> Hi all, I am monitoring 14.093 Try to connect and leave a message if I am not
> with my radio.
> 73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Hello Dear Steinar,
I sent you several mail messages this afternoon running Multipsk ALE400. All
went through just fine even with QSB / QRM - no repeats - 100 word Pangram to
John,
OK John - hope to see you there - thanks.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: "John Bradley"
To:
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:49 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ALE400 testing
> moved up and just before I left saw u on 14106.
>
>
>
> Will st
, September 28, 2009 6:24 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400 testing
John,
> VE5MU on 14078.0 running ALE400. Please try a connect
Easy connect / mail transfer John - left you a message. Are you available
this evening for a 20 meter ALE400 c
John,
> VE5MU on 14078.0 running ALE400. Please try a connect
Easy connect / mail transfer John - left you a message. Are you available this
evening for a 20 meter ALE400 chat?
Tony -K2MO
ROFLMAO ! good one!! amazing what a typo can do
73's
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of mikea
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 1:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400 testing
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:04:01PM -0600, John Bradley wrote:
> using the selective call function under Auxillary Functions, enter my call
> (VE5MU) on your station list, and sue selective call to connect.
Wow! I hadn't realized that Canada was so litigious.
Thanks, John. I learned something abo
possibly Andy has info up as well
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Stan Grigaliunas
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:34 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400 testing
Hi,
I am on
QSY to 14074 @ 2300utc
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:51 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: John Bradley
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
John,
See you on 14074.0 for
John,
See you on 14074.0 for quick test?
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: "John Bradley"
To: ;
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 6:48 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE400
> testing latest version (19 Sept) on 7082USB both VE5MU and VE5EOC
>
>
>
> John
>
> VE5MU
>
>
Hi all,
I am calling cq in ale400 arq mode on 14.074 now.
Try to connect to me:)
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Matt,
> Iam intrested in playing with ale 400 using multipsk and was wondering
> what are the
> calling freq? Matt kc2pua
There are a handful of stations currently active on 14074.0 USB. The
bandwidth is approximately 400Hz. Let us know if you need any tips on
working ALE-400.
Tony -K2MO
up/DXandTalk
> dxandt...@yahoogroups.com
>
> Moderator
> Digital_modes
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Andrew O'Brien
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, Septemb
o, or LOTW preferred,
> I Do not use, but as a courtesy do upload to eQSL for
> those who do.
>
> Moderator
> DXandTALK
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
> dxandt...@yahoogroups.com
>
> Moderator
> Digital_modes
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?ygu
/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400 N7DC
Danny, I think they are not being posted/spotted. I have always
assum
do.
>
> Moderator
> DXandTALK
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
> dxandt...@yahoogroups.com
>
> Moderator
> Digital_modes
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Tony
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups
alk
dxandt...@yahoogroups.com
Moderator
Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400 N7DC
Danny,
>
Danny,
> What I dont understand, with all the reported contacts here on this group,
> why I am not seeing > ANY of them on the spot network? I would gladly give
> some of them a listen, if they showed up
> Danny Douglas N7DC
That's a good question...
I've noticed 'exotic mode' cluster spots
ALE-400 contacts and not the number of times overall.
>>
>> Understand if you'd rather not discuss it further. Hope you're able to
>> get
>> it working; let us know what you find.
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> F
F digi for JUST a few days ...Got my ticket from that
>> "Cracker Jack Box"
>> Its me, its not really happining..
>>
>> I mean.. the hundreds of other users surely would have found this
>> problemRight??
>>
>> Just let it go...I have.
>
John (VE5MU)
> great conditions, 3 of us on now and looking for more at 0200Z
Nice to meet Terry (VE5TLW) on ALE-400. Thank you both for the nice contacts
and good luck with VE5EOC.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: "John Bradley"
To: ;
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:05 PM
erall.
Understand if you'd rather not discuss it further. Hope you're able to get it
working; let us know what you find.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
> ***"If I'm not mis
EVERmy bad
- Original Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
What I dont understand, with all the reported contacts here on this group,
why I am not seeing ANY of them
01 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
What I dont understand, with all the reported contacts here on this group,
why I am not seeing ANY of them on the spot network? I would gladly give some
of them a listen, if they showed up there, but they are not. I have only
recently downl
- Original Message -
From: kt4w...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
***"If I'm not mistaken, you referred to the sync issue as a major problem
that happens 40-to-50 times during a QSO wit
: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
Trip,
> Its not a unique problem. KT4WO
Well it does seem to be unique problem because we haven't heard from anyone
else with major sync issues (yet). Your comments will hope
;>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
>> To:
>> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>>
>>
>>> w4pgh
>>> k3gau
&
John,
Yes, in the big majority of QSOs, it is rare to find a long period of deep QSB.
However...
But to leave a message to an ARQ FAE beacon
(connection->transmission->disconnection), this problem does not appear, except
if the message carries a relatively big file, which will take much time t
e -
> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 4:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>
>
>> w4pgh
>> k3gau
>> n4wi
>> wa9hcz
>> ni9y
>> n9fdf
>> k9vu
>> wb8rol
>> ai4cm
>>
>
could it be that W4PGH has a VOX delay on
>> or some other issue? Have you worked anyone else on ALE-400?
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
>> To:
>> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009
>>
>> Just a thought here...
>>
>> Your station setup sounds ok, but could it be that W4PGH has a VOX delay
>> on
>> or some other issue? Have you worked anyone else on ALE-400?
>>
>> Tony -K2MO
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>&
thought here...
>
> Your station setup sounds ok, but could it be that W4PGH has a VOX delay on
> or some other issue? Have you worked anyone else on ALE-400?
>
> Tony -K2MO
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
> To:
> Sent: Sunda
rom: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
>I have also used ALE/FAE400 since it was developed ... and no VOX
> 2.4 pent 4 with gig of ram...or 1 gig pent3 with 512 ram or 800mhz
> pent 3 with 512 or 1.5 gig ATOM
portion of the
incoming signal causing repeats and sync issues.
What kind of rig / interface are you using?
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Carswell Jr."
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
> Trust me pal... b
I have also used ALE/FAE400 since it was developed ... and no VOX
2.4 pent 4 with gig of ram...or 1 gig pent3 with 512 ram or 800mhz
pent 3 with 512 or 1.5 gig ATOM w/1gig ram.4 diff. homebrew
interfaces some with xformers..some notIcom IC-718 or Kenwood
TS-50 or Kenwood TS450SAT or Ken
Trip,
You're not by any chance using a VOX interface (like the Signalink) with
the delay button pressed in are you? That would really screw up the
timing of FAE400.
I haven't experienced the collision problem other than when sigs are
really buried in noise.
I have also used FAE400 since it wa
Trust me pal... been using ALE400 from the start...the outa-sync issue
is not just a
one time thing... and not just on QRP.
Im a big fan of ALE400 and MultiPSK(reg)...BUT It IS a major issue.
When you have had it occur 40-50 times(with 20 over sig.)
..then tell me its not major.
I have had 100+
I am probably too close to John on 20 meters as I never have any luck
connecting. I am calling CQ and monitoring 14.074 with FAE400 right now
(2115Z) and will try and have it on for a few hours when I am not
experimenting with PSKmail_server.
73,
Rick, KV9U
John Bradley wrote:
>
>
> now that
Alan Barrow wrote:
> Yes, I understand "it works". FBB works OK on HF because once you are
> logged in, it's not that interactive. But you still have 2-3 turnarounds
> before you send the initial message, etc.
FBB protocol has a feature I find very valuable: the Z-modem style
resume. JNOS had no
You are right in that the likely solution would be SCS and Pactor3.
The only other thing that we have tried is RFSM8000, developed by Dimitri ,
which has a email gateway built into it, is ARQ and runs on soundcard
Nobody in the US is using this on the ham bands at least since it does not
co
Jose A. Amador wrote:
> Based on what I know, for SMTP, JNOS may be an option at less than 300
> baud, i.e., 100-110 baud or PAX, using MultiPSK as "soundcard modem".
>
> I have not tested any of it yet. I have had no time and possibilities to
> test it so far.
>
> JNOS can use FBB compression or
John Bradley wrote:
> "ARES has responded with a command unit which has HF data capability. This
> could include a WIFI router so that laptops could be included from the local
> EOC. This command unit would work back into an EOC with data and internet
> connections. ARES would be tasked with passin
Based on what I know, for SMTP, JNOS may be an option at less than 300
baud, i.e., 100-110 baud or PAX, using MultiPSK as "soundcard modem".
I have not tested any of it yet. I have had no time and possibilities to
test it so far.
JNOS can use FBB compression or LZW compressed SMTP on any of it
Jose A. Amador wrote:
> I almost always used JNOS with KISS interfaces, it is a natural way of
> using it. TNC's under MSDOS, and also thru pipes under Linux with
> net2kiss (I would have to go back to the manual to remember a few
> details). It could be interfaced with the BPQ switch, so FBB, J
When I used to be on another digital group (I think it may have been one
of the TAPR lists?), Maiko was able to get certain hardware/firmware to
work with his development of JNOS2.
Although JNOS is very theoretical to me, I wonder if it could it be set
up with the mode of your choice (within li
I almost always used JNOS with KISS interfaces, it is a natural way of
using it. TNC's under MSDOS, and also thru pipes under Linux with
net2kiss (I would have to go back to the manual to remember a few
details). It could be interfaced with the BPQ switch, so FBB, JNOS, the
BPQ switch could sh
So how would we go about using FBB or JNOS? JNOS has appeal since it can
gateway to the internet, a desirable feature
for emergency comms
John
VE5MU
I believe that the simplest is not reinventing the wheel, and using MultiPSK
as a modem, using traditional BBS programs as the mail application.
Do
I believe that the simplest is not reinventing the wheel, and using
MultiPSK as a modem, using traditional BBS programs as the mail
application.
Does anyone find this to be wrong?
The store and forward part could mean a *LOT* of work to be done, or
actually, re-done...
For traditional ham mai
technically we were using FAE400 mode and FAE2000 modes, in ARQ as opposed
to general broadcast (unproto) mode.
I agree with you on the 400ARQ mode, and the feature I appreciate most is
the ability to send mail to an unattended station, having determined that
the unattended station can hear
Hi John,
At the time I was listening to the frequency there were RTTY stations on
either side and very close, so did not attempt a connection.
Were you using ALE400 or FAE400? My understanding is that FAE is faster
than the ALE with plain text due to compression which I don't think is
availabl
John Bradley wrote:
>
>
>
> · Have given up on the PCALE and HFlink bunch, since there
> seems to be no interest in doing anything other than sending 1 line
> messages to each other , or simply sounding. The MARS version of PCALE
> might work, but the author is not allowing use of this so
I tried to connect again today (this afternoon) as I saw your request
for connecting via FAE400 on 14.111 and 7.103. I tried both stations
callsigns as it almost seemed as if the frequencies were reversed from
the other day with the regular MIL-STD-188-141A mode, but maybe I
misread that, HI. I
Hello to all,
To leave a mail to John, start the "Aux. fonctions" window and add "VE5MU" to
your callsign list:
- Write "VE5MU" in the edit label where it is written "Call"
- click on the button"Add this call to the list"
- click on the button "Lits up-to-date"
Select VE5MU in the addressee lis
OK John, well as I said I dumped MultiPSK but may get it back as nothing but
problems with MixW and it should serve as a good backup program anyway even if
it does look like a dogs breakfast LOL.
Cheers
- Original Message -
From: John Bradley
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; [E
Hi John,
I don't personally have any need for soundings as I mostly prefer to
call CQ and see if I can communicate with someone. But as we increase
the number of modes and sub modes, the chance of actually finding
someone with the same protocol is greatly diminished, even if you have
the same
p://
>hflink.com/ale400/" which is a specific page for ALE400, with a lot of
>information.
>
>73
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Hisami Dejima
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 6:38 AM
>
ima
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE400
Hi Patrik
I found ALE400 by RSID, but QSO was not completed.
Can I find the MultiPSK ALE tutorial in the Internet?
73, Hisami 7L4IOU
>Hello John,
>
>>
Hi Patrik
I found ALE400 by RSID, but QSO was not completed.
Can I find the MultiPSK ALE tutorial in the Internet?
73, Hisami 7L4IOU
>Hello John,
>
>>Where on the bands can this mode be found?
>For this first question look at the mail hereafter, sent in the Multipsk
>group.
>
>>And does it so
At 03:47 PM 12/12/2007, you wrote:
>Pactor 1 and Amtor are FSK modes (two frequencies). ALE and ALE400 are MFSK
>modes (as MFSK16 for example).
Thanks Patrick.
I knew that but was asking if it sounds like Pactor or Amtor ARQ.
The fast on off.
I have no clue what "RS ID detection" is .
Hello John,
>Where on the bands can this mode be found?
For this first question look at the mail hereafter, sent in the Multipsk group.
>And does it sound like Pactor / Amtor ARQ ?
Pactor 1 and Amtor are FSK modes (two frequencies). ALE and ALE400 are MFSK
modes (as MFSK16 for example).
So ALE4
Hi John,
We don't have any specific places we have been operating, although I
made a suggestion on the HFDEC yahoogroup (Hams for Disaster and
Emergency Communications), that perhaps we could operate up a ways from
the typical PSK31 watering holes. My suggestion, and it is only a
suggestion, i
Hello John,
TKS for the report of this long QSO.
>Under poor conditions it is important to avoid collisions by typing and ending
>with an "over" sign, be it BT,K or
In the last test version, I have integered a Sholto Fisher idea to limit
collisions, which is the following:
If A receives a f
I agree it is a very useful development. I am just wondering, since many
standard ALE frequencies end with a ".5", what about using for example
14109.0 ?
On 10/30/07, John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>First impressions are that Patrick has a very nice bit of software in
> the new AL
62 matches
Mail list logo
