue. Comparatively, for i
https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools/issues/917
How go programmers cope with this feature?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:51:39AM +, FeepingCreature via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
[...]
> Springboarding off this post:
>
> This thread is vastly dominated by some people who care very much
> about this issue. Comparatively, for instance, I care very little
> because I think D already does
So let me just say: I think D does it right. D does not have
class encapsulation; it has module encapsulation. This is by
design, and the design is good.
The design is terrible...
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:27:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 02:26:44 UTC, Mike Parker
wrote:
Wrong. I'm arguing things:
Geez. "I'm arguing 2 things:"
Springboarding off this post:
This thread is vastly dominated by some people who care very much
ab
But at stop mispresenting what I'm saying. What I've stated
above, is what I'm saying.. no more.. no less.
Well said.
Its not that hard to understand, folks.
18 matches
Mail list logo
