Re: OPTLINK Error 45 Too Much DEBUG Data for Old CodeView format
Just save yourself lots of headaches and abandon the optlink/omf crap with -m64 resp. -m32mscoff.
Re: dsource and WinAPI
the long-term solution is to include the [win32] headers in druntime ™
Re: How do I write __simd(void16*, void16) ?
On Wednesday, 8 October 2014 at 18:56:31 UTC, Etienne wrote: I can't seem to find this function anywhere: __simd(void16*, void16) MOVDQU = void _mm_storeu_si128 ( __m128i *p, __m128i a) MOVDQU = __m128i _mm_loadu_si128 ( __m128i *p) Is there a module by now that allows to directly write Intel intrinsics?
Re: Installing LDC on Windows
SEH was patented, so llvm doesn't support it. That has changed.
Re: Installing LDC on Windows
On Saturday, 6 September 2014 at 21:54:00 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote: On Saturday, 6 September 2014 at 17:51:16 UTC, Trass3r wrote: SEH was patented, so llvm doesn't support it. That has changed. Has it? SEH on Win64 is something entirely different from the original (x86) SEH design, and not covered by said patent. Ok 2in1. 1) As far as I know the x86 SEH patent expired in June. 2) For x64 the implementation is very close now: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/166#issuecomment-54522891
Re: Showing a user specified error message when no overloads match
Yeah that's the price we pay for the simplicity. Also most constraints directly or indirectly consist of a complex boolean expressions and you don't get any hint which part failed and why.
Re: Question about @nogc in D 2.066
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/pxotrowaqcenrpnnw...@forum.dlang.org
Re: Why is the Win32 boilerplate the way it is?
The only question I have is what happens when you use SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS:4.0 (Which I understand means XP or higher) and the program runs on something older? WinXP is dead :)
Re: what is going on with cgcs.c:351?
I think it should be possible to run DustMite on some big project like phobos to actually search for such internal errors.
Re: Debugging compiler crashes?
dmd: glue.c:542: virtual void FuncDeclaration::toObjFile(int): Assertion `semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' failed. Aborted wouter@carillon:~/code/d/DustMite$ ... and I'm not yet that fluent in D to understand what's going on. Any ideas? pass dustmite.d before dsplit.d known problem, but the error message has changed
Re: Debugging compiler crashes?
... the order of files matters? Yuck. Yep it's a bug.
Re: Lack of warning messages
A notice for some unused imports would be great too... You could create a brute-force tool. Rip off an import statement at a time and see if it still compiles. One could probably modify DustMite to do that.
Re: Casting the Result of splitter() into a string array
If you want to convert a range to an array, use std.array.array This is a constant source of confusion and it also is a crappy design to use a function in a totally different module for this purpose imho. Can't these Result types get an eval() method and/or be made implicitly convertible to an array where appropriate? The C++ matrix library Eigen uses this approach and it works out fantastically. a*b returns an object representing this expression. If I do want to use this I write 'auto c=a*b;'. If I want the result I can explicitly use its eval() method (which is especially useful inside a bigger expression) or something like 'Matrix c=a*b;' which also evaluates the expression.
Re: align(16) struct member throws an exception with movdqa
test code please
Re: align(16) struct member throws an exception with movdqa
import std.stdio, core.simd;
void main()
{ int4 v;
}
Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcod.c 1447
Building Debug\dtest1.exe failed!
Works fine on Linux.
Maybe the 32Bit check doesn't work for Windoze?
-m32 on Linux yields Error: SIMD vector types not supported on this
platform
Re: align(16) struct member throws an exception with movdqa
I think it has been fixed for the next version of DMD already. Any idea why align isn't letting me use movdqa? Cause align doesn't work the way you think it does. In fact I still don't understand how it works at all.
Re: std.mmfile issues
I found out that OpenFileMapping is not needed and CreateFileMapping is sufficient. I managed to code this with std.c.windows only however MmFile is not working even with simplest examlple maybe a bug under win 7? Possible. Feel free to file a bug report or create a pull request.
Re: undefined reference - Derelict2
Though I was under the impression that the new Derelict2 hierarchy / d interface files in Derelict2/import reduced the neccesity for command line arguments, that is a Derelict related question. You may try to use --chatty and compare the output.
Re: How to pass list of strings as compile-time parameters?
bool compareByMemb(string[] ignores, T)(T obj1, T obj2) {
foreach (name; __traits(getAllMembers, T)) {
...
}
In this particular case you could try
foo(T, U...)(T obj1, T obj2, U ignores)
Re: this() const
Am 15.04.2012, 21:20 Uhr, schrieb sclytrack sclytr...@hotmail.com:
this( const size_t step) const
{
this.step = step;
}
Error: cannot modify const/immutable/inout expression this.step
Is this the expected behavior? Thanks.
Yep.
Re: D Dll injection problem
Maybe it's because I have no def file. Very possible. Just pass it to dmd like the other files. Or try the new -shared flag.
Re: D Dll injection problem
I inject it but it returns nothing and the App(where the dll is injected) is hanging( not responding). Could you try it maybe? I would like to know whether it's a Problem with D or with me. Are dlls without injection working?
Re: Vector operations optimization.
The flags you want are -O, -inline -release. If you don't have those, then that might explain some of the slow down on slicing, since -release drops a ton of runtime checks. -noboundscheck option can also speed up things.
Re: Vector operations optimization.
What is the status at the moment? What compiler and with which compiler flags I should use to achieve maximum performance? In general gdc or ldc. Not sure how good vectorization is though, esp. auto-vectorization. On the other hand the so called vector operations like a[] = b[] + c[]; are lowered to hand-written SSE assembly even in dmd.
Re: anything that would provide support for zip filesystem?
I guess Tango provides something like that via the VFS stuff. https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2 resp. https://github.com/mtachrono/tango
Re: preprocessor pass equivalent?
There's a pull request to help with debugging string mixins: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/426
Re: htod - const
Why is 'const' removed? cause htod sucks. D1 didn't have const and htod wasn't updated for ages.
Re: htod - const
Am 06.03.2012, 20:13 Uhr, schrieb maarten van damme maartenvd1...@gmail.com: I wouldn't say that it sucks. It has really helped a lot in porting some simple header files. It goes terribly bad on the more complex though. Sadly, using regular expressions is much more efficient. At least those don't destroy the source by removing const, comments, evaluating preprocessor directives, etc.
Re: Dumb question about git
OK, so what's the right way to do it then? I have some changes in a branch, but master has been updated since, so I want to merge in the latest updates so that the branch changes are compatible with the latest code. I use a quite crappy way to rebase my feature branch: git stash git checkout master git pull -v --rebase git rebase master myworkingbranch There's probably some redundancy or whatever here, but at least it works ^^
Re: Random behavior using a wrapped C library
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Re: Random behavior using a wrapped C library
A blocker for using x64 on linux then. Use gdc. Better codegen anyway.
Re: produced binary is quite big
You may try -L--gc-sections (in case of gdc in combination with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections) and -L-s
Re: Make alias parameter optional?
void foo(T, T2, alias thing = (){})(T a, T2 b)
{
thing();
}
void bar(){}
void main()
{
foo!(int,int,bar)(1,2);
foo(1,2);
}
Re: Executable size when compiling with GDC
Lots of symbols and stuff. You can get it down with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -Wl,-s,--gc-sections Phobos should also be compiled with -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections to get the whole effect though.
Re: Everything on the Stack
scope auto e1 = new EntryInt(); Foo = e1.toFoo(); You don't need auto there. And scope is deprecated, use std.typecons' scoped
Re: Compiling Lua for D
LuaD works fine, but I'd rather learn to compile stuff like this myself. It will get me further in the long run^^ Try to switch to gdc. dmc, optlink Co. must die a bloody death anyway :)
Re: D for game Development
Can I use OpenGL or DirectX with D? Of course. E.g. there's a D1 game engine: http://yage3d.net I think http://3d.benjamin-thaut.de/?p=16 is D2, but it's rendering code only.
Re: Compiling Lua for D
I guess GDC uses COFF? That would definitely be handy... although I couldn't compile and debug from VS anymore in that case, and that would be unfortunate^^ Just recently Rainer added gdc support to cv2pdb.
Re: Struct inheritance
So why not just use classes? I've understood it as there may be a performance gain by using structs over classes, and in my program Point and Coordinate are used heavily. The other big difference is value vs. reference type. You can use alias this to achieve something like struct inheritance.
Re: i18n
I deduce so that there is no official support for that. If it's, it's a pain. Pain? Writing such a system can be done in a couple of lines.
Re: linker @ meaning and how to compile static libs
The main question is how do I either compile the library with the right version suffix (@12) Or get the linker to use the right version suffix (@8) That's no version suffix. It's the number of bytes of the arguments IIRC. Windows calling convention.
Re: i18n
Thanks a lot, So I just need to detect user locale using How to do that? You can always use the functions you would use in C.
Re: opAssign and references
I am using DMD 2.057 on Ubuntu 64bit. Are you sure that it does not
work? Can anyone reproduce the error?
import std.variant;
struct Foo {
Variant a;
ref Variant refA(){
return a;
}
}
void main(){
Foo f1;
f1.refA() = 24;
}
Compiles fine on Ubuntu x64 with git dmd and -m(32|64)
Re: Scoped Class Instance
However, I cannot, by default, scope my custom allocations. Any ideas? std.typecons.scoped
Re: regex: force entire string to match
I want to write a regex to check if a whole string is a number. With my current regex([0-9]+) numbers will be carved out of things like aaa456 (hit: 456) and I circumvent this by checking the lengths for inequality, which is stupid. My regex is surely missing something? Try ^ and $ if applicable. These match start and end of a line.
Re: Class Initialization
I was reading the C++ Object Model book recently (well, I'm still reading) and was amazed at how many edge-cases there are in C++, and how lucky I am to be using D. Well, minus the Optlink that is. :) *whispers gee dee c*
Re: Class Initialization
*whispers gee dee c* windows binaries please... Seek and you shall find. https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads
Re: Chained Catch Statements
What is the idiom for handling a case where multiple exceptions of different types may be thrown? I think you could catch a common baseclass like Exception and test if it's a specific Exception by casting.
Re: dmd gdc
There is also gdmd : dmd front end that use gdc It's nothing but a perl script that translates dmd command line options into gdc ones.
Re: dmd gdc
Building gcc in general is a pain. It's just a little less painful on *nix systems, but still painful. I can't agree. The build instructions contain everything. Has been straightforward for me right from the beginning.
Re: dmd gdc
I looked up ldc recently, and it seems that it hasn't been updated for years. Seems that gdc is the only other D compiler that's still actively maintained. Please don't spread such misinformation. https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/commits/master
Re: Definition of extern(System)?
I was pretty sure it's somewhere in the spec.
Re: for loop
void main(){
for ({int x=0; short y=0;} x 10; x++, y++){
}
}
wtf?
Re: for loop
for (int x = 0, int y = 0; .) for (int x=0, y=0; ...)
Re: Struct initialization, implicit conversions and delegates
StringHash sh = SomeString; // ok That's the only thing that works. An @implicit tag for constructors to allow all implicit conversions would really be helpful. In general we need finer control of implicit conversions. Just have a look at ProxyOf: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/300/files#L0R2670 That's madness, all of that code just for getting alias this without implicit conversion to the original type.
Re: Problem with interfacing C code to D
What's the definition of Display?
Re: Ref local variables?
MapTile[] map; // It's a struct ref MapTile tile=map[y*w+x]; tile.id=something; tile.isWall=true; MapTile* tile = map[y*w+x];
Re: Ref local variables?
Sorry, didn't read the rest. ^^
Re: typedef deprecated - now what ?
is there a template or something in phobos to get the same typesafe behaviour of good old typedef ? I've brought this up several times. People just don't give a shit. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5467
Re: Reading about D: few questions
5. Align attribute.
http://dlang.org/attribute.html#align
struct S {
align(4) byte a; // placed at offset 0
align(4) byte b; // placed at offset 1
}
Explain this please.
align is a huge mess imo.
It matches the corresponding C compiler behavior
So what's the point of align in the first place, if the compiler does what
it wants anyway, see above?
The only thing that really works is
align(1) struct S {...}
for packed structs.
Re: test if object is instance of class at compile time
I'd really like to have 'if (instance is ClassType)' syntax in D.
Re: writing iterators without code duplication. inout?
Can't really answer your original question, but 1. Why don't you use opApply? 2. Why do you use ref int even in the const version? 3. You could also use alias this to allow iteration, don't know if that's what you want in general though.
Re: Void initialization
Am 19.12.2011, 13:04 Uhr, schrieb Bear joanylepri...@yahoo.fr: Using D1, I have a program that creates tons of float[] ; for performance reasons, I would like them to be uninitialized. std.array.uninitializedArray
Re: Allocating memory in D shared library when accessed from C++
It actualy returns a procedure address and the procedure is called. It lands inside export extern (C) int magicNumber() and crashes when attempting to allocate memory for Something. Did you properly initialize druntime?
Re: Allocating memory in D shared library when accessed from C++
Am 19.12.2011, 23:13 Uhr, schrieb Martin Drašar dra...@ics.muni.cz: Dne 19.12.2011 23:09, Trass3r napsal(a): It actualy returns a procedure address and the procedure is called. It lands inside export extern (C) int magicNumber() and crashes when attempting to allocate memory for Something. Did you properly initialize druntime? As I am just starting with D, the most precise answer I can give you is: I don't know... how do I tell? Or in another way - the code for D library is almost complete except for imports. The rest was done for me by Visual D. It's explained there: http://www.dlang.org/dll.html
Re: Alias/Ref Tuples ?
I think something like this is implemented in a dmd pull request.
Re: -D option = Embedded documentation
Am 16.12.2011, 17:47 Uhr, schrieb dune do-...@email.com: Never tried this before: Tried (with D2.057) to use the embedded documentation option with: /** * documentation here */ and the html files are generated but they only contain a html skeleton and no documentation. This comment doesn't refer to any code.
Re: -D option = Embedded documentation
What I posted was an example, in reality there is tons of code inside the d file. Show the file, or part of it.
Re: -D option = Embedded documentation
hrsmallPage generated by a href=http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/ddoc.html;Ddoc/a. /small /body/html Ah looks like that must be updated to dlang.org too
Re: -D option = Embedded documentation
Am 16.12.2011, 19:45 Uhr, schrieb dune do-...@email.com:
I didn't realize that stuff like this will not work as expected:
[code]
/***
* Brief summary of what
* myfunc does, forming the summary section.
*
* First paragraph of synopsis description.
*
* Second paragraph of
* synopsis description.
*/
void myfunc() { }
/***
* This is just some text that
* should be added to the
* documentation
*/
// below is the next chunk of code
[/code]
The second block of documentation will not show up.
How is the doc generator supposed to know where that doc fragment is
supposed to end up?
If it's related to a declaration, put it there.
If it's just a module-level comment, put it into the module doc comment.
Re: D Grammar Specification
http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2011-March/098950.html
Re: auto
The type has to be deduced anyway for type checking the assignment/initialization. Makes sense. Overseen that.
Re: Internal error: ..\ztc\cgcs.c 352
Please check if your case is equal to http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4414
Re: Make a variable single-assignment?
Don't think so. You could also wrap it in a struct with disabled opAssign, but this would also change the type.
Re: web development in D programming
I am a little disapointed, so if you have many request for a web page this lib http://arsdnet.net/dcode/ is usable or not ? If they are any other method to do a web application in D2 programming do not hesitate and tell to me which lib used. There's also a project named Serenity http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/Serenity_web_framework_-_early_feedback_wanted_125473.html But it hasn't been updated in months nor is it mature. Adam uses his code in production and also provides FastCGI support.
Re: .Net
Am 09.11.2011, 13:39 Uhr, schrieb Reklen rek...@mymaill.com: Is there a project to export D in .Net world? I see this http://dnet.codeplex.com/ but it seems dead. Feel free to continue that project ;) Apart from that you are left with C interface dlls.
Re: Spurious imports in Phobos ?
2. what is your opinion about public import ? In C++, hidden or implicit #includes is a common source of compilation problems (order of #includes), I tend to think it's a bad thing. It can be quite useful. I use it often for C library wrappers. As soon as you import the wrapper code you automatically import the bindings to be able to use constants etc.
Re: Spurious imports in Phobos ?
Phobos contains a lot of templates and if a template isn't instantiated it won't be compiled. Meaning there can be hidden compile errors if you start to remove imports and they will not show until a template that uses something from the import is instantiate. Wouldn't it be possible/better then to move the imports into those template functions?
Re: Is this actually valid code?
class Foo
{
@property void test(int) {}
@property int test() { return 1; }
}
class Bar : Foo
{
alias super.test test;
override @property void test(int) {}
void bartest() { auto x = test; }
}
And it actually works! Is this a documented feature?
http://d-programming-language.org/hijack.html
Re: Is this actually valid code?
Cool stuff, thanks guys. This thing kicks some serious C++ ass. ^^ How? You can use using in C++ to do the same.
Re: extends and implements
You can do this and/or use the convention of extends first, implements
second:
class Rectangle : Drawable, IShape, IOtherInterface {}
It's not a convention, the spec demands that.
http://d-programming-language.org/class.html
If you're really concerned about clarity, use comments:
class Rectangle : /* extends */ Drawable,
/* implements */ IShape
{
}
Good point.
Re: template expressions in C++ to an equivalent in D
I was thinking about porting http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php in D. Don't we have a LinAlg library now thx to that GSoC project? I'm currently on SFML2 but it goes quite fast (thanks to Trass3r for porting SFML to D2 so a big part of the job is done). You're welcome.
Re: char and string with umlauts
Make sure your source file is saved in UTF-8 format.
Re: Looking for documentation of D's lower-level aspects.
Am 20.10.2011, 00:06 Uhr, schrieb Sean Silva chisophu...@gmail.com: == Quote from Jesse Phillips (jessekphillip...@gmail.com)'s article Right now D isn't ready to be used in this fashion It looks there's a more-or-less functional kernel written in D (and pretty well documented too): http://wiki.xomb.org/index.php?title=Main_Page You do not need the Tango standard library to compile XOmB as it contains its own standard calls and runtime.
Re: Looking for documentation of D's lower-level aspects.
ahead = n._next; The C/C++ equivalent of this is `ahead = n-next;`, or equivalently `ahead = (*n).next;`. This is a difference in semantics from C/C++ with respect to the `.`---it seems like D turns pointer to struct property accesses into property access with indirection. Yes. It was really dumb to introduce that in C back then cause you can't easily change from a pointer to a class to a real class without editing all places where it is accessed. D chose the sane and safer way of letting the compiler figure out what to do. Nowhere that I can recall in Alexandrescu's book talked about this, but it's a really big deal! I can't recall where I read about it back then, but I did know it soon after I had started learning D. Some of the differences to C/C++ are explained there: http://www.d-programming-language.org/ctod.html Though it could use an overhaul. As for getting rid of the GC, it is theoretically possible. But nobody has put much effort into making it work yet (cause the only application platform is still x86/64). I guess it will become necessary though once D conquers ARM (we can generate code for it with LDC/GDC but druntime isn't ready).
Re: operator ~ does not check type?
I believe that the primary reasoning for allowing the implicit conversion between int and dchar is so that code like this dchar c = 'a' + 7; That's a '+' though, not a '~'. I think it shouldn't be allowed with ~ since it's misleading. Newbies would probably expect abc ~ 10 to yield abc10 rather than the odd abc\n.
Re: Calling D DLL from C# and passing/retrieving string variables
[DllImport(mydll.dll, CallingConvention = CallingConvention.Cdecl, SetLastError = false, CharSet = CharSet.Auto)] private static extern bool concatenate( string str1, // in string str2, // in StringBuilder strResult); // out Question is if that StringBuilder really is equal to a char* in this case.
Re: How convice people that D it's wonderfull in a hour ?
Talk about stuff that's hard to do or impossible in C++ (or just a PITA
like the whole language) and compare it to some nifty D code.
For example template metaprogramming. No easy way to do template
constraints, no is expressions nor a proper typeof so you have to use
specialization a lot.
You could also show something that checks for an interface at
compile-time, like
template isInputRange(R)
{
enum bool isInputRange = is(typeof(
{
R r; // can define a range object
if (r.empty) {} // can test for empty
r.popFront(); // can invoke popFront()
auto h = r.front; // can get the front of the range
}()));
}
CTFE is another strong feature.
You could for example show some code that generates Token handling code
(an enum for the tokens, associative arrays for token 2 string and the
other way around, etc.) to be used by a lexer without the necessity for a
DSL like in Clang or a separate tool like dmd.
Re: contrary of std.utf.toUTFz!(const(wchar)*)
I feel a little stupid, but how to convert a wchar* zero terminated string into a wstring (DMD 2.055)? wstring w = cstr[0 .. strlenw(cstr)];
Re: contrary of std.utf.toUTFz!(const(wchar)*)
Just wanted to point out how it's implemented with language tools.
Re: Why an abstract pointer cannot be used as value in an associate array?
Am 29.09.2011, 06:51 Uhr, schrieb Cheng Wei riverch...@gmail.com:
extern(C) {
struct ab;
}
ab*[int] map;
void main() {
map.clear();
}
Cannot be compiled. Why?
Thanks.
Just use void* for opaque pointers in D.
Re: I can't build dsfml2 or derelict.sfml whit dsss
DSFML2's dsss file is just a remnant from the old DSFML. Also I don't really update DSFML2 anymore. A SWIG wrapper would be a better idea but it's hard to make it use our custom system module instead of wrapping the original one. In general using dsss isn't advisable, since rebuild is horribly outdated.
Re: toUTFz and WinAPI GetTextExtentPoint32W
bool test(HDC dc, string str, int len, SIZE* s)
{
wchar[] wstr = toUTFz!(wchar*)str;
GetTextExtentPoint32W(dc wstr.ptr, wstr.length, s);
toUTFz returns a wchar*, not a wchar[].
Re: toUTFz and WinAPI GetTextExtentPoint32W
Are you sure that the call requires the string to be null terminated? I
do not know that winapi function, but this might work:
bool test(HDC dc, string str, SIZE* s)
{
auto wstr = to!(wchar[])str;
GetTextExtentPoint32W(dc, wstr.ptr, wstr.length, s);
...
It doesn't need to be null-terminated for that function.
Shouldn't you use to!wstring though?!
Re: attribute decl in version decl
Am 18.09.2011, 18:55 Uhr, schrieb Ellery Newcomer
ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu:
Just came across some old D code that does this:
version(linux){
extern(C):
}
Hundreds of OpenGL decls
in dmd 2.055, the extern(C) is not being applied to the OpenGL decls.
should it?
Walter once said it was deliberate.
That extern(C) is only valid inside the version block.
But I also think it should be the other way around.
Re: D, DLLs, UnrealScript and UDK (Sort of a complex question)
So, my question is THIS: Can I write a windows DLL file in D that would have functions that can be accessible from a compiled C++ program? (Actually, in this case, it's UnrealScript that is compiled into a C++ exe.) It's perfectly possible to create DLLs with D, also see http://www.d-programming-language.org/dll.html I already successfully used a D dll with C interface to create Matlab plugins as well as a D dll exposing a COM interface to hook DirectDraw.
Re: attribute decl in version decl
Change it to the following, and you're golden.
extern(System):
Hundreds of OpenGL decls
That only fixes this particular issue.
I once had the following case that can't be done:
version(V1)
{
extern(System):
}
else
{
extern(C):
}
Re: port c macro to D
Am 15.09.2011, 13:37 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Pleh u...@example.net:
When porting c-code to D, I come consitently to the problem,
how to convert such a c-macro:
#define V(a,b,c) glVertex3d( a size, b size, c size );
#define N(a,b,c) glNormal3d( a, b, c );
N( 1.0, 0.0, 0.0); V(+,-,+); V(+,-,-); V(+,+,-); V(+,+,+);
...
Ok, I could just write it out, but that's not the case.
Sometimes I just want to keep it small and clear as in this example.
I've started with some static functions and use it in mixins:
static string V(string a, string b, string c) {
return glVertex3d(~a~ size, ~b~ size, ~c~ size);
}
static string N(string a, string b, string c) {
return glNormal3d(~a~,~b~,~c~);;
}
If you are willing to write V(+1,-1,+1) instead you can just turn them
into functions.
Also by static function you probably mean private in D.
Re: port c macro to D
Also by static function you probably mean private in D. No, I meant for mixin I nead static functions, but I just realized, it also works without the static keyword. I think static has no meaning in global scope, only in function scope where it tells the compiler you don't want a closure.
Re: How to get WinDbg to show a call stack on Windows 7?
You could also use cv2pdb's -C option and Visual Studio to debug dmd.
