On 05/02/2012 Florian Effenberger wrote:
Jesús Corrius wrote on 2012-02-03 14:08:
We had a huge problem in the OpenOffice.org Conference 2007 in
Barcelona as more than 1000 people registered for the conference and
at the end there were no more than 250 people appeared. ...
We should have a
On 28/12/2011 Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Danishka Navin wrote:
Why we still continue the Floppy Disk as the icon for Save button in
LibreOffice?
When was the last time you saw a phone that look like
http://iphonestudio.co.uk/images/uber_iphone_phone_logo.jpg
On 21/12/2011 Pedro wrote:
Do you mean the (L)GPL license allows people to sell copies of LibreOffice?
I thought it only allowed to charge for production/distribution costs...
It does allow to sell copies, and the Free Software Foundation
encourages it. See
On 05/12/2011 Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Whoever hit that trap:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/7271
might probably think scary where to post, and where not.
Well, that specific message is probably not a good example, since in the
end it was more useful to the
Regina Henschel wrote:
All mailing lists I'm described to (and
believe me that are a lot) behave in the way that a click on Antwort
auf diese Nachricht replies to the list. So keep the
documentfoundation.org lists to behave this way too.
Only @lists.freedesktop.org behave not that way and that
On 10/11/2011 Florian Effenberger wrote:
So, a quick +1/-1 in this thread would be nice to get an overview
Mine is -1 to be read as: I would be in favor of an own URL with own
branding but the same database as http://user.services.openoffice.org
since this would be best for users (and,
On 08/11/2011 Cor Nouws wrote:
For some time, I could personally live quite well with a forum that is
clearly, visibly, independent serving LibreOffice and other suites.
Since suggestions made in that direction seem to be more political than
technical feasible, I can leave that illusion.
Does
Cor Nouws wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote (05-11-11 13:02)
when it comes to user support the people
involved are much more pragmatic
That would be my expectation too. And then 'people involved', I would
read as those with questions, answers and with moderation tasks.
Yes, that was my
On 31/10/2011 Florian Effenberger wrote:
What I would like to have is one
official LibO forum, either done by us or someone else, that is open
for all languages, and run by a group that does not have members who
openly show hostility towards TDF. I am not saying that everyone does
so, but at
On 29/10/2011 Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Even if I tried not to compromise my real life by my LibreOffice
activities, I had to realize, that I can't reach this goal
Thanks Bernhard for your long history of contributions to OpenOffice.org
and later LibreOffice. I understand that the time comes
e-letter wrote:
It is difficult to understand why a business
would waste time trying to use LO; if a customer uses m$, the supplier
might as well do so also and consider the m$ price as a cost of
conducting business.
I've seen plenty of small, medium and large businesses that chose to use
a
André Schnabel wrote:
There is one special item Discuss and Clarify TDF position on C. Our
position on this is quite clear and has been communicated several time.
But there was a suggestion to have a discussion on this last year
(Michael Meeks to discuss with Andrea Pescetty).
Do we want to
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 14:45 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
everybody (now!) knows the priority of the Document Foundation
has been to stick to the licenses it had unilaterally chosen, before
discussing any further options; this is perfectly understandable
Marc Paré wrote:
This thread is really about proposing, to the devs, the possibility of
creating a LibreOffice Reader similar to the Adobe .pdf Reader.
This could be an idea to investigate, but I don't know how feasible it
is; actually there is (or used to be) a read only mode in
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If I am the copyright holder of my code, I can issue it with a license
that requires anyone who modifies my source code to provide me with
the changes to my code that they make. ...
PS: It is the case that neither the GPL nor APLv2 have such a
compulsory condition
On 01/06/2011 Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:51:09AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/
TDF's statement included :
Today we welcome Oracle’s donation of
M Henri Day wrote:
2011/5/28 Stefan Weigel stefan.weigel@...
As far as I know, it´s an issue of data volume on the download servers.
Which, no doubt, is an question of money.
Actually it is just a choice: it does lower the barrier for someone to
host a mirror, but the size and upload time are
On 25/05/2011 Regina Henschel wrote:
Steve Edmonds schrieb:
Currently it is in English Data points order, that are 17 characters,
in German we have Ordnung für Stützpunkte, that are 23 characters,
Spanish has 28 characters and fills the dialog area completely.
Interpolation Polynomial
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Has Oracle given permission for TDF to use its forum, or doesn't TDF need
such permission? Does TDF *want* to use an Oracle resource?
I think Drew has already explained this on multiple mailing lists,
anyway: the forums at http://user.services.openoffice.org/ are run by
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Or maybe people did join, waited a little and then left again without
writing a word, because the channel itself was silent.
This was more or less my case. I connected in the afternoon European
time, I saw no activity at all for one hour, I realized that
12PM (i.e.,
On 18/03/2011 Kazunari Hirano wrote:
We Japanese, from the bottom of our heart, appreciate your help and
supports form abroad.
If you take a look at some articles in my blog http://openoffice.exblog.jp/
you will see the grave situation.
Thanks khirano for your reconstruction efforts and
On 13/03/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote:
Am Sonntag, 13. März 2011, 04:39:15 schrieb Kunal Singh:
View Toolbars Drawing Vertical Text not working.
I tried with LibreOffice 3.3.2-x64-rc1 on openSUSE 11.3-x64 KDE 4.4.4 and I
can't
persuade the icon for vertical text to appear in the drawing
On 09/03/2011 NoOp wrote:
Note: it seems that I've fallen into this category on the OOo list;
after 5 years of posts, I'm suddenly no longer subscribed, nor can I
comment on OOo bug reports any longer unless I create a new
username/password... but that's another story
Yes, that is another
Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 3/9/11 9:53 PM, RGB ES wrote:
support to both, OOo and LibO and to help the Spanish localization of
both projects under the same umbrella (something similar to PLIO
project for Italian(1)). ...
Totally wrong. PLIO at the moment is divided between people that want to
Joe Rotello wrote:
On the subject of an example of the Email received...
Here's my initially-received copy. I include the header info for ones
perusal.
OK, then I confirm what I wrote in
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg05281.html
and others confirmed in the
On 26/02/2011 Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
You can copy and paste it here,of course :-)
Since nobody forwarded the message in the end, and I didn't receive it
myself, I can only speculate it is the expected message notifying all
openoffice.org (the site, not OpenOffice.org the software) users about
On 25/01/2011 Gianluca Turconi wrote:
I post here because I've just read a message about credits in LibO 3.3 and
so I've checked them ... I' haven't found among the
contributors the name of Davide Prina, co-author of the Italian
spellchecker dictionary. ...
Furthermore, I've checked the
Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13:48AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Besides that, distros will have to continue libreoffice-build, which does
still contain patches. (Removing those would be a big regression about
what we ship right now)
Thanks. So some distributions will
On 19/01/2011 Cor Nouws wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote (18-01-11 21:13)
LibreOffice bugs like
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg04508.html
... The bug you point to, does not suggest that they will make substantial
changes, though?
Well, at a first glance I'd say
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
If You think, it beeing a good thing to have a posting guidelines
pointer in the footer, then I'll be glad to put it in there for all
active Mailinglists.
I agree it's a good thing to have it, and I suggest to seize this
opportunity to get rid of the eternity
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
My current version comparing with previsious version:
3.3.0 RC4 - WIN7 (64bit) German UI [OOO330m19 (build 6 / tag 3.3.0.4)]
3.3.0 RC3 - WIN7 (64bit) German UI [OOO330m19 (build 5 / tag 3.3.0.3)]
I am astonished to see OOO300m19 for both
OpenOffice.org 3.3-RC9
Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Jonathan Aquilina schrieb:
I was cleaning out my junk folder to find there were at least 7 emails
which Thunderbird was nice enough to filter from my gmail inbox.
These for shure were mails sent to one of the mailinglists? To which
one? ... No single one coming
On 09/01/2011 Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
I think that we should have a webpage where Linux distributions who are
packaging LibO, could list what changes they made compared to the
official build by TDF. ...
So, is it a good idea to ask the Linux distributions to publish the
changes they made
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Brazilian version has traditionally (i.e. OOo-times) been a different
package/has not been called OpenOffice.org in Brazil, but BrOffice due
to trademark issues. ...
Yep - but since BrOffice is a well-established brand, and under
Sigrid Carrera wrote:
2010/11/24 Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org:
What do others think? I still clearly favor the non-poetic version ;)
I have no real preference. But in my opinion, the non-poetic version
looks to me more professional. So I vote for this one.
I will very
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Mateusz Zasuwik mzasu...@gmail.com wrote ...
http://www.webmasterpro.de/portal/news/2010/02/05/international-openoffice-market-shares.html
http://ooblog.pl/2010/02/06/polska-swiatowym-liderem-we-wdrozeniu-openoffice/(polish)
The study relies on extricating fonts
Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
I don't know if and how easy this would be in drupal. So far I have
coded a very simple webform in django (python is my thing :-)) to
allow uploading a document and a comment.
This would be elementary in Drupal.
The only thing that is then left, is to link the
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
Honestly, I believe new developers joined because the bar for
contribution was lowered ...
the paperwork reduction may have helped too, but I don't see
it as the most effective improvement.
The paperwork was only a practical detail
that the bug is obsolete
and at the same time complain it is being ignored, but if it is
meaningful it can be solved in LibreOffice or upstream in OpenOffice.org.
Best regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http
then need to be confirmed with every developer; while with a copyright
agreement/assignment in place, the Document Foundation could effectively
represent a measurable percentage of the codebase, and its opinion be
weighed accordingly.
Best regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
Unsubscribe instructions
Fridrich Strba wrote:
I changed the occurences of LO in the build to LibO.
Please, could you come to an agreement?
I think it's kind of official, see
http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/msg00430.html
Regards,
Andrea.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for
in the situation Jean correctly described as
messy.
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived
and hyphenation
patterns: see
http://download.services.openoffice.org/files/extended/3.2.1rc2/
Is LibreOffice's packaging different from this point of view? And why?
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives
that qatrack.services.openoffice.org,
the current instance of QATrack, is on community-run servers and that a
fresh installation wouldn't be problematic.
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
in the
public opinion.
At least, I recommend that new tests are written for any LibreOffice
specific functionality, that we have a tool to track them (kind of TCM)
and a tool to track releases (QATrack being the natural candidate here).
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e
here and there these days.
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists
/Assignments as inherently bad: very respectable Foundations
promoting Free Software do use them, in the interest of their projects,
and a trustworthy Foundation should not be afraid to ask for them.
Best regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
discuss+unsubscr
47 matches
Mail list logo
