Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 02:12:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/2/2018 10:07 AM, carblue wrote: I generally already used -dip1000 since DConf2017 and it served me well, until about 2 month ago, "by accident" code was committed to std.uni that broke my builds, see issue #17961. I invested

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread Radu via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 09:04:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/2/2018 10:48 PM, Manu wrote: I've been arguing for DIP1000 (or something very much like it) for almost 10 years. It's one of the small handful of issues that lead me to the forum in the first place. 'Patience' might not be

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread Radu via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:07:34 UTC, carblue wrote: On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:36:10 UTC, Radu wrote: [...] The fact that it takes 8 days for any reply, doesn't that say something? @safe is a high ranked technical issue in vision papers (in german we say something like "paper

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread ixid via Digitalmars-d
On Saturday, 3 March 2018 at 09:04:04 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: On 3/2/2018 10:48 PM, Manu wrote: I've been arguing for DIP1000 (or something very much like it) for almost 10 years. It's one of the small handful of issues that lead me to the forum in the first place. 'Patience' might not be

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-03 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
On 3/2/2018 10:48 PM, Manu wrote: I've been arguing for DIP1000 (or something very much like it) for almost 10 years. It's one of the small handful of issues that lead me to the forum in the first place. 'Patience' might not be the right word at this point ;) It is nice to see some interest in

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread Manu via Digitalmars-d
On 2 March 2018 at 10:07, carblue via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:36:10 UTC, Radu wrote: >> >> Whould like to know what's the state of dip1000? > > > The fact that it takes 8 days for any reply, doesn't that say something? > @safe is a

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
On 3/2/2018 10:07 AM, carblue wrote: I generally already used -dip1000 since DConf2017 and it served me well, until about 2 month ago, "by accident" code was committed to std.uni that broke my builds, see issue #17961. I invested a lot of time to fix this by PR 6041. The current state is: I

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:17:02 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:07:34 UTC, carblue wrote: (It may be absolutely unrelated, but there once was a very productive and knowledgeable compiler et. al. contributor, 9rnsr, Hara Kenji; though not contributing to dmd

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
On Friday, 2 March 2018 at 18:07:34 UTC, carblue wrote: (It may be absolutely unrelated, but there once was a very productive and knowledgeable compiler et. al. contributor, 9rnsr, Hara Kenji; though not contributing to dmd since ~ 1.5 years any more, he's still ranked #1 in number of

Re: dip1000 state

2018-03-02 Thread carblue via Digitalmars-d
On Thursday, 22 February 2018 at 14:36:10 UTC, Radu wrote: Whould like to know what's the state of dip1000? The fact that it takes 8 days for any reply, doesn't that say something? @safe is a high ranked technical issue in vision papers (in german we say something like "paper is patient"),