Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-22 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 06:14 +, binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: […] > yeah, Diamond is great, but I think it will be more wonderful if > it's database ORM can be separated to a standalone project, > that's would be useful for the application that's is not WEB > oriented but need

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-22 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 06:14:40 UTC, binghoo dang wrote: On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:48:30 UTC, bauss wrote: Currently (When I get time again) working on implementing PostgreSQL and Sqlite support for Diamond. Mysql and Mssql should work out the box.

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-22 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 09:33:26 UTC, bauss wrote: I would suggest Accidentally pressed "Send", but as I was saying. I would suggest https://github.com/buggins/hibernated as an alternative.

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-22 Thread binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 08:22:34 UTC, Russel Winder wrote: If there was a D version of SQLAlchemy, that would be wonderful. Feel free to s/TBA/Russel Winder/ Great! there are many people waiting for this! ^_^

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-22 Thread binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 10:48:30 UTC, bauss wrote: Currently (When I get time again) working on implementing PostgreSQL and Sqlite support for Diamond. Mysql and Mssql should work out the box. https://github.com/DiamondMVC/Diamond Some examples will come later, unless you use the

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-21 Thread bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 02:30:16 UTC, binghoo dang wrote: hi, I thinks D need an ORM library for Sqlite/Mysql/PostgreSQL, entity currently support all the three targets, but entity's API is too complex and cumbersome for using. Is there a more light-weight and simpler implementation

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-21 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:42 +, binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: […] > > SQLAlchemy is very great, and I remember that > in D wiki has mentioned this, but the status is "Proposed Project > Mentors: TBA". SQLAlchemy is how SQL building and ORM should be done, in Python. For

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-20 Thread binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 23:24:04 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote: On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:58:37 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: [...] There are a number of things out there, but personally don't know there state or simplicity. 2016 there was a talk: http://dconf.org/2016/talks/nowak.html

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 15:58:37 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote: [...] There are a number of things out there, but personally don't know there state or simplicity. 2016 there was a talk: http://dconf.org/2016/talks/nowak.html But personally I preferred this one:

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-20 Thread Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 15:58 +, Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d- learn wrote: > On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 02:30:16 UTC, binghoo dang wrote: > > hi, > > > > I thinks D need an ORM library for Sqlite/Mysql/PostgreSQL, > > entity currently support all the three tar

Re: D need an ORM library!

2018-08-20 Thread Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Monday, 20 August 2018 at 02:30:16 UTC, binghoo dang wrote: hi, I thinks D need an ORM library for Sqlite/Mysql/PostgreSQL, entity currently support all the three targets, but entity's API is too complex and cumbersome for using. Is there a more light-weight and simpler implementation

D need an ORM library!

2018-08-19 Thread binghoo dang via Digitalmars-d-learn
hi, I thinks D need an ORM library for Sqlite/Mysql/PostgreSQL, entity currently support all the three targets, but entity's API is too complex and cumbersome for using. Is there a more light-weight and simpler implementation like ActiveAndroid ? Thanks! --- Binghoo Dang