Hi Bernhard,
Bernhard Dippold wrote on 2011-06-10 00.25:
There has been a reply by Sophie, but I didn't make out any formal SC
discussion or decision on this topic.
As this covers more than just design and visual identity questions
(definition of teams, how to advertise teams and external
Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-06-13 17.19:
Counting votes we had: Florian, Charles, Andre, Olivier, Italo and
Sophie voting in favour; so I've made all of the edits in the wiki.
thanks a lot, Michael! I will ask the German community to translate the
changes back. :)
Thanks to everyone
Hi Toki,
toki wrote on 2011-06-10 19.16:
When I was reading German law on non-profits, my impression was the
By-Laws had to specify how members of the board of directors, and any
advisory board were selected, and mid-term replacements done.
I don't see anything in the by-laws that specifies
Italo,
2011/6/13 Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com
It looks like media are on our side.
Ask LH: Am I Missing Out By Sticking With Open Source And Not Buying
Microsoft ... on Lifehacker Australia
Hi :)
I thought the GPL, LGPL MPL were all much more permissive than the Apache
licenses? I thought the whole point of OpenSource was that it is
contra-intuitive. By insisting on intellectual freedoms, ideas are able to
build on each other more easily.
Regards from
Tom :)
Hi :)
I think it is better to do the minimum that is required to make it legal and
for
the rest write in things like Mid-term replacements are to be covered by
internal TDF policy which is to be reviewed regularly. In some cases it makes
sense to name the specific document that will cover
Hi :)
I thought everyone quickly checked that sort of thing anyway? I do. I thought
David was making a joke out of the need for people to be a little more aware of
one need for checking such rules. A serious point put forwards as a joke.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 6/14/11 9:21 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
This is indeed really good. Now, if IBM really throws in the code from Lotus
Symphony, we'll have to be prepared, as some journalists might change their
stance... Although probably not :-)
It would be nice to know what it might mean in practical
Hi,
I just updated the infos at the MC wiki page (improve the generic
agenda, so that it is showing, what we discuss; link to the minutes
page; add mailing list name for how to contact the MC).
And in addition to that: I feel sorry to say, that yesterday's meeting
had to be adjourned. I
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote on 2011-06-14 03.00:
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
you are still missing contributions from gmane
On 14 June 2011 06:55, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes.
How does that work? Surely if they licensed their work Apache it means there
is no need for the other licenses because the Apache license would
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2011 06:55, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes.
How does that work? Surely if they licensed their work Apache it
Am 14.06.2011 11:34, schrieb Keith Curtis:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 June 2011 06:55, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes.
How does that work?
Christoph Noack wrote:
Mmh, seems that might be me :-) I added this and several other
EasyHacks related to OOoNotes2 - our activities related to comments at
OpenOffice.org. Search in bugzilla:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change. That
way people not interested in setting up build servers, etc. can work here
while Apache
On 14 June 2011 11:38, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Christoph Jopp j...@gmx.de wrote:
Not automatically. Someone might want the more restrictive license
because he wants to mix it with other code with a license incompatible
to the least
From: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com
To: steering-disc...@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Tue, 14 June, 2011 13:15:05
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Fwd: Google Alert - libreoffice
On 6/14/11 9:21 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
This is indeed really
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 19:04, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see the desktop effort here at LibO and the developers at Apache
start on a new web based OOo even if that meant starting from scratch and
writing it in Javascript. Seems to me that without a web based version
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:49, todd rme toddrme2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see the desktop effort here at LibO and the developers at Apache
start on a new web based OOo even if that meant starting from scratch and
writing it in Javascript.
It's already been done:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:05, David Nelson comme...@traduction.biz wrote:
Hi Jim, BRM,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 00:43, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
There was,
and still is, the perception that TDF is an official, fully-
setup, self-controlled and self-existing foundation (similar
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:09, Greg Stein wrote:
Our charitable status specifically precludes us from competition.
What does it say about collaborating with others? Anything? (serious
question, I have no idea).
S.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:00, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change. That
way people not
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:16, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:00, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 06:55, Keith Curtis wrote:
Hi all;
I had an idea that you could offer to let people triple-license their
changes. LibreOffice can become an upstream of Apache with this change.
That
way people
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:09, Greg Stein wrote:
Our charitable status specifically precludes us from competition.
What does it say about collaborating with others? Anything? (serious
question, I have no idea).
In essence, as a
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:09, Greg Stein wrote:
Our charitable status specifically precludes us from competition.
What does it say about collaborating with others? Anything? (serious
this was discussed several months back in the marketing confcall which you
are free to download. I am not sure which month was it, maybe is written on
the minutes.
drew and ben were involved in the discussion
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/ConfCalls
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:47 AM,
Hi,
Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-14 10.44:
I think it is better to do the minimum that is required to make it legal and for
the rest write in things like Mid-term replacements are to be covered by
internal TDF policy which is to be reviewed regularly. In some cases it makes
sense to name the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/06/2011 15:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
How exactly would that work. So far the discussion was about moving code
around, but what about generating code for both?
As a practical matter, the code would have to modified to work as
expected
Cristoph wrote:
What I'm currently unsure about - how to proceed. Although I'm not
that convinced about voting, maybe it should be added to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Vote_for_Enhancement
Could you do that, please?
Well, I tried to. I made an account, got my email confirmed,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:39, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 16:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Here is a thougt, what if i just create a patch for Apache and submit the
same patch to LibO?
How exactly would that work. So far the discussion was about moving code
On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote:
For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions
become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not
be able to take it.[1]
Is the provenance that TDF secures at present sufficient for Apache's purposes?
I'm
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 14:04, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Greg Stein wrote:
For a larger body of work, these kinds of (non-CLA) contributions
become less clear. And without clear provenance, then Apache may not
be able to take it.[1]
Is the provenance
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
You describe how all the committers and people on the steering
committee know these details. Well, of course. But what about all the
people at Apache who are trying to learn about the work you guys have
done here? Trying to
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
That is great news! Reading over the archives, I was surprised
how some people who wished to contribute to both LOo and OOo
were turned away (with a we don't want your kind here),
and so seeing how LOo would now be open
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 17:04, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
You describe how all the committers and people on the steering
committee know these details. Well, of course. But what about all the
people at Apache who
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
We got our answer (before the vote) because Florian explained it. Our
point is that other people visiting the site will not have Florian's
attention. This has nothing to do with Apache, except by way of
example and that
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 17:52, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I don't think the questions that I posed had anything to do with
merging, but simply the kinds of curiosity that TDF supporters may
have (or those who may be interested in *becoming* supporters).
They are irrelevant to
Forking makes cooperation more expensive.
Your intentions are less important than your consequences.
Hello Keith,
As long as you are hung up on forks, you might want to get your facts right.
Sun created the official OOo distribution when they open sourced
StarOffice. Sun maintained control of
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
than your consequences.
Forking makes cooperation more expensive. Your intentions are less
important
Sounds like we'll have to agree to disagree.
From my side I would say it isn't that you guys don't have good
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Allen Pulsifer pulsi...@openoffice.orgwrote:
Forking makes cooperation more expensive.
Your intentions are less important than your consequences.
Hello Keith,
As long as you are hung up on forks, you might want to get your facts
right.
Sun created the
On 06/13/2011 11:29 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote on 2011-06-14 03.00:
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
42 matches
Mail list logo
