Hi,
I don't think the TDF Certification is meant to cover end users. It's meant
to cover professionnal service providers providing services to
customers/users.
I believe such a certification is an opportunity to advance TDF's
Sustainability and foster a business ecosystem around it. I think that
У чет, 23. 06 2011. у 10:41 +0100, Ian Lynch пише:
All it needs to do is have a set of criteria or even a simple
contractual statement that the partner company providing services on
behalf of the community will uphold community principles and not bring
it into disrepute.
Why the such
Le 22/06/11 14:18, Fernand Vanrie a écrit :
Hi Fernand,
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has decided to not allow
sending Emails using there API
imho the mechanism is in place
Well, one can already find :
const rtl::OUString
On 06/22/2011 08:18 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has decided to not
allow sending Emails using there API
I believe that all of these use the command line to send an email
message using an existing client, which then limits the message that can
be
On 06/21/2011 11:08 AM, drew wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 08:25 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I proposed a talk on OOo / LO and plan to attend. Did not put in much
time on the proposal so not sure if it will be accepted. If something is
happening there, count me in.
No formal
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:07 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/21/2011 11:08 AM, drew wrote:
snip
Anyway - would really be excited about you participating - I'm kind of
running blind as to what exactly is needed for this. Might be over
thinking it (I have that tendency at
Alex,
Thanks for yoyr reply, but how do we acces this with the API ?
Greetz
Fernand
Le 22/06/11 14:18, Fernand Vanrie a écrit :
Hi Fernand,
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has decided to not allow
sending Emails using there API
imho the mechanism is in place
Well,
Andrew ,
I use this option for years, just a pitty we can not do this using our
beloved API :-) and when making a extention not all users has the same
client on there machine
Greetz
Fernand
On 06/22/2011 08:18 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has
I hope Michael and other TDF-members are reading this.
As we love to have a Email body when sending emails with the API, our
compagny is willing to fund this kind of repair work.
The interested makes a Enhancement request
The TDF put a price on it
The interested pays TDF in advance
After TDF
Hi Fernand,
Fernand Vanrie wrote (23-06-11 16:08)
I hope Michael and other TDF-members are reading this.
As we love to have a Email body when sending emails with the API, our
company is willing to fund this kind of repair work.
Repair or enhancement...
(Side note on the subject: I can
Le 23/06/11 15:44, Fernand Vanrie a écrit :
Hi Fernand,
Thanks for yoyr reply, but how do we acces this with the API ?
Greetz
From my reading of the bits in the code I could find, it is not
implemented. Now that I think of it, I seem to recall that this all came
from the StarOffice
Hi Fernand,
Fernand Vanrie wrote (22-06-11 14:18)
For some reasons the developpers off the OO-API has decided to not allow
sending Emails using there API
[...]
Not sure if this has been mentioned already, and/or is of use for you,
but since years I use an dispatch command for the task:
Hi LeMoyne, et al
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 23:46 -0700, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
Seems to me this thread used to be longer in Nabble 8-0
Different Mailing List.
I am still interested Drew and I had this thought:
Even if a HackFest can't be drawn together it would be very useful to the
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:44 -0400, drew wrote:
big snip
So - my thinking here is that the important items to have in place
(someone) has to be able to competently field/handle/help with the
following:
Getting the source code from the GIT repositories.
Finding the Easy Hacks page.
Work
Why should'nt TDF go ahead and employ one of the former OOo developers or
someone else from the community?
I think there would be much interest from users and companys to pay for fixing
bugs / implementing new features.
- Ursprüngliche Message -
Von: Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl
An:
Il 23/06/2011 16:29, Cor Nouws ha scritto:
Hi Fernand,
Fernand Vanrie wrote (23-06-11 16:08)
I hope Michael and other TDF-members are reading this.
As we love to have a Email body when sending emails with the API, our
company is willing to fund this kind of repair work.
Repair or
Hi Samuel,
Samuel M wrote (23-06-11 17:06)
Why should'nt TDF go ahead and employ one of the former OOo
developers or someone else from the community? I think there would be
much interest from users and companys to pay for fixing bugs /
implementing new features.
Employing people is not such
Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Samuel,
Samuel M wrote (23-06-11 17:06)
Why should'nt TDF go ahead and employ one of the former OOo
developers or someone else from the community? I think there would be
much interest from users and companys to pay for fixing bugs /
implementing new features.
Employing
Just a quick note.
Have sent off the formal request to the OHLF organizers..will keep folks
posted as specifics firm up.
Thanks,
drew
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List
Hello *,
http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110623
Namastè *!
--
cico
Icq/Licq/Gaim #175451007
Debian Powered Linux Registered User #310800 at http://counter.li.org
No retreat baby no surrender
http://www.retenergie.it - coop di produttori e utilizzatori di energia da
fonti rinnovabili
Marc Paré wrote:
This thread is really about proposing, to the devs, the possibility of
creating a LibreOffice Reader similar to the Adobe .pdf Reader.
This could be an idea to investigate, but I don't know how feasible it
is; actually there is (or used to be) a read only mode in
Simon Phipps wrote:
On 23 Jun 2011, at 23:32, Marc Paré wrote:
I think it was mentioned that there were at one point over 100 million LibreOffice/OOo
users. If we were to develop our own LibreOffice Reader we would already have
100 million potential users for our product. Not only that,
Here is another free one (for Windows only)
http://www.officeviewers.com
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/New-LibreOffice-Reader-Eliminates-Need-for-PDF-Reader-tp3101887p3102326.html
Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
From: Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] New LibreOffice Reader Eliminates Need for PDF
Reader
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 3:32 PM
Hi Antonio
Le 2011-06-23 18:05, Antonio
On 2011-06-24, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
if we were to promote a quick and dirty
LibreOffice Reader, very much like the Adobe Acrobat Reader, whose
sole purpose is to provide the ability to read .odt files, there
would be no need to carry .pdf formatted files.
Heh. :-)
@Mark others
I like the idea, don't get me wrong. But sadly it is hard for developers out
there to make just a viewer when some other folks have that :( already. It
would be nice if more people, sed -i 's|people|users|g' out there would use the
OpenDocument format (*.odt) and not pdf to
Simon Phipps wrote:
On 23 Jun 2011, at 23:32, Marc Paré wrote:
I think it was mentioned that there were at one point over 100
million LibreOffice/OOo users. If we were to develop our own
LibreOffice Reader we would already have 100 million potential
users for our product. Not only that, the
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:40 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
OK, this is just a teaser to entice people into a discussion of the
following proposal.
There is talk on the documentation list of the formats made available to
users of our documents (manuals, reference books, etc). These for now
are in .odt
Marc Paré wrote:
This thread is really about proposing, to the devs, the possibility of
creating a LibreOffice Reader similar to the Adobe .pdf Reader.
This could be an idea to investigate, but I don't know how feasible it
is; actually there is (or used to be) a read only mode in
OpenOffice.org
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than diversifying
right now into PDF reader. Also no point inventing the wheel again when
there are several open source pdf readers available which we can integrate
instead of developing one of our own.
Won't it be a better idea to
On 23 June 2011 22:40, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
OK, this is just a teaser to entice people into a discussion of the
following proposal.
There is talk on the documentation list of the formats made available to
users of our documents (manuals, reference books, etc). These for now are
Le 2011-06-23 17:48, Ian Lynch a écrit :
Main problem is you are effectively competing with MS Office readers that do
a similar job wit .doc but have never displaced pdf. So I think the chances
of a LibO reader displacing pdf are not very high.
IMO, we can take into account the MSO readers,
Le 2011-06-23 22:59, Varun Mittal a écrit :
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than diversifying
right now into PDF reader. Also no point inventing the wheel again when
there are several open source pdf readers available which we can integrate
instead of developing one of
Details here: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/201106/msg00061.html
This is a public review.
From the announcement, which provides all details on locating the specification
and background on the process:
Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use
of the OASIS
Varun Mittal wrote:
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than diversifying
right now into PDF reader. Also no point inventing the wheel again when
there are several open source pdf readers available which we can integrate
instead of developing one of our own.
I am
I use a pdf reader called foxit when I am forced to fire up my windows VMs.
I am not sure of its licensing.
On Jun 24, 2011 12:26 AM, Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com
wrote:
Varun Mittal wrote:
I personally feel we have more important set of priorities than
diversifying
right now
My Windows 7 C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Reader 10.0\ folder is 181 MB.
Where do you get the 6 GB?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Derman [mailto:robert.der...@pressenter.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2011 21:24
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] New
On 24/06/2011 03:59, Marc Paré wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
This thread is really about proposing, to the devs, the possibility of
creating a LibreOffice Reader similar to the Adobe .pdf Reader.
This could be an idea to investigate, but I don't know how feasible it
is; actually there is (or used to
38 matches
Mail list logo
