On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 06:23:08 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 22:07:56 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 18:52:45 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
I'm sorry I didn't follow.
You mean like:
"dub test"
??
I dont pass anything to the -b or -c flag if that'
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 07:06:03 UTC, Aliak wrote:
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 06:23:08 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 22:07:56 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 18:52:45 UTC, Andre Pany wrote:
[...]
I'm sorry I didn't follow.
You mean like:
"dub test"
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 22:05:20 UTC, aliak wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 19:00:55 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 09:38:59 UTC, aliak wrote:
Then I run this dub dustmite command:
dub dustmite -b unittest ../dubdust --compiler-regex="never
matches"
I have had
Hi,
Background: I chose to rewrite a Python/PySide2/Qt application in
X/GTK+. After much dithering I was pushed to Rust/gtk-rs/GTK+ and set
to it. Then I decided to do D/GtkD/GTK+ as well.
Totally unscientific, biased, and indeed prejudiced result is that D is
a nicer programming language to work
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:56 AM Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Background: I chose to rewrite a Python/PySide2/Qt application in
> X/GTK+. After much dithering I was pushed to Rust/gtk-rs/GTK+ and set
> to it. Then I decided to do D/GtkD/GTK+ as well.
>
> Totally unscien
I've now got it to work but it is unusable!
It can show small numbers of rows with no problem.
However, if it has to show 100s of rows it expands the tree
vertically way beyond the bottom of the screen and is impossible
to navigate.
However, if it has to show 1000s of rows it goes into an in
I renamed the class shown in my previous post from View to
InnerView, then created a new View class:
class View : ScrolledWindow {
import qtrac.debfind.modelutil: NameAndDescription;
InnerView innerView;
this() {
super();
innerView = new InnerView;
addWithVi
With the new code if I have 1000s of rows I get this error:
(DebFind:8087): Gdk-ERROR **: 11:50:46.787: The program 'DebFind'
received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'.
(Details: serial 8810
: dub build
Performing "debug" build using
/home/mark/opt/ldc2-1.21.0-linux-x86_64/bin/ldc2 for x86_64.
aaset 0.2.5: target for configuration "library" is up to date.
gtk-d:gtkd 3.9.0: target for configuration "library" is up to
date.
debfind ~master: target for configuration "application" is u
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 09:09:04 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 09:30:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 18:52:55 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
Just curious, how do you handle the whole RC> story
in Gtk-rs?
For me it made the point that la
I'm getting a crash when I add 1000s of rows to a tree (up to
100s seems to work ok).
The source code is here:
https://github.com/mark-summerfield/debfind
Note that this will only build and run on a Debian or
Debian-derived system (e.g., Ubuntu).
I am pretty well reaching the point of giving
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 11:27:57 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Sunday, 26 April 2020 at 09:09:04 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 at 09:30:44 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On Friday, 24 April 2020 at 18:52:55 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
Just curious, how do you handle the
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:56:09AM +, mark via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Thread 1 "DebFind" received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
The GC sends that signal to pause other threads when it is about to
collect. You can tell gdb to just ignore it.
handle SIGUSR1 noprint
handle SIGUSR2
Hi:
In dlang core.thread.osthread has below code, the 654 line
code i can understand why write () first, and {m_fn = fn;}() do
what?
```
this( void function() fn, size_t sz = 0 ) @safe pure nothrow
@nogc
647 in
648 {
649 assert( fn );
650 }
651 do
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 13:29:08 UTC, lilijreey wrote:
Hi:
In dlang core.thread.osthread has below code, the 654 line
code i can understand why write () first, and {m_fn = fn;}()
do what?
The stdlib uses that pattern from time to time to indicate an
unsafe block in an otherwise safe
Hello,
could you try what the error message suggest you to do:
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 12:03:18 UTC, mark wrote:
(Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported
asynchronously;
that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it.
To debug your program, run it with th
I took Adam's advice about .gdbinit and now it runs in gdb.
When I ran the program I did Find 'memoize' which worked. Then
'memoize python' which also worked. Then said to find 'any word'
(which produces 1000s of rows) at which point it crashed. Below
is the bt. Does it look like my bug or a G
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 12:26:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:56:09AM +, mark via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
Thread 1 "DebFind" received signal SIGUSR1, User defined
signal 1.
The GC sends that signal to pause other threads when it is
about to collect. You can
The stdlib uses that pattern from time to time to indicate an
unsafe block in an otherwise safe function.
Specifically it is a little trusted inline function being
immediately called.
It is something that should be avoided whenever you can.
Thanks your help. where is unsafe in above code?
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 13:36:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 13:29:08 UTC, lilijreey wrote:
Hi:
In dlang core.thread.osthread has below code, the 654 line
code i can understand why write () first, and {m_fn = fn;}()
do what?
The stdlib uses that pattern from
27.04.2020 18:28, data pulverizer пишет:
I'm probably not the first person to say this but. Isn't @trusted an odd
label to give unsafe functions and open to abuse by unscrupulous
programmers? It almost says "nothing to see, this here piece of code is
a-ok". Shouldn't it be explicitly labelled a
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 15:24:09 UTC, lilijreey wrote:
Thanks your help. where is unsafe in above code?
It depends on the context but I assume it is because it is
storing a reference to the function across thread boundaries,
something normally banned, but since it is (I believe) a private
When using a template with multiple functions within it, is it
possible to access the underlying functions directly? Not sure I
am missing anything, but what works when the functions are named
differently from the headline template doesn't work when the
functions are named the same.
import st
On 4/27/20 1:19 PM, jmh530 wrote:
When using a template with multiple functions within it, is it possible
to access the underlying functions directly? Not sure I am missing
anything, but what works when the functions are named differently from
the headline template doesn't work when the functio
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 05:19:35PM +, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> When using a template with multiple functions within it, is it
> possible to access the underlying functions directly?
Yes, but only if the template is not eponymous.
> Not sure I am missing anything, but what work
On Monday, 27 April 2020 at 17:40:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
[snip]
Thanks for that. Very detailed.
In terms of a use case, we just added a center function to mir
[1]. It can take an alias to a function. I wanted to add a check
that the arity of the function was 1, but it turned out
26 matches
Mail list logo
