On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:22:19 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit
>>
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 01:08:11 UTC, Manu wrote:
FWIW, I'm disappointed with the quality of my dman shirt; I've
put it
through the wash no more than 3-4 times and the print is
aggressively
deteriorating with each wash.
I don't tend to wear it because it's disintegrating so fast.
I'm
On 10/21/18 1:13 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 04:15 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
That's pure nonsense: It's Linux - unless one option actually goes
away
(KDE is still actively used and developed), then there's no such
thing
as one "winning"
On 10/21/18 7:36 AM, Andre Pany wrote:
While talking about bindings, do not forget Delphi. It has still a good
eco system. Combining Delphi's advanced Runtime reflection capabilities
with D's advanced compile reflection capabilities opens this eco system.
I created a proof of concept and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11904
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5749
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On 10/21/18 1:29 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
No, D should not forget DWT. It's one of the few (they only?) D GUI
toolkit that has a native look and feel.
Apart from GtkD on GTK+ systems, and dqml, QtE5, qtD, and dqt on Qt,
and wxD on wxWidgets. Qt and wxWidgets pride themselves on being able
to
On 10/20/18 11:17 PM, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not others in a
module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
I've always felt the
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 09:51:28AM +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 22:19:31 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> > Haha, I feel so silly now. NDK r13b does not seem to have the
> > sysroot subdir required by the clang build command, that's why it
> > couldn't find
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 04:41:08 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 10/21/18 1:13 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
[...]
First of all, minor nitpick: Unless some bombshell news
occurred that I managed to miss, Ubuntu pushes their own Unity,
NOT Gnome. Yes, that's still GTK, but
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1861
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
On 10/21/18 11:59 PM, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:05:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
I'm afraid I'm not familiar with socket.io, and the homepage doesn't
seem to tell me much (it doesn't even say whether it uses TCP or UDP).
But that said, in D, the gold-standard
On 10/21/18 4:58 PM, Fleel wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:41:41 UTC, JN wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:14:46 UTC, Fleel wrote:
Does anyone know of a good D alternative for the socket.IO server
(https://socket.io)? I would like to transition my server from
node.js to D, but I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
Nathan S. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n8sh.second...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4485
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:05:06 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not familiar with socket.io, and the homepage doesn't
> seem to tell me much (it doesn't even say whether it uses TCP or UDP).
> But that said, in D, the gold-standard for pretty much *anything*
> related to
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 2:35 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> > On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >> Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
> >> other direction, which is not part of the
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:23:35 UTC, aliak wrote:
Hi, I'm playing around with a recursive template type that
allows for named template parameters. The problem is that it
requires a lot of repetition and becomes more error prone as
the number of named arguments increase. So
1) Any
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
foundation too...
We've got a store coming, with t-shirts and other items. D-man
shirts will not be there, though.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:15 PM Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 12:04:16 -0700, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >> Note that there may well be a good way to get the good properties of MP
> >> without
On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written, presumably by
casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've got a
data race with the other existing unshared aliases.
If such a race is possible, then the @trusted
On 21.10.18 21:04, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
existing unshared aliases.
You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
> >> Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written,
> >> presumably by
> >> casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've
> >> got a
> >> data
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:32:35 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This only works if untrusted programmers (i.e. programmers who
are only allowed to write/modify @safe code) are not allowed to
change your class. I.e. it does not work.
This is the basis of the current @safe/@trusted/@system model.
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
On 10/21/2018 4:12 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:32:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
Yes, but the problem you describe is arises from implicit conversion in the
other
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:50 PM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2018 4:12 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 21:32:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> >> On 10/21/2018 2:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> >>> On 10/21/2018 12:20 PM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
>
On 22.10.18 02:46, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/pqii8k$11u3$1...@digitalmars.com
On 22.10.18 02:45, Manu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written, presumably by
casting it to unshared in @trusted code. As soon as that is done, you've got a
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:40 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 21:04, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >>>
> As soon as that is done, you've got a data race
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:46:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
That's what I was referring to, and Manu's example. It doesn't
work, as I pointed out.
I'm pretty sure it does, but please repeat it.
We will eventually. This started as a "please point out any
problems with this" and has
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:55 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 22.10.18 02:45, Manu wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.10.18 20:46, Manu wrote:
> Shared data is only useful if, at some point, it is read/written,
>
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 5:35 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 20:04:02 UTC, Fleel wrote:
> > It would be awesome if there were T-Shirts with D-man on them.
> > I would totally buy one, and would help to support the
> > foundation too...
>
> We've got a
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:55:00 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 22.10.18 02:46, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2018 at 00:38:33 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I just did,
Link please?
https://forum.dlang.org/post/pqii8k$11u3$1...@digitalmars.com
That contains no code.
Not all of
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 09:08:32 UTC, Vijay Nayar wrote:
Technically the code you have is syntactically correct. You
are permitted to create a class variable without assigning it
to a class object. (Assigning it to a class object would look
like "A a = new A();")
Which section of The
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 15:40:07 UTC, karis njiru wrote:
Hi. Am a computer science student from Kenya and decided to use
D for my class project on Principles of Programming Languages.
Am having a lot of fun with D but have come across an issue. I
have been using Visual D for the past 2
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:35:38 -0700, Manu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:15 PM Neia Neutuladh via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>> If we only used your proposal and only used @safe code, we wouldn't
>> have any data races, but that's only because we wouldn't have any
>> shared data. We'd have shared
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 23:38 +, Gregor Mückl via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
[…]
> I don't want to judge, but I need to point out that we have
> managed to make this discussion progress from outward-facing
> marketing to technical difficulties and related pull requests.
> This is not bad, but it
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 21:12 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> This is a VERY important thing, and it's true for many of us (myself
> included). This why it was a HUGE mistake when the community decided
> it
> should become taboo to promote D as a redesigned
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 21:25 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> And KDE.
Not entirely true, you can run KDE application on a GNOME system, and I
assume GNOME application on a KDE system.
> I've heard a lot of very good things about GtkD, and honestly, I have
>
On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 05:47 +, Joakim via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> Simple, C++ is increasingly seen as irrelevant by those choosing
> a new language, so D's real competition is now Go, Rust, Swift,
> Nim, Zig, etc. These are people who want to write "fast code
> fast," well except
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 16:37 +, Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> […]
>
> It turns out that translating C++ is *hard*. Partly because the
> language is huge and complicated, but also partly because
> libclang isn't all it's cracked up to be. But... dpp is probably
> a few full work
On 10/21/18 3:33 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 21:25 -0400, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I've heard a lot of very good things about GtkD, and honestly, I have
no
doubts about any of it. Unfortunately though, the main problem with
GtkD
is simply GTK itself
On 21/10/2018 10:41 PM, Manu wrote:
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 2:05 am Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d,
mailto:digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>> wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:30 AM, Manu wrote:
> You can write an invalid program in any imaginable number of ways;
> that's just not an
On 10/20/2018 11:24 AM, Manu wrote:
This is an unfair dismissal.
It has nothing at all to do with fairness. It is about what the type system
guarantees in @safe code. To repeat, the current type system guarantees in @safe
code that T* and shared(T)* do not point to the same memory location.
On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 15:10:38 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:
are there more zero-initializations that can be optimized in
std.experimental.allocator?
I looked and identified low-hanging fruit in
std.mutation.initializeAll & moveEmplace and in
std.typecons.RefCounted (PR #6698), and in
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19321
--- Comment #2 from Stanislav Blinov ---
I propose to still make the change, but also add a note about outstanding bugs
(IIRC there was another one concerning assignment of fields). At least that way
the spec will not be misleading.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
--- Comment #1 from Tiberiu Lepadatu ---
(In reply to ZombineDev from comment #0)
> Since core.internal.hash.hashOf is a template, there are a number potential
> benefits:
> * better performance (e.g. more opportunities for inlining, less
>
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:24 AM, Manu wrote:
This is an unfair dismissal.
It has nothing at all to do with fairness. It is about what the
type system guarantees in @safe code. To repeat, the current
type system guarantees in @safe code
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:58:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
You can if no-one else writes to it, which is the whole point
of Manu's proposal. Perhaps it should be const shared instead
of shared but still.
There is no purpose whatsoever to
On 10/21/18 1:47 AM, Joakim wrote:
Simple, C++ is increasingly seen as irrelevant by those choosing a new
language, so D's real competition is now Go, Rust, Swift, Nim, Zig, etc.
These are people who want to write "fast code fast," well except for
Rust users, who value ownership more.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 03:17:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 07:33:45 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
The GTK/Qt battle on Linux was won by GTK+2 hence GNOME over
KDE as the default for Debian and Fedora. Whether this was
right or wrong is left as a choice for the reader!
Linux is not only the desktop, and Qt simply dominates
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 2:05 am Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10/20/2018 11:30 AM, Manu wrote:
> > You can write an invalid program in any imaginable number of ways;
> > that's just not an interesting discussion.
>
> What we're discussing is not an
On 2018-10-21 09:33, Russel Winder wrote:
The SWT framework is being replaced with JavaFX, so should D forget DWT
and do something similar?
Where do you get that idea? SWT (and therefore DWT) is using the native
drawing operations of the OS.
No, D should not forget DWT. It's one of the few
On 2018-10-21 03:25, Nick Sabalausky (Abscissa) wrote:
What about DWT? It seemed pretty good from what I could tell, though I
still haven't ventured into D GUIs just yet myself. Are there issues
people have with DWT? Or WxD?
DWT is currently stuck at SWT version 3.4 and no macOS version is
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19264
dcua...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcua...@yahoo.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
dcua...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcua...@yahoo.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6106
dcua...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcua...@yahoo.com
Stanislav, Ali, Mike -- Thank you all for your thoughtful and
helpful replies to my queries. Apologies that it has taken this
long to reply to you. I still haven't been able to find time to
go through all of the code examples provided but hope to do so
later this week. If I have additional
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19323
Issue ID: 19323
Summary: Pure function nesting explanation; move to correct
spot in specs
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18728
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19316
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
On Thursday, 20 September 2018 at 10:48:35 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
What's the fix? Have the compiler insert a call to the
exception's destructor at the end of the `catch(scope
Exception)` block.
If I understood you correctly then we have same idea. If
exception is not handled or re thrown
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19264
Eduard Staniloiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
CC|
On 10/20/2018 11:30 AM, Manu wrote:
You can write an invalid program in any imaginable number of ways;
that's just not an interesting discussion.
What we're discussing is not an invalid program, but what guarantees the type
system can provide.
D's current type system guarantees that a T*
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19283
Eduard Staniloiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19321
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18998
Cristian Creteanu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cristiancretean...@gmail.co
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19294
Cristian Creteanu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cristiancretean...@gmail.co
On 2018-10-20 11:25, Russel Winder wrote:
GtkD works very well for me. But I guess GTK+ has a reputation of not
working on Windows and macOS. Once a reputation is established it is
nigh on impossible to refute.
As has been stated elsewhere, it's working on Windows and macOS but
looks very
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:58:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
You can if no-one else writes to it, which is the whole point
of Manu's proposal. Perhaps it should be const shared instead
of shared but still.
There is no purpose whatsoever to
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 01:32:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
(Abscissa) wrote:
On 10/20/18 6:28 AM, Gregor Mückl wrote:
Even though web and mobile UIs seem to be the rage at the
moment, I believe a solid support for desktop UIs is very
important for a general purpose language, if it wants to
On 2018-10-20 17:40, karis njiru wrote:
Hi. Am a computer science student from Kenya and decided to use D for my
class project on Principles of Programming Languages. Am having a lot of
fun with D but have come across an issue. I have been using Visual D for
the past 2 months for my coding but
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18290
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 12:45:43 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 05:47:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Synchronized with what? You still have `a`, which isn't
`shared` and doesn't require any
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 03:17:23 UTC, 12345swordy wrote:
So that classes can share some of their variables but not
others in a module.
IE.
class A
{
internal int A; //This is shared in the module
private int B; // But not this.
}
No need to reintroduce the "Friend" feature from cpp.
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 13:24:49 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 11:25:16 UTC, aliak wrote:
When I say ok, I mean assuming the implementer actually wrote
correct code. This applies to any shared method today as well.
This ("ok") can only be achieved if the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19294
Eduard Staniloiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
Eduard Staniloiu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
CC|
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:04:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/20/2018 11:30 AM, Manu wrote:
You can write an invalid program in any imaginable number of
ways;
that's just not an interesting discussion.
What we're discussing is not an invalid program, but what
guarantees the type
On Friday, 19 October 2018 at 17:34:10 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
[...]
Well done!
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 05:47:14 UTC, Manu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 10:10 AM Stanislav Blinov via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Synchronized with what? You still have `a`, which isn't
`shared` and doesn't require any atomic access or
synchronization. At this point it doesn't matter if
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19324
Issue ID: 19324
Summary: Code ")<" does not respect the coding
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8025
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3129
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18499
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18571
Tiberiu Lepadatu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com
--- Comment
On 2018-10-21 19:29, Russel Winder wrote:
But who apart from Eclipse and JetBrains uses Java for desktop GUI
applications?
There's probably a ton of business/enterprise applications that are
written in Java.
But I don't care for that, that's why I'm using D :)
I do not have Eclipse to
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19316
Stanislav Blinov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
On Sun., 21 Oct. 2018, 2:55 am Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d,
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2018 11:24 AM, Manu wrote:
> > This is an unfair dismissal.
>
> It has nothing at all to do with fairness. It is about what the type system
> guarantees in @safe code. To repeat, the current type system guarantees
DIP 1000 says:
Delegates currently defensively allocate closures with the GC.
Few actually escape, and with scope only those that actually
escape need to have the closures allocated.
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1000.md#benefits
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:00 AM Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 10/20/2018 11:08 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> > You can if no-one else writes to it, which is the whole point of Manu's
> > proposal. Perhaps it should be const shared instead of shared but still.
>
> There is no
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:11:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2018-10-18 01:15, Jon Degenhardt wrote:
I need to use docker to build static linked Linux executables.
My reason
is specific, may be different than the OP's. I'm using
Travis-CI to
build executables. Travis-CI uses Ubuntu
I'd like to add that if the compiler can prove that a T* points to a unique T,
then it can be implicitly cast to shared(T)*. And it does so, like the result of
.dup can be so converted.
On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
existing unshared aliases.
You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The onus is on the
programmer to make that correct, same with regular @safe/@trusted@system
code.
Not all
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:00 PM Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>
> On 21.10.18 17:54, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
> >
> >> As soon as that is done, you've got a data race with the other
> >> existing unshared aliases.
> >
> > You're in @trusted code, that is the whole point. The onus is on the
>
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 09:50:09 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Manu's Proposal ---
@safe:
int i;
int* a =
StartNewThread(a); // Compiles! Coder has no idea!
... in the new thread ...
void StartOfNewThread(shared(int)* b) {
... we have two threads accessing 'i',
one thinks it is
On Sunday, 21 October 2018 at 18:45:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd like to add that if the compiler can prove that a T* points
to a unique T, then it can be implicitly cast to shared(T)*.
And it does so, like the result of .dup can be so converted.
This can be achieved by using the unique
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
