of a sudden, when i click on any of the buttons, i see no text show up
in the
window. i seem to be transmitting and got some email feedback for my last
transmissions, but nothing shows the text going out.
wierd...opened the Fuentes folder, and see the Teletype TTF font file.
when i open it, it
Of course.
Not being a sound card guy when it comes to RTTY.
John, W0JAB
At 04:56 PM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
I use USB dfor FSK, simply because I want the low side of the signals to show
up on the left side of the waterfall, and the high frequencies to show up to
the right. Because that
My experiments (many receptions and 2 transmissions) today with
ROS 1 and ROS 16 shows that it is quite an effective mode.
Congratulations Jose. Of particular interest to me were the several
occasions where I decoded a signal that was not visible in the
waterfall or audible to my ears. It
IMO, ROS is not *true* SS in the legal sense. Other posts I've read cite an
FCC reference that SS involves spreading the signal EVENLY over the
bandwidth. ROS is using 16 DISCRETE tones to modulate, with a lot more
empty space than actual signal. I'm curious how much of spread spectrum's
still having problems, still no text showing up in rx or tx.
where is the station info stored ? i deleted all the program, and still when i
reinstall, the info comes backmaybe i need to delete that whereever it is
to get the text bug out.
david/wd4kpd
pse email me personal if you got the
interesting problems with new ROS, but is to be expected
since i lost the text displays in the program, i did system restore and got the
problem solved. however the personal info is still stored somewhere i dont
know. it did not show the station info however this time.
is fun.
david/wd4kpd
KH6TY wrote:
Jose,
We want to be able to use the mode on HF, but it is not our decision,
but our FCC's decision, for whatever reasons they currently think are
valid. Fortunately, it may work well on VHF and HF, so I plan to find out.
I hate to say this, as I'm sure I'll be called all
Dave wrote:
Jose (and all),
My two-cents worth:
Olivia is MFSK (or AMFSK), ROS is Spread Spectrum. MFSK is legal on HF, SS
is not.
It isn't about bandwidth or any of the other arguments. Since ROS is Spread
Spectrum then it is not allowed on HF in areas regulated by the FCC
LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION as they used to say.
There in Europe, you have dozens of local governments to satisify, in the way
of modes and power, bands, etc. Im always supprised to find two governments
over there, who agree with anything another two may want to do on the bands.
Over the
the program author mentioned that when he tested on 40m, that he used LSB.
this is not really a problem, but i think the digital community has pretty much
setteled on USB for all sound card digital modes. even some of the AFSK/RTTY
people use USB.
before too long, got to get it setteled in.
At 06:58 PM 2/19/2010, you wrote:
even some of the AFSK/RTTY people use USB.
I have seen this too and at times wonder why.
I think maybe because the other modes are USB.
I got into RTTY in 1976. Still use a machine for RTTY.
The answer is in Wikipedia for Spread Spectrum.
73 - Skip KH6TY
Marco IK1ODO wrote:
jose alberto nieto ros wrote:
Â
We can see it as we want, but if OLIVIA is legal, ROS is legal.
The only difference I see, Olivia does not say to
be spread spectrum, ROS does so :-) - but it's
exactly
Has anyone had any luck running ROS with Vista?
Tony -K2MO
It will interesting to see if Tony K2MO gets a chance to put this through the
Pathsim tests and compare it to Olivia. My guess is
that it will be close to that of Olivia. Andy K3UK
Andy,
I'd be more than happy to run ROS through the path simulator if I could get the
program running with
Dave Ackrill wrote:
but if we could get rid of many of the very loud European
stations, as well as the US ones,
So the plan would be to get rid of the loud European US stations, and
just leave the ( presumably not-loud?) UK ones on the air? :-)
Sounds workable to me, we could all dig out
The FCC is not our friend, unless you are a well-to-do multimillion-dollar
corporate conglomerate. [ROS, legal in USA] I
remember as a young tyke, frequently praying for a new bycycle. Eventually
realizing this was not to be, I stole a bike,
continued praying, only now asking for forgiveness.
ROS is illegal.
For everyone.
Along with thinking outside of the box.
Please place yourselves under house arrest.
You are hereby FINED.
Mail your checks to KA1GMN.
philw
Is ROS actually a spread spectrum frequency hopping mode or more like CHIP?
I have not seen any published modulation scheme/protocol specificaions so
guessing.
I certainly doubt the -35dB claim without even anecdotal evidence...otherwise
for EME I now have a 10dB path margin :)
73,
Bill
All,
The latest version of ROS seems to work fine with Vista.
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
Thanks Jose...
Tony -K2MO
No, I get a run time error 50003.
Bob C WU9Q
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 7:50 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Vista Run-time error and ROS
Has anyone had any luck running ROS with Vista?
Tony -K2MO
Yo only have to download the sound archive: The Man Of the Vara at 1 bauds
(-35 dBs) and tester.
The results speak for themselves
De: n9dsj n9...@comcast.net
Para: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Enviado: sáb,20 febrero, 2010 03:53
Asunto: [digitalradio] Re: ROS,
I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA 32/1000.
But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know ROS is
two times faster than OLIVIA 32/1000.
You should compare ROS 16 with OLIVIA 8/1000. Then the different is about 5-6
dBs for the same
Very impressive Jose, again...congratulations.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:25 AM, jose alberto nieto ros
nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
I made the experiment over AWGN and ROS is 2 dBs better than OLIVIA
32/1000.
But we are comparing two modes at differents character rate. As you know
ROS is
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
