On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 09:56:43 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
true?stt="AA":stt="BB";-///Out:BB
[...]
Assignment takes precendence over the ternary operator.
That's not true. Not in D and not in C/C++
https://wiki.dlang.org/Operator_precedence
http://en.cppreferenc
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 10:25:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 09:07:48 UTC, sdvcn wrote:
true?stt="AA":stt="BB";-///Out:BB
It's an UB.
Not a bug.
Why UB? stt is only modified once.
On Friday, 6 April 2018 at 14:03:18 UTC, Abdulhaq wrote:
On Friday, 6 April 2018 at 13:10:07 UTC, jason wrote:
what is this?
It's a perl program that converts D code into APL
+1
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 14:43:53 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, April 07, 2018 14:29:15 kdevel via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 10:25:19 UTC, bauss wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 09:07:48 UTC, sdvcn wrote:
>> true?stt=&qu
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 16:52:00 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
[...]
The odd man out is C++ [1], assignment has higher precedence
because of right to left evaluation.
Your reference [1] is not even a witness to your claim. The
precedence table says that the "Ternary conditional" has the
*
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 19:44:35 UTC, Ali wrote:
so it seems
that since
b = (true ? stt="AA": stt )="BB";
and
b = true ? stt="AA": stt ="BB";
are equivalent
that
that the ternary operator return stt (after assigning it "AA")
then assign "BB" to it
Can the ternary conditional eve
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 07:22:19 UTC, Patrick Schluter wrote:
You may find an in-depth discussion of the C++ case in
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7499400/ternary-conditional-and-assignment-operator-precedence
My formulation was ambiguous, it is the same precedence as the
link says.
On Sunday, 8 April 2018 at 13:00:02 UTC, bauss wrote:
[...]
// a.d
module a;
class Foo
{
private:
bool _baz;
public:
void handleBar(T : Foo)(T[] foos)
{
foreach (child; foos)
{
child._baz =
On Monday, 16 October 2017 at 09:06:01 UTC, qznc wrote:
Dijkstra made a good argument for zero-based:
https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html
Donald Knuth on that proposal ;-)
Edsger Dijkstra's Retirement Banquet - Part 8 of 13
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gH
Today I received a notification *e-mail* after somebody has
replied to a post:
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/jiefcxwqbjzqnmtaz...@forum.dlang.org#post-sksbiiwnfsxocklwcfsd:40forum.dlang.org
I would greatly appreciate if the zone admin of dlang.org adds an
SPF record
also to forum.dlang.org.
Vladimir!
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 23:21:05 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 February 2018 at 21:57:59 UTC, kdevel wrote:
I would greatly appreciate if the zone admin of dlang.org adds
an SPF record
also to forum.dlang.org.
Hi,
SPF/DKIM/DMARC are good ideas in gener
On Friday, 23 February 2018 at 20:15:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Now that I got your attention:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18511
Your bug report is about slowdown in *compilation* time. I
wondered if the longer compilation time is due to the better
(faster) generated code
On Sunday, 25 February 2018 at 11:46:26 UTC, Denis F wrote:
But it is impossible to convert text :names or '?' into
Postgres's "$1": Postgres isn't knows fields names at start of
a query processing and you can't replace '?' to "$" by
simple 'replace' call - it will need full syntax parsing of
On Monday, 2 April 2012 at 22:20:13 UTC, bearophile wrote:
For DMD choosing one or the other is arbitrary. It's a defect
of the way the D module system is designed.
Ran into that problem with a Module S containing
module S;
import std.stdio;
struct S {
this (string s)
{
14 matches
Mail list logo
