On 15.11.2017 15:07, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
In general, alias aliases symbols, whereas a lambda isn't a symbol. ...
There is essentially no merit to the symbol/no symbol distinction. It's
just a DMD implementation detail resulting in weird inconsistencies
between alias declarations and
On 15.11.2017 13:28, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
However, it would be good to prevent the second alias which effectively
does nothing.
No. It should just overload properly.
On Thursday, 16 November 2017 at 16:10:50 UTC, Meta wrote:
int function(int) f1 = (int n) => n;
int function(int) f2 = (char c) => c;
Should be int function(char)
On Thursday, 16 November 2017 at 13:05:51 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 19:29:29 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/15/17 11:59 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 15:25:06 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
alias foo =
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 19:29:29 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/15/17 11:59 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 15:25:06 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
alias foo = lambda1;
alias foo = lambda2;
What?
Yep. Would never have tried that in a million
On 11/15/17 11:59 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 15:25:06 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
alias foo = lambda1;
alias foo = lambda2;
What?
Yep. Would never have tried that in a million years before seeing this
thread :) But it does work. Tested with dmd 2.076.1
On Wednesday, 15 November 2017 at 15:25:06 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
alias foo = lambda1;
alias foo = lambda2;
What?
On 11/15/17 9:07 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 07:28:02 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 11/14/17 8:56 PM, Michael V. Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 23:41:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
In fact, I'm surprised you can alias
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 07:28:02 Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 11/14/17 8:56 PM, Michael V. Franklin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 23:41:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> >> In fact, I'm surprised you can alias to an expression like that.
> >>
On 11/14/17 8:56 PM, Michael V. Franklin wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 23:41:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
In fact, I'm surprised you can alias to an expression like that.
Usually you need a symbol. It's probably due to how this is lowered.
Boy did I "step in it" with my
10 matches
Mail list logo
