Can you make dub ignore dependencies when building docs?
On Saturday, 16 May 2020 at 02:02:47 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Saturday, 16 May 2020 at 01:11:54 UTC, NaN wrote:
Rather than trying to inspect the function itself, it's easier
to check that the result of *calling* the function is what you
expect it to be. So, for example:
is(typeof(T.x(
Howdy, any idea what Im doing wrong? Given a type T i want to
test the presence of certain methods. I looked in phobos to see
how isInputRange was defined but it didnt really help as all the
methods have no parameters and it used some weird lamda stuff i
think.
template isPathType(T)
{
a
On Sunday, 10 May 2020 at 01:15:58 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Sunday, 10 May 2020 at 00:33:07 UTC, NaN wrote:
Ie something like..
auto Foo(T)(auto ref T x)
{
static if (isByRef(x))
{
}
else
{
}
}
__traits(isRef, x)
Thanks :)
Ie something like..
auto Foo(T)(auto ref T x)
{
static if (isByRef(x))
{
}
else
{
}
}
On Friday, 8 May 2020 at 22:11:57 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Friday, 8 May 2020 at 22:03:47 UTC, NaN wrote:
The integer literal `1` is an rvalue, and can't be passed by
reference.
If you explicitly instantiate the templates foo and bar in the
function call, you get a more informative error m
Ok given the following code...
auto foo(T)(T x)
{
struct V1 { T* what; }
V1 v;
return v;
}
auto bam(T)(T x)
{
struct V2 { T* what; }
V2 v;
return v;
}
void bar()
{
bam(foo(1));
}
if you change the declaration of foo or bam to "ref T x", ie..
auto foo(T)(ref T x)
a
On Friday, 8 May 2020 at 22:03:47 UTC, NaN wrote:
Ok given the following code...
auto foo(T)(T x)
{
struct V1 { T* what; }
V1 v;
return v;
}
auto bam(T)(T x)
{
struct V2 { T* what; }
V2 v;
return v;
}
void bar()
{
bam(foo(1));
}
Should have said that compiles fine
OK so I am using the intel intrinsics library, I ws just copying
it into my source tree. So in the interests of automation I added
it as a dependency in dub, but now my code is anywhere up to 3
times slower. So I figure maybe as its being compiled as a
library, it's not getting inlined because
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 13:43:30 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2020 at 13:42:01 UTC, NaN wrote:
try { writeln(e.msg); }
try `writeln(e.toString());` instead.
msg only contains the message passed to the constructor by
itself, toString includes the file/line a
Normally a failed assert gives the file, line number and a stack
trace, but I hit one today that just prints..
assertion failure
Im sure it is because it's in the WindowProc callback from the
OS. As the callback is nothrow you need to catch and handle
anything there, you have to catch all thr
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 16:21:32 UTC, solidstate1991
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 January 2020 at 14:46:01 UTC, NaN wrote:
Its pretty much all working, except you cant see dynamic array
contents and occasionally it steps a line out of sync.
I never managed to get any debugger working in VS
On Friday, 27 December 2019 at 18:48:50 UTC,
cfcd14f496326e429ce03c48650b7966 wrote:
Hello.
I spent many time to searching for find a solutions. Many posts
not clearly or tell like brief. :(
I tried "Microsoft C/C++(ms-vscode.cpptools)" and "Native Debug
(webfreak.debug
)" plugin. And I foun
On Saturday, 21 September 2019 at 12:50:46 UTC, Bogdan wrote:
I'm trying to understand how to use the `core.simd`
functionality, and I'm having trouble initializing a float4
vector.
Here's my example code:
```
import std.stdio;
import core.simd;
void main()
{
float[4] values = [1.0f, 2.0f,
On Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 14:58:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 12:51:20 UTC, NaN wrote:
I used an evolutionary optimisation algorithm on the table all
at once. So you do a weighted sum of max deviation, and 1st
and 2nd order discontinuity at the joins. And mini
On Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 09:52:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 May 2019 at 09:04:31 UTC, NaN wrote:
Its pretty common technique in audio synthesis.
Indeed. CSound does this.
What i've done in the past is store a table of polynomial
segments that were optimised with curv
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 17:40:40 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 17:04:33 UTC, Alex wrote:
I'm not sure what the real precision of the build in functions
are but it shouldn't be hard to max out a double using
standard methods(even if slow, but irrelevant after the LU
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 17:04:33 UTC, Alex wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 13:57:30 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2019 at 12:24:02 UTC, Alex wrote:
If it truly is a 27x faster then then that is very relevant
and knowing why is important.
Of course, a lot of that might s
On Sunday, 20 January 2019 at 18:51:54 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/20/19 1:28 PM, faissaloo wrote:
In Python -1%3 == 2 however in D -1%3 == -1
Is there a standard library function or something that gives
me the Python version of modulo?
Hm... (n%3+3)%3 should work.
-Steve
You onl
19 matches
Mail list logo
