On Thursday, March 08, 2018 08:36:09 Nordlöw via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Is using
>
> https://dlang.org/changelog/2.079.0.html#default_after_variadic
>
> for instance as
>
> void show(Args...)(Args args,
> string file = __FILE__,
> uint line = __LINE__,
Is using
https://dlang.org/changelog/2.079.0.html#default_after_variadic
for instance as
void show(Args...)(Args args,
string file = __FILE__,
uint line = __LINE__,
string fun = __FUNCTION__)
if (Args.length >= 1)
{
...
}
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 08:04:54 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
Interesting. I was using vibe.d 'v0.8.3-rc.1' (which doesn't
appear to work on run.dlang.io). But it does seem to work for
me if I use 'v0.8.3-alpha.1'.
I wonder what could have changed to result in this?
It's a
On 03/08/2018 01:13 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
That does seem odd.
---
/+dub.sdl:
dependency "vibe-d" version="~>0.8.3-alpha.1"
+/
import vibe.core.net;
import std.stdio;
TCPConnection mySocket;
void main() {
auto b = mySocket is null;
writeln(b);
}
---
works fine on run.dlang.io
On 03/08/2018 03:04 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
Interesting. I was using vibe.d 'v0.8.3-rc.1' (which doesn't appear to
work on run.dlang.io). But it does seem to work for me if I use
'v0.8.3-alpha.1'.
I wonder what could have changed to result in this?
On Friday, 9 February 2018 at 20:19:33 UTC, Dennis wrote:
I'd still like to find a nice way to generate the boilerplate
code for dynamic loading, if I come up with something I'll post
it here.
So I ended up using an import library for a while, but I then
wanted to get the handle of the DLL,
On 3/8/18 1:00 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
On 03/08/2018 12:05 AM, ketmar wrote:
Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
I'm having trouble finding the documentation for what exactly the
unary "not" operator does when applied to a class/interface object.
Does this documentation exist
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 13:26:06 UTC, Alex wrote:
From this point of view, size_t is not fixed, but capable to
point to any place in memory.
Therefore, pointer of any type have by definition exactly the
defined size of size_t.
Thank you,I thougth that pointer aliasing wasn't allowed.
On Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 21:39:09 UTC, Apocalypto wrote:
Are there any tutorials about D in vscode?
Which are the minimal plugins to install to have code
completion, syntax highlighting and code formatting?
Are there any app templates that i can invoke to not start
every project from
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:06:05 UTC, Marc wrote:
How do I define the callback so that it can be used in
RegisterWaitForSingleObject()?
I've tried pass as argument:
myFunc
myFunc.ptr
none worked. Here's my code:
[...]
Function call:
[...]
Error:
[...]
Solved! I shall rather
How do I define the callback so that it can be used in
RegisterWaitForSingleObject()?
I've tried pass as argument:
myFunc
myFunc.ptr
none worked. Here's my code:
extern (C) void OnExited(void* context, BOOLEAN isTimeOut);
extern(Windows):
BOOL RegisterWaitForSingleObject(
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:03:18 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
symbol __imp_fmodf referenced in function "void __cdecl
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
__imp_fmodf referenced in function "void __cdecl
YGRoundToPixelGrid(struct YGNode * const,float,float,float)"
On 2018-03-08 17:24:32 +, kinke said:
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 17:03:18 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Using Dub and pretty simple setup, that links in 3 C/C++ static
libraries, I get these linker errors:
libyogacore.lib(Yoga.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
__imp_fmodf
On 2018-03-08 16:03:57 +, Adam D. Ruppe said:
How are you accessing it? If it is by pointer only passing it to
methods, you can simply:
struct my_cpp_struct;
and define functions:
extern(C)
void foo(my_cpp_struct* arg);
Hi, :-/ seems I was a bit confused by all the backs and forth on
On 03/08/2018 05:31 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 3/8/18 1:00 AM, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
But are we CERTAIN that's all there is to it? I have a non-reduced
situation right now where outputting the address of a class reveals a
non-null address, and yet
On Friday, 9 March 2018 at 01:22:15 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
I would like to know if this can be improved to support the
following:
* binary assignment operators (e.g. +=)
* unary assignment operators (e.g. ++)
* @safe, @nogc, and -betterC compatible
* at least as good code generation as
I read where shared classes have not been implemented yet. So I'm
using
just a struct e below: But the output below is showing that
sharing is
not happening between Struct in main() and the various spawned
threads.
I'm I doing something wrong?
creating queue in EventBuffer constructor
On Tuesday, 20 February 2018 at 14:34:53 UTC, bauss wrote:
Would there be a reason why this wouldn't be a good
implementation?
If so what and how could it be improved?
Are there flaws in an implementation like this?
[... snip ...]
I am very interested in this as a potential alternative to
On Thursday, 8 March 2018 at 15:51:53 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
I have a pretty complex struct with C++ typed private members
etc. in it which I want to use from D.
How are you accessing it? If it is by pointer only passing it to
methods, you can simply:
struct my_cpp_struct;
and define
I have a pretty complex struct with C++ typed private members etc. in
it which I want to use from D.
Obviously I don't want to/can't rebuild the struct definiton in D and I
don't need access to all the members just some simple C API ones are
enough.
How can I get access to this struct from
On Tuesday, 6 March 2018 at 09:01:55 UTC, Vino wrote:
On Monday, 5 March 2018 at 13:50:28 UTC, Vino wrote:
[...]
Hi All,
On further analysis, as to why the function deleteAgedDir is
not getting executed, found that if this function finds a
folder to be deleted then it should delete the
22 matches
Mail list logo
