Who is OLIVIA?
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa.
Real Radios Glow In The Dark
- Original Message -
From: A repeater.kee...@yahoo.co.uk
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:49 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia Contacts on 40m ? ! ?
Hi All,
Does anyone
Pawel Jalocha's daughter.
Simon Brown
http://sdr-radio.com
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rotten Robbie
Who is OLIVIA?
Simon HB9DRV wrote:
Pawel Jalocha's daughter.
Simon Brown
http://sdr-radio.com
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rotten Robbie
Who is OLIVIA?
And it's the middle name of my grand-daughter. Her Mum must
Dave,
There is some Olivia activity on 7.043.250, but is sparse. Most of the
acitivity I copy is Cuban and US stations.
73
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:49 AM, A repeater.kee...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
Does anyone actually use 7.043.250 ?
All the data I can find
Tom,
I use the following macro/text for a special report during an Olivia
QSO. It is:
S/N Ratio: GET SN
Freq Offset: GET OFFSET
Sample Rate: GET RATE
73 de
Ron W4LDE
Thomas F. Giella NZ4O wrote:
Recently I bought a new computer and in moving all of my software to it I
seem to have
, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone /
Bandwidth Configuration
Very interesting.
What simulator are you using?
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
It's interesting to see how
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
As a thumb rule:
For a same sub mode: Contestia has a double speed (+3 dB) but only 1.5
dB of loss in term of minimum S/N compared to Olivia. So it seems to be
a better compromise.
Assuming that the S/N is constant. In practice the
S/N seems to vary wildly from
Contestia and RTTYM are variants of the character set used with Olivia.
Olivia is 8-bit, Contestia is 7-bit and (I think) RTTYM is 5-bit or 6-bit.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com
Assuming that the S/N is constant.
(with a double set of
characters as in RTTY, so with the same problem of non-desired set of
characters switching).
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Rik van Riel r...@surriel.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone / Bandwidth
Configuration
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
As a thumb rule:
For a same sub mode: Contestia has a double speed (+3 dB) but only 1.5
dB of loss in term of minimum S/N
Exactly what I would have expected, nice to see that you get these results.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony
Hope you all find it interesting...
Tony -K2MO
Very interesting.
What simulator are you using?
philw de ka1gmn
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
It's interesting to see how the different Olivia
mode configurations compare when put through the HF path simulator.
I ran Contestia through the
things evenly matched.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Phil Williams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [digitalradio] Olivia - Contestia Tone /
Bandwidth Configuration
Very interesting.
What simulator
i like the ida of automatic changing of the modes . would act as pactor 123
.
start with a slow mode ... call cq. make your qso in high speed if
possible switch to slow again for the next cq .
dg9bfc
sigi
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To:
Would not WINMOR be an option here?
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original Message -
From: Tony
It would be a neat to see some kind of throughput sensing where the speed
of the mode changed to suit conditions automatically.
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward a given Olivia
speed/bandwidth:
- need a standard to find others on the air. It is easy to determine
the BW, but not so easy for the number of tones.
- if you use a non-standard speed to start with, you will have a
difficult time
: [digitalradio] Olivia
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward a given Olivia
speed/bandwidth:
- need a standard to find others on the air. It is easy to determine
the BW, but not so easy for the number of tones.
- if you use a non-standard speed to start with, you
- Original Message -
From: Rick W mrf...@frontiernet. net mailto:mrf...@frontiernet.net
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
I think that the reasons that we tend to gravitate toward
Rick
I feel you think that winmor was intended to be a chat mode.
It was not and is not nor a replacement for pactor.
John
Hi John,
WINMOR is an open protocol, therefore it is up to the developers as to
what they want to use it for. I personally prefer open protocols because
of this, but far be it for me to tell others how they can or can not use
a given protocol.
The current developers have designed the protocol
Good idea
Maybe a sprint type activity for 12 hours on 40/20 would work. The
propagation gods have not been kind though
john
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 1:20 PM
To:
Hello Graham,
At the moment, in Paris, I hear a very weak (-25 dB) QRSS signal at 502 KHz
USB AF at 1250 Hz. It is repeated: G4WGTM (without be 100 % sure).
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Graham g0...@hotmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009
Hi Graham
Here is a screen capture from Norway .
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON
- RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS
Hi Graham
Here is a screen capture from Norway
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 Time: 18:23:45
1700 UTC 14 Dec 2008 will be the activity hour for Olivia 500/16 on
or around 14077 USB (DIAL) . Digitalradio members are encouraged to
tune in a join QSOs. Spread out at least 500 Hz if multiple QSOs are
in progress..
list times available I try to be listening which mode 16/500 or ???
I have mixw and Dm780
Loyd C.Headrick K4LCH
K4LCH
Vol State Hosting
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DIGITALRADIO digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 18,
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
list times available I try to be listening which mode 16/500 or ???
I have mixw and Dm780
Loyd C.Headrick K4LCH
K4LCH
Vol State Hosting
Olivia mode comparisons, testers needed.
I am
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due to the unstable
conditions at the time (selective fading / multi-path).
Switching to Olivia 500/16 fixed the problem. Copy went from marginal
If I am allowed to summarize, if you don't own a PTC, at least give
Olivia a try 8-)
Impressive indeed, Tony.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
---
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due to
Of Kevin O'Rorke
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 9:13 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia mode performance
Tony wrote:
All,
Certainly is remarkable the way Olivia mode performs under adverse
conditions.
Was having trouble decoding VK2PN in PSK31 mode due
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:59 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
John,
I am not sure which software implements the 2 tone variety other than
the Olivia Aid
Ham Radio Deluxe/Digital Master 780 would have the 250/2 as well as many
other mode as well as even 125/2. I measured the throughput of 250/2
and it appears too slow for practical use at around only 10 wpm. Not
competitive with 45 baud RTTY at 60 wpm. I am sure it would be quite
robust
John,
I am not sure which software implements the 2 tone variety other than
the Olivia Aid program?
It occurred to me after posting this that maybe the 2 tone variety of
RTTYM might be the best candidate as a comparison with RTTY.
The RTTYM mode uses a similar 5 bit character set so would be
I am not sure which software implements the 2 tone variety other than
the Olivia Aid program?
MixW...
Tony K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Sholto Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
Good idea, Sholto;
so, do you want to try this somewhere? 30m has been good for us in the past
John
VE5MU
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sholto Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 10:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
It should be better, because of the Walsh code layer.
I have used it for tests among other Olivia modes, but never compared
RTTY and 2/250 Olivia. It worked fairly well, but it was just for
curiosity sake, more than anything else. It was not a serious, well
planned, exhaustive test.
73,
Ciao Claudio,
Funziono molto spesso Olivia e qui sono i modi
che normali di funzionamento ho trovato per le frequenze
differenti:
Fra 14072 e 14078 (USB), ho regolato solitamente la manopola 1407x.65
(14072.65, 14073.65, ecc), il programma di Olivia a 500/16 e la frequenza
concenta audio
Ok, gracias por tu respuesta. Intentaremos llamar CQ alrededor de las 1900 z
en 14073.65.
Ok, thanks for your answer. I will try to call CQ about 1900 z in 14073.65usb
Claudio-LU2VCD
El día 27/09/07, G. McFarlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola Claudio,
¡Me disculpo por la respuesta
Hola Claudio,
¡Me disculpo por la respuesta Italiana!
Funciono Olivia muy a menudo y aquí soy los modos de
funcionamiento normales que he encontrado para diversas
frecuencias:
Entre 14072 y 14078 (USB), fijé generalmente el dial a 1407x.65
(14072.65, 14073.65, al etc), el programa de Olivia
Try Fldigi, really free. No hidden MS tax.
Rein PA0R
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Gesendet: 05.06.07 13:06:52
An: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Betreff: [digitalradio] Olivia Software
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA
José,
Fldigi supports Olivia for Linux. If you are not a Linux user you can
also use the Puppy live CD without affecting your HD.
Darrel
On 4-Jun-07, at 6:34 PM, KP4VP wrote:
Does anyone have idea how to get a free OLIVIA software? Any URL is
appreciated.
Sincerely,
José - KP4VP
Yes, good point. Also Multipsk has about 80% of functions and 100% of major
functions in a free version that does NOT expire. I think MixW expires in
30 days.
On 6/5/07, Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
José,
Fldigi http://www.w1hkj.com/Fldigi.html supports Olivia for Linux. If
you
The program Multipsk is free and has Olivia in it plus a lot of other digital
modes u can look at it and judge for yourself de kc0hln
-- Original Message: -
From:KP4VP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Hey Patricia,
I'm over in Texas. Will give it a try if you are still on.
Phil De KA1GMN
Patricia (Elaine) Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm operating Olivia mode on 30 meters at the moment (0308GMT) ...
If anyone cares to make a QSO, I'd like to run
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Phil Williams
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 8:53 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia on 10140.5 -- Sunday Evening April 8th:
Hey Patricia,
I'm over in Texas. Will give it a try if you
I like to use the narrowest possible bandwidth mode possible, but
sometimes conditions are so bad, and there are unlikely to be many other
stations that going to a wide bandwidth 1000 or even 2000 Hz mode I
think it can be justified.
So far, the consensus seems to be that Olivia will beat all
1000/32 would blow all the QRN away, methinks
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 11:04 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] OLIVIA Re: Best mode for severe QRN?
Rick KV9U wrote:
Well, tonight
After several years, the main digital mode still appears to be PSK31,
especially on the higher bands. When a new mode comes out, some of us
will test it and if it doesn't have some superior feature, may not use
it that much. A good example is MT-63 which seemed fairly popular when
it first
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I received a Skype call from a ham asking me the very same question I
was thinking last week...what has happened to Olivia? Last year I
would say it was behind only PSK31, Pactor and RTTY in terms of
frequent actvity for digital modes. Now I think it is not as
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying size sent in MFSK data. The offset needs to be set for the
different Olivia widths, but that is about it. Am I confused?
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 24
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying size sent in MFSK data. The offset needs to be set for the
different Olivia widths
Well, I plain have not attempted it.
In spite of my ignorance, it might work.
Will look into it later.
Jose, CO2JA
Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images with a header
specifying
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Is there any reason we couldn't have images with Olivia? As far as I
can tell, MFSK images are just plain old SSTV images
compressed digital SSTV.
73
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia dying?
Patrick,
My understanding is that the modulation for the image
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I received a Skype call from a ham asking me the very same question I
was thinking last week...what has happened to Olivia? Last year I
would say it was behind only PSK31, Pactor and RTTY in terms of
frequent actvity for digital modes. Now I think it is not as
We have lots of comparisons of modes, but we don't but them side by side...how
about a comparison list like this...
mode -|- thruhput in WPM -|- %error free -|- robustness (%error free at what
SNR) -|- Bandwidth
You might have to qualify this by using certain power levels and receiver
Would you please drop the first amendment rhetoric? It's totally
irrelevent here.
Thanks,
Paul / K9PS
Thomas Giella KN4LF wrote:
There is a second Olivia Yahoo eGroup at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/olivia_mfsk .There is no heavy handed
moderator control in this eGroup, as the 1st
I think we need to get away from the idea that different modes can not
coexist (within reason). Consider that many are promoting a change by
the FCC to base the occupancy by bandwidth, rather than mode. At the
very least, you would expect the digital ops to be able to do this.
Typically, I
Bonnie,
From my frequent monitoring, I would have to say that the only really
popular mode is PSK31. It is not uncommon now to have more PSK31 signals
within a 2.3 KHz passband, than even cw signals during a contest. Like
this weekend you might find 4 to 6 cw signals but you would find up to
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia 500/8 Center-of-Activity
14076kHz-14079kHz proposed
Bonnie,
From my frequent monitoring, I would have to say that the only really
popular mode is PSK31. It is not uncommon now to have more PSK31 signals
within a 2.3 KHz
On what bands Danny?
At 09:39 AM 2/20/06, you wrote:
You put your finger on what I see is a very bad problem that we are facing
as hams. The lack of international band plans.If mine is one freq, the
the dx is another freq, never the twain shall meet.
Need a Digital mode QSO?
On Monday 20 February 2006 08:40, KV9U wrote:
Bonnie,
What I would like to see are some practical bandplans that have a
recommended spot frequency for digital modes. We do have that by default
now on 20 meters for the .070 PSK31, and similar areas on 40 and 80
meters. The RTTY operation is
Tim,
You are reading way more than what was said. Nothing about the demise of
anything. You always have the diehards who operate older technology
equipment and modes. But I am saying that it is not as active as it once
was. Same thing can be said for CW. If you have a certain number of
active
where THEY are.
- Original Message -
From: KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia 500/8 Center-of-Activity
14076kHz-14079kHz proposed
Tim,
You are reading way more than what was said. Nothing about
If I remember correctly, it seems that some years ago, when the U.S.
expanded the phone band, either the band plan or the actual government
sub bands were further expanded in Canada so that the VE hams would
always have frequencies below the U.S. hams. It almost seemed a bit of
an exclusivity
- Original Message -
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies
Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented
complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to
check
uruytrytryutryutryutryutryutr
- Original Message -
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies
Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented
complains about Pactor III
- Original Message -
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia frequencies
Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented
complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to
check
At 12:43 PM 1/18/06, you wrote:
Hams need to start flooding the FCC with documented
complains about Pactor III QRMing when users fail to
check for a busy frequency or are using Ham spectrum
for illegal purposes (e.g. business purposes).
Did you ever stop to think maybe the guy * really * did
not
to
14073 and up for Olivia and other modes. ?
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:58
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
frequencies
At 12:43 PM 1/18/06, you wrote:Hams need
It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above
that is for voice,cw and image only.
- Original Message -
From:
Ross
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:34
AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Olivia
frequencies
Hi all,
with
: [digitalradio] Olivia
frequencies
It can legally go up to 14150, but anything above
that is for voice,cw and image only.
- Original Message -
From:
Ross
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 1:34
AM
Subject
, 2006 6:48
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
frequencies
It can legally go up to 14150, but anything
above that is for voice,cw and image only.
- Original Message -
From:
Ross
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
OK Now move to some country I havent worked 160 on. I am not hearing any
digital siganls from very many DX stations.
Danny
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Giella KN4LF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: a psk31 eGroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]; a PSK31 070 eGroup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; a Oliviadata eGroup
I had some problem with Mixw, and had to reload
here, and when went to the site, I cannot get the version 2.15 dual channel to
work. I keep getting an alarm flash that something is missing. I
thought I was using version 2.17 before, but dont find it here on the normal
site. Where is it?
I was able to auditorially hear both KN4LF and W4JSI (as I later
deduced) but was in the process of setting up the software and wiring
for a new computer and sound card. I could hear KN4LF, but could not see
his signal in the noise on the waterfall. After I finally got things set
up here in
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia on 160
Meters Tuesday Morning
I was able to auditorially hear both KN4LF and W4JSI (as I
later deduced) but was in the process of setting up the software and
wiring for a new computer and sound card. I could hear KN4LF, but could
not see
That might be your take but it won't happen. I have run a packet BBS on 14.098 for over 13 years. Come on down and try to get me a fine.If it's AUTO I'm not there! Rick Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period. And if an Active
Rick Scott wrote:
My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period.
And if an Active QSO is in progress, and the Auto op interferes with
that QSO its called Jamming and subject to fines PERIOD.
True, although the FCC seems to have taken a hands-off approach to the
Yes, mainly when another station decises to start a QSO on top of it. "Roger J. Buffington" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rick Scott wrote: My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period. And if an Active QSO is in progress, and the Auto op interferes with that QSO its
While they had NO RIGHT to tell you that. Don't be the one to complain when it runs over your QSO when it takes off if any of it is automatic.Maybe that's what he was trying to say.73 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 11/21/2005 7:47:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
At 09:58 PM 11/21/05, you wrote:
I wonder if it may be the 105 net that operates HF packet under full
automatic operation. They have been there for many years and so they start
to think they have a right to the frequency.
No. that last time I check into their network it was still keyboard to
My take is that the frequencies are NOT guaranteed by the FCC Period. And if an Active QSO is in progress, and the Auto op interferes with that QSO its called Jamming and subject to fines PERIOD. John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:58 PM 11/21/05, you wrote: I wonder if
At 08:55 PM 11/21/05, you wrote:
Looking at the band plan, as published by ARRL: 14.105- 14.112 IS listed
as packet freqs, for all that that means. 14.230 is listed as SSTV - and
we all know how often that is followed, especially during SSB contests
(this past weekend.) Also, the ARRL speaks
currently fit
into these slivers if semi automatic operation is used.
73,
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Danny Douglas
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 20:56
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia Coordination with ALE network
14109.5kHz USB
ALE looks like it achieves many of the goals I had hoped for Olivia for
use with self-spotting.
I wish there were more implementations of ALE in the digital mode
Is there not still packet BBS's operating from 14,101 to 14,108
(lsb) mode ?
At 07:02 AM 9/30/05, you wrote:
Olivia on Mixw seems to be runner. To avoid further chaos on 20 meter,
here a few hints!
Leave 14109.500 Khz free for MT63. (Some new MT63 stuff may be in the
pipeline)
Use channels
ALE looks like it achieves many of the goals I had hoped for Olivia for
use with self-spotting.
I wish there were more implementations of ALE in the digital mode
software, even of just decoding.
Leigh.
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 3:45 pm, expeditionradio wrote:
Coordination with ALE network 14109.5kHz
-
From:
Leigh L Klotz,
Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:55
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
Coordination with ALE network 14109.5kHz USB
ALE looks like it achieves many of the goals I had hoped
for Olivia for use with self
Good question, I have often been down to 14107 and
14108 and have not heard any packet in the past few weeks.
- Original Message -
From:
John Becker
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:35
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
more
CQ CQ CQ 3VF EA3VF EA3VFCQ CQ CQ de EA3VF EA3VF
EA3VFpse K
EA3VF EA3VF de KK7UQ KK7UQ KK7UQ
Knoted some intend to call me. here is jose ea3vf in
barcelona,
responding ro my call noted some station intended
to respond to me.
please go ahead.
this is ea3vf waiting por a call.
First, I have not used MFSK lately. However
the FEC add-on to this via Olivia seems to make it better in very weak
conditions, seems to handle QSB better than plain MFSK. I also found early
MFSK16 application a tad harder to lock on to that I would like , Olivia
is very easy. Perhaps
Hi Louie,
If you find where the MixW216 can be downloaded as I also would like to have
it. I have 215 but it does not have Olivia. 73, Bill Dawson W7TVF
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your
wd4kpd wrote:
help i have forgotten what the audio freq are used for olivia.
believe lowest freq is 500kc, so standard 1kc bw coveres
500 to 1kc. 1.5kc bw covers 500 to 1.5kc etc and on up to max 2kc of
bandwidth.
but when going down to less than 1kc of bw, doesnt the lowest limit
gMFSK for Linux (also on AI9NL's Hamshack Hack bootable CD) uses the
reference implementation and does add frills. It also startes at 500Hz
up, though, as it goes through the rig's audtio stage well.
Leigh / WA5ZNU
On Mon, 2 May 2005 3:35 pm, Paul L Schmidt wrote:
The lowest frequency is
At 10:23 PM 4/4/2005, you wrote:
If you tried to use Olivia at 250 Hz what kind of character speed would you
get? None are useable from what I have determined. In fact, I made up a
chart to reflect the practical number tones to BW and there aren't that
many. When you try to go faster than the
: RussellHltn
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 5:54 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Olivia
I'm just trying to clarify who said stop. You stated it was the
regional
office but then has been forwarded to the FCC which left a question
in my
mind
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia and DRM
Ron- please- you still have not told us which office of what organization
with what authority told you to cease and desist.
Please clarify.
Bill
At 06:05 PM 2/5/2005 -0500
/
- Original Message -
From: ronchap
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
Don't worry about Olivia anymore here in US at least.
The mode is not valid at this time. I'm afraid It's going the way of MIXW
in the
past.
73
Ron KA2HZO
- Original Message -
From: Joe Ivey
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia
Well Ron I guess I am in the same boat with you as I have also used both
modes. I have not received anything yet. How
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
