On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 00:54:33 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/5/2014 5:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So I'm looking at creation functions and in particular
creation functions for
arrays.
My bikeshed color comments:
2. why make instead of construct or factory?
Or build ?
I've watched all transmissions and I liked 'em all (without any
exception).
And I think the end of the conference should be a beginning of
the new trend here.
So instead of wait for DConf 2015, all those speakers should do
more videos (at home etc.) sharing their thoughts.
Matheus.
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 13:27:20 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
No one wants to work on GDC/LDC, so they shall remain obscure in
development and tailing behind current development.
Please could you tell more about the requirements/background that
a person needs to fill this
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 16:22:22 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
For LDC it should be quite easy. :-)
First, build LDC from source. Instructions are here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/Building_LDC_from_source. Building LLVM
from source it not a requirement but helps in tracking down
problems.
Thanks
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 at 16:32:54 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 4 June 2014 16:44, MattCoder via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
For a (needs more detail) overview, see:
http://gdcproject.org/contributing/
There's also a projects page:
http://wiki.dlang.org
Well, some managers are mindless and that story about do it now
or we will lose our customer, in most cases it's just a
bluff/threat or call it what you want.
The customers usually don't change their software like they
change bakery if the bread is horrible. There are many costs
envolved in
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 06:48:39 UTC, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
... But here is a possible idea:
Trees...
...Thoughts? Do other people here have homework ideas?
Yes this is interesting idead. -But If I remember well, he said
to send him an e-mail with ideas. So I think you should point him
On Saturday, 7 June 2014 at 17:45:46 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I will. I just wanted to see what other ideas people here could
find.
And I'm really glad that you did here, because as a D learner it
will be nice to see those ideas.
Matheus.
On Monday, 9 June 2014 at 22:37:20 UTC, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
So pyd is at the point where it really needs some sort of test
suite runner.
* multiple versions of python (2.4 - 3.4, but I'm thinking of
dropping 2.4 and 2.5 this year)
Well done! -If you want a suggestion I think you should
There is an article on reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/27r6v1/jurassic_park_trespasser_cg_source_code_review/
Which is making some noise there, and one thing that called my
attention was about the compilation time, back then (90's) it
could consume a considerable amount
On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 at 18:19:02 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
I think porting 300k lines of 15+ year-old, heavily-templated
C++ would
have to be a labor of love. You certainly couldn't pay me to
do it.
I understand your point, but like I said on my post, I'm using
this game as example, this
On Sunday, 15 June 2014 at 20:53:58 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I'm going to try my hand at making a game with 2.066...
It will be open-source? Can you tell what type of game you have
in mind?
Matheus.
On Monday, 16 June 2014 at 10:24:46 UTC, John Petal wrote:
Is it possible – for example – to write a simple 2D game, or an
automation program, or a text editor in D?
Speaking by myself, I was able to write both: Game and Text
Editor, using Derelict2 and Cairo respectively.
PS: I know the
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 04:03:23 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On 6/17/2014 12:16 PM, Caligo via Digitalmars-d wrote:
My rant wasn't about his lack of fluency in the English
language. You
only learn once what a sentence is, and the concept translates
over to
most other natural languages. The
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 15:42:04 UTC, Etienne wrote:
it would be a little more practical to be able to write
writeln(obj.member?.nested?.val);
If one of these: member, nested or val == null, what will happen
with writeln()? It will print null or it will be avoided?
Matheus.
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 19:04:34 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... This means that if the one of the components is null, the
entire expression needs to return a value of this type,
presumably the `.init` value.
I got it! Thanks.
Matheus.
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 13:14:04 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
write, printf etc. performance is benchmarked also - so not
clear
if pnoise is super-fast but write is super-slow etc...
Indeed and using Windows (At least 8), the size of command-window
(CMD) interferes in the result
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 16:02:56 UTC, bearophile wrote:
So this is the best so far version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8dae9b359f27
Just one note, with the last version of DMD:
dmd -O -noboundscheck -inline -release pnoise.d
pnoise.d(42): Error: pure function
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 18:32:22 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
it does not makes sense to optmized this example more and
more - it should be fast with the original version (except the
missing finals on the virtuals)
Oh please, let him continue, I'm really learning a lot with these
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 18:29:35 UTC, Mattcoder wrote:
On Friday, 20 June 2014 at 16:02:56 UTC, bearophile wrote:
So this is the best so far version:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8dae9b359f27
Just one note, with the last version of DMD:
dmd -O -noboundscheck -inline -release pnoise.d
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 11:56:43 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I was talking to the designer I work with at my day job about
my working on a new D site, and he actually put together a logo
for me over lunch.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/g7htvw3q61nas5z/D-logo.svg
What does everyone think of
On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 20:04:50 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
The 'new' design by w0rp (http://w0rp.com:8010/) does none of
those things. He's well intentioned but even things like basic
text layout and white space usage are completely lacking.
I didn't notice that link before, and if on
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 06:40:40 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
... or we should roll our own. And I don't think that rolling
our own would be that hard.
I'm with you. I think Disqus is for those who don't know how or
don't want to write this kind of mechanism. I think this
community has
On Monday, 3 November 2014 at 21:11:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
and then meeting for beers. -- Andrei
Be aware that he doesn't drink (alcohol) too much:
https://twitter.com/Jonathan_Blow/status/515268581525700608
Matheus.
On Tuesday, 2 December 2014 at 00:13:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
One interesting tidbit is that downloads have been rising
sharply through mid-November, to have a bit of a pullback
recently: http://erdani.com/d/downloads.daily.png
One note about this: I'm using D in my projects since
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:11:37 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
... i'm accepting the fact that D is doomed to be a toy, which
ocasionally used here and there. i tried to fight with this,
but this fight is lost before it's started. and now i surrender.
Well I don't post too much
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 03:50:59 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
I started writing a small booklet on this, if you got an email
if you're interested or some way to send you. Please let me
know.
Do you mind to share with us all? :)
Matheus.
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 at 05:48:27 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-EiBquZktsLc0czUzZVeGlLM00/view?usp=sharing
No guarantees of how long it'll stay up there.
And to reiterate, its only just a start. And I don't know if I
ever complete it. There isn't really
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 11:12:04 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
...
I have about 10 pages to go. Uses cases, 1 design pattern,
bunch of exploring of language support (LISP) and some misc
stuff. So maybe sooner rather then later there will be an
announcement.
Please let us know!
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 17:00:56 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
Its hard to find your email!
Email me? alphaglosined // gmail // com
Done! :)
Matheus.
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 14:51:54 UTC, Théo Bueno wrote:
Anyway this benchmark and these numbers are crap, using the
provided makefile I have totally different results on my laptop.
According to the site:
...Feel free to submit improvements to the implementations!
:)
Matheus.
On Saturday, 20 December 2014 at 21:47:24 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2pvf68/armv7_vs_x8664_pathfinding_benchmark_of_c_d_go/
Please take a look at this and ensure that the benchmark code
is using D correctly...
There is already a topic about this:
On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 17:40:13 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
By this time last year, dconf 2014 preparations were already
under way but I haven't heard anything this year. Is another
one planned?
Are you going to present us with more classics slides? :)
http://m.imgur.com/hHCN3OL
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 17:19:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The templates and operator overloads did all the work in
showing the web responses. That's kinda cool.
Indeed very cool, well done!
Matheus.
Hi,
Not mine, just sharing:
reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2qaxvs/gbaid_a_gameboy_advance_emulator_in_d/
github: https://github.com/DDoS/GBAiD
Matheus.
Hi,
I found an article today on reddit which I think it would be nice
to share:
http://hookrace.net/blog/what-is-special-about-nim/#good-performance
I'm pointing out this link because I think D should have some
articles like this too. It's comprehensive and it seems popular
to gather
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 at 01:16:39 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
Why doesn't the equals operator work on the InternetAddress
class?
It fails as the example below:
import std.stdio;
class foo{}
void main(){
auto a = new foo;
auto b = new foo;
assert(a == b);
}
I believe you need to
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 at 01:59:40 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
I believe you need to compare the values inside those class
right?
I forgot to paste an example:
import std.stdio;
class foo{
int i = 0;
bool opEquals(foo obj){ return this.i == obj.i;}
}
void main(){
auto a = new foo;
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 at 16:39:05 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
Using toAddrString results in the following steps:
1. Allocate memory for the InternetAddress (GC memory by the
way)
2. Convert the uint address to an IP Address string
3. Convert the ushort port to a string.
4. Do steps 1-3
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 at 17:37:19 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
my question was, should the InterenetAddress class have an
opEquals or an opCmp or were they ommitted on purpose?
Yes I understood your problem and like I said on the previous
post I'm interested on the answer from the
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 18:08:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
So H.S. Teoh awesomely took
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2878 to
completion. We now have a working and fast relational group
by facility.
See it at work!
#!/usr/bin/rdmd
void main()
{
On Wednesday, 14 January 2015 at 22:29:09 UTC, bearophile wrote:
According to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B14#Function_return_type_deduction
C++14 is able to compile code like this:
auto correct(int i) {
if (i == 1)
return i;
else
return correct(i -
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 00:24:09 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 January 2015 at 00:13:38 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
So could you please tell me a good use case to for using
return
type deduction?
Templates.
Thanks! - In fact after posting I took a look and found this:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 15:28:57 UTC, Mathias LANG wrote:
http://w0rp.com:8010/
I don't know about others but for me the layout above looks more
attractive than the actual one.
In fact yesterday I was showing the main page for a friend on his
smartphone (Moto G), and the code
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:29:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Take a look at http://dlang.org. New menus are in place for the
main site and library.
Well let be honest the site was in need of some fresh air. And
the new menu is really good. Congratulations.
Matheus.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 23:04:40 UTC, ponce wrote:
Does IE7/IE8 are to be supported or IE9+ is the target? (IE9+
is more pleasant).
Please let's bury those 2 altogether with IE9. :)
Matheus.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:41:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Content discussion to follow soon. -- Andrei
As I asked in another Topic without any answer, I wasn't able to
find (or at least is not easily visible) anything related to
CONTRIBUTE even on sitemap.
I think there should
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:19:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/15 6:09 PM, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:41:04 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Content discussion to follow soon. -- Andrei
As I asked in another Topic without any answer, I wasn't able
to
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:34:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
With all this discussion on more dynamic content on dlang.org,
I sat down (figuratively; I've been on a hike today) and
thought - what is dynamic about D?
Are you becoming a web-developer? :)
We already have twitter which
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:18:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
TL;DR: I've uploaded new menu colors at http://erdani.com/d/,
this time aiming for a more martian red ethos. Please let me
know.
Well I'd prefer less red-ish: http://i.imgur.com/AIvcoWl.png
But you know this is a personal
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 03:01:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
No personal aspect to this. What hex colors did you use? --
background-color: #6E6E6E;
And I cleaned:
#cssmenu ul li a {
font-size: 14px;
display: block;
background:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 13:47:11 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void function foo () { ... }
foo();
do you see the subtle difference? yes, that tiny whitespace in
declaration. i borrowed that habit from some Oberon code
decades ago, and it serves me well since then.
Hmm,
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
z
+1. I didn't like it either. But then again, the majority of
people
rarely agree with me, so I didn't say anything. But obviously
I'm not
alone in disliking this spaced-out layout.
Well, of course it needs
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:52:56 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
Suggested improvement:
http://imgur.com/a/zgSJa
Or: http://i.imgur.com/ciSn8vM.png
Matheus.
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:47:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:27:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 13:38:25 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 13:28:22 UTC, Tofu Ninja
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 14:46:22 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I basically took the
`do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
http://dlang.skoppe.eu
Well like everyone else said, this is awesome.
I
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:29:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Suggestion: The font-style used in one menu differs from the
other, ex:
http://i.imgur.com/fRwdFNj.png
Which I think it should be the same, and as you can see in the
image above, some words doesn't fit in the menu
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:57:25 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 05:52:06PM +, MattCoder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 17:34:46 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
z
+1. I didn't like it either. But then again
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 19:51:57 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 1/21/2015 6:46 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Just for fun and proof-of-concept I went ahead and forked the
dlang.org site. I
basically took the `do-what-everybody-else-is-doing` approach:
Thank you very much for doing this!
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hello all
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
able to put some design together for it. please see it at
http://bit.ly/1DTLuPS and let us know what
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 19:35:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A tested PR would be great. Who can take this? -- Andrei
A last note about this: using width:1024px will fix the mobile
wrap-text problem, but the site will look like this on higher
resolutions:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 17:59:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
In fact yesterday I was showing the main page for a friend on
his
smartphone (Moto G), and the code example at main page looks
awful,
since it's all wrapped on mobile. Here is an example what I'm
talking
about:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 01:13:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Maybe it can be replaced with one of the frames from:
http://eusebeia.dyndns.org/~hsteoh/tmp/mascot.png
:-)
Well I can see a pattern there: http://i.imgur.com/k0FpgIn.png
PS: I hope Walter don't mind! :)
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 02:33:24 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
PS: I hope Walter don't mind! :)
*Doesn't
Matheus.
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 18:04:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think http://dlang.org/overview.html is long in the tooth and
needs a rewrite or replacement. It's not appropriate for D at
this moment, e.g. questions like Why D? etc. don't need
answered anymore.
And please change
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 02:18:16 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I took the better part of today working on this:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/780.
See demo at http://erdani.com/d/.
What do you all think? Is it an improvement over what we have
now?
Nice
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 22:27:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Also, I am skeptical of a single style that will work for both
desktop
and mobile browsers. Isn't that what mobile stylesheets are
for? We can
have the same content, but we shouldn't break the desktop
layout or
Ok I'm afraid to ask this and sound like annoying person, but
according to my sign: their 'attention to detail' is for a
reason: to help others.
So:
Would be strange with get rid of : in this text:
This Week in D: ?
Because everytime that I look to it, this D: look like a sad
face. :]
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
Cool, thanks! I combined the two suggestions to
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:46:41 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter.
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 15:28:34 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Woke up, rebased, pushed. It's up folks, take a look!
http://dlang.org. -- Andrei
Neat! I think all the efforts you made till now is a improvement
from what the original site was.
I know It will be hard to please
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 13:28:22 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 03:29:23 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Can we have the old menus back :
Why would you want that?
Matheus.
On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 13:19:00 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
It is a lot easier to just run wine dmd and distribute the
finished exe than it is to copy all the development files to
the windows computer and run it there.
For what I'm seeing Wine isn't an emulator like VMWare, it's a
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 14:06:06 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
... I agree that the current site seems like an ugly ddoc hack,
I just recently tried to fix a broken link on the
frontpage(should be easy, right?) and was confused by ddoc so I
had to submit a bug request.
You know, I quit my job
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 15:52:24 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
... Ah, much more readable.
Maybe I misunderstood your question, but what you think about
this way:
while(1){
if(c = '0' c = '9')
{
/* number */
c = *s++;
... do something with c ...
}
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 14:00:57 UTC, aldanor wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 13:01:48 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 10:24:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
What do you think?
I'm seeing a lot a topics regards about fixing website, styles
an so on. Maybe is time
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 15:27:36 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
You know, I quit my job for my own wish, you know I want a
fresh air and do others things this year. I could try to help
with the site, but there is two main problems:
Sorry I'm not english, so I think the text above isn't quite
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 10:01:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-17 19:39, MattCoder wrote:
Indeed! But, if the body had a width setted this wouldn't
occur.
For example, adding width: 1024px on body in style.css it
will now be
fine to see on mobile.
No, that's not the correct
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 10:24:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What do you think?
I'm seeing a lot a topics regards about fixing website, styles an
so on. Maybe is time to try to raise money and hire someone with
good knowledge and of course freetime to work only on it?
Matheus.
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 22:54:16 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 16:03:24 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 15:52:24 UTC, Jens Bauer wrote:
...
First check: Is it a number; if so, get the entire number... If
not, try the second check: is it a
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 21:27:25 UTC, NVolcz wrote:
Googles pagespeed also gives some nice guidelines:
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=dlang.org
Nice and for image processing/compression I'd like to recommend
this free tool (Win/Linux/Mac):
There you go:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2su31i/the_redmonk_programming_language_rankings_january/
Unfortunately no D this time... YET!
Matheus.
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 20:45:09 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Unfortunately no D this time... YET!
I forgot to add: Compared with 2014 D grew:
2014 -
http://sogrady-media.redmonk.com/sogrady/files/2014/01/lang-rank-114-wm-e1390419878523.png
2015 -
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:03:52 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 17:00:55 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 16:58:39 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Thursday, 22 January 2015 at 05:27:04 UTC, Zekereth wrote:
First of all I like the new design. Way better than what's
here now. I'll just throw another site into the mix that I
like which is Ocaml's site: https://ocaml.org/ .
On Saturday, 24 January 2015 at 02:43:47 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Inspired by the recent developments, and Sebastiaan Koppe's
version [1] specifically, I gave it a go, too:
http://ag0aep6g-dlang.rhcloud.com/
Interesting, and just for fun I changed the CSS a bit:
http://i.imgur.com/ijLxXe2.png
On Friday, 23 January 2015 at 22:20:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It's kind of a misnomer, because it actually only considers
*consecutive
runs* of equivalent elements; it doesn't look at the whole
range before
deciding what goes in which group. So technically it should be
called
On Saturday, 24 January 2015 at 04:09:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Interesting, and just for fun I changed the CSS a bit:
http://i.imgur.com/ijLxXe2.png :)
The red band at the top is a bit odd.
Really?
Oh yeah it's. I just was trying to fill the top with something...
Bad luck! :)
On Wednesday, 28 January 2015 at 15:54:31 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Here's a variant with a grey background and the old logo,
suggested by veelo on GitHub:
http://ag0aep6g-dlang.rhcloud.com/variants/grey-oldlogo/
I like it too! :)
PS: One thing that I think which would be nice from this new
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 03:36:20 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Some links on github are only visible to admins/committers. Is
this available to all?
https://github.com/pulls?user=D-Programming-Language
Yes!
Matheus.
PS: I'm not posting this to see any flamewar between languages
there, but maybe some could enlighten the discussion with some
nice facts.
Matheus.
I saw this post:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2s0c3e/thoughts_on_replacement_languages/
And there this comment:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2s0c3e/thoughts_on_replacement_languages/cnkzzq7
Comparing Go and D, but some replies are getting a bit harsh
against
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 06:56:02 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
At this moment I only see some popularity comparisons
Yes in fact they are talking more about popularity between both
languages.
and I think they're generally correct...
Since I'm relative new here, I want know from you agree
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 15:44:42 UTC, thedeemon wrote:
...For example, compare these stats:
http://www.code2014.com/
http://code2013.herokuapp.com/
Interesting charts. But on the other hand, I remember that
sometime ago Andrei posted (
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 13:57:54 UTC, Kiith-Sa wrote:
That guy has been trolling every D thread in the last year.
I didn't know that. Glad you said!
Either way, D is definitely way more popular/active than it was
a year ago, especially with a large jump around last summer but
not
On Sunday, 11 January 2015 at 23:27:34 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Perhaps its better to have a number (average or mean) than no
number. Just ask 50 or 100 uers (or more) for their number of
downloads for the last 12 or 18 months. This is turn will give
you a guess-estimate as to the size of the
On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 21:13:10 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 21:02:54 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Monday, 12 January 2015 at 20:31:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Thanks, updated
The section under Uncertain has a huge font size now and
repeats what was just said.
On Wednesday, 7 January 2015 at 23:18:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
...
from http://dlang.org/phobos/std_array.html#.Appender one can
jump easily to its methods.
Thanks, Nick!
Well done! I just think that would be nice to have a link to go
back (Like a Up Arrow on the right corner for
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 20:05:03 UTC, mattcoder wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 17:23:15 UTC, welkam wrote:
Observation Nr. 1
People prefer to write var++ instead of ++var.
Believe or not I always used pre-increment. But yes, I see the
former in most of the codes out there.
On Wednesday, 11 March 2015 at 17:23:15 UTC, welkam wrote:
Observation Nr. 1
People prefer to write var++ instead of ++var.
Believe or not I always used pre-increment. But yes, I see the
former in most of the codes out there.
Matheus.
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
