RE: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-12 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 7:46 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes --- DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose, Are there really more multi-path signals on 40M and 80M than 20M? I've

RE: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-12 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
: Friday, September 08, 2006 9:14 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes Very important information, Rein, and thank you for sharing it with the group. This is the kind of real world information we need to hear. Considering the enormous amount

RE: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-12 Thread Jose Amador
--- DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose, I re-though the question and if 20M is near the MUF, then there would likely be more multi-path signals on 40 and 80. But I suppose that you need to define what near the MUF is in terms for frequency or percent.

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-08 Thread Rein Couperus
. Moreover the biggest channel killer is the Pactor 2/3 QRM, not QRN or noise. 73, Rein PA0R -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Gesendet: 08.09.06 03:53:18 An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Betreff: Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes Hola Jose, I

RE: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-08 Thread Jose Amador
--- DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jose, Are there really more multi-path signals on 40M and 80M than 20M? I've never looked at signals on 80/40/20 from that aspect. 73, Walt/K5YFW Well, maybe I am blaming the butler, as in mistery novels, and it is not

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Miller
My measurements on 10 Mhz show that MT63 has 20% less errors than PSK63 on the same channel. The is not enough to offset the negative points. Very interesting. It would seem that MT63 would better remain a broadcast mode like Amtor Mode B or PACTOR FEC. 73, Mark N5RFX Need a Digital

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-08 Thread Jose Amador
--- KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola Jose, I think that Paul, K9PS attempted to do this at one time, but was not able to finish it. He has developed ARQ criteria that was the used to help develop PSKmail. I thought that MT-63 could handle multi-path quite well, but I still prefer

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-08 Thread Rein Couperus
Very important information, Rein, and thank you for sharing it with the group. This is the kind of real world information we need to hear. Considering the enormous amount of bandwidth MT-63 takes up, it would have to work several times faster and better than a narrow band mode to

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-07 Thread Jose Amador
--- Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Rick, TKS for info. Perhaps, next year I will see if it is possible to carry a synchronous ARQ mode (perhaps Pactor 1 forced to 100 bauds) in Multipsk, under a big PC XP. 73 Patrick I know that somebody I cannot remember is

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-06 Thread Patrick Lindecker
, September 06, 2006 5:24 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes The most current SCAMP Specification file was Revision Q, dated Feb 1, 2005. It is on the ScampProtocol yahoogroup. That group has been very quiet for well over a year as we are waiting for Rick, KN6KB

Re: [digitalradio] ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-05 Thread Patrick Lindecker
Hello Rick, RR for all! Pax2 has a speed of 117 wpm for a useful speed of about 50 to 60 wpm in average after the protocol management... The timing of Windows/Linux is not so bad that you could not have a moderate sized window. Under Linux and DOS, I think a synchronous ARQ mode is possible,