Quoting TomW:
To use Ctrl F as the shortcut for 'Alternate dialog Find Replace for Writer',
do the following:
Open 'Alternate dialog Find Replace for Writer'
Click on 'Batch ', the Batch Manager
Click on 'Key Shortcuts'
In the top dropdown box, select 'Altsearch - dialog'.
At the bottom of
Quoting Graham Lauder:
There is an extension which is pretty much a compulsory install on any OOo
instance l use and it does what you ask here.
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/search/node/altsearch
Thanks! It does indeed do what I want (and a lot more). Now if I can just
On 2010-11-03 17:11, Peter Rodwell wrote:
Quoting Graham Lauder:
There is an extension which is pretty much a compulsory install on
any OOo
instance l use and it does what you ask here.
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/en/search/node/altsearch
Thanks! It does indeed do what I
There were several old, often commented on, and often requested bug fixes
and features that didn't receive much attention or weren't resolved with OOo
over the years.
For those who may not be aware of the reasons for the shift/fork, or for
those who don't care about politics with software,
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office 2010
instead of switching to OO/LO:
1. Complete file compatibility. I frequently handle documents with very complex
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office 2010
instead of switching to OO/LO:
Did
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office 2010
instead of switching to OO/LO:
1.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
If this stupid comment is typical of this forum, then I'm out
of here.
I don't think we need Microsoft shills anyway.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines:
Hi Cor:
2. Search and replace. I work with large documents, often 400+ pages.
[snip]
OK, that is easy to handle with a trick as user, but possibly also an relative
easy fix (1)?
As I said, when you have to do this constantly, dozens of times a day, it does
become a real issue.
I would
T. J. Brumfield wrote:
There were several old, often commented on, and often requested bug fixes
and features that didn't receive much attention or weren't resolved with OOo
over the years.
For those who may not be aware of the reasons for the shift/fork, or for
those who don't care about
Peter Rodwell wrote:
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this has
already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office
2010
instead of switching to OO/LO:
1. Complete file compatibility. I frequently handle
Quoting Robert Derman:
On a separate subject, to Peter above, I can see where your profession
certainly justifies the expenditure for MS
Office, I would hope however that you at least downloaded and installed OOo/LO
in addition, since it costs little or
nothing and might at times prove
On 2010-11-02 11:48 AM, Peter Rodwell wrote:
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office
2010 instead of switching to OO/LO:
1. Complete file compatibility. I frequently handle documents with
very complex formatting. These come from my clients, all of whom use
MS
On 2010-11-02 12:05 PM, Frank Esposito wrote:
File compatibility should be a priority, in the very least opening and
saving MSO files with full compatibility
There will *never* be 100% compatibility... like I said earlier, even
Microsoft doesn't achieve that between different versions of its
On 2010-11-02 12:07 PM, Robert Parker wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Peter Rodwell pe...@intorg.org wrote:
If this stupid comment is typical of this forum, then I'm out
of here.
I don't think we need Microsoft shills anyway.
Robert - if you don't have anything constructive to say,
True. However, the good news is that the 2007 and 2010 formats are largely
similar and are XML based. The old formats were binary and kept changing.
Since the format isn't changing as much, and the new format is easier to
reverse-engineer, now is a good opportunity for OOo/LibO to catch up and
Quoting Charles Marcus:
There will *never* be 100% compatibility... like I said earlier, even
Microsoft doesn't achieve that between different versions of its own
programs.
Oddly, I can't offhand remember having any backwards compatibility problems.
I have had very occasional problems loading
In data martedì 02 novembre 2010 16:48:46, Peter Rodwell ha scritto:
I have only today joined this discussion so I don't know whether this
has already been discussed or not.
There are two reasons why I have just paid money to upgrade to Office
2010 instead of switching to OO/LO:
1.
On Wednesday 03 Nov 2010 06:11:02 Peter Rodwell wrote:
Hi Cor:
2. Search and replace. I work with large documents, often 400+ pages.
[snip]
OK, that is easy to handle with a trick as user, but possibly also an
relative easy fix (1)?
As I said, when you have to do this constantly,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2010 03:48 PM, Peter Rodwell wrote:
1. Complete file compatibility. I frequently handle documents with very
complex formatting.
Funny thing here.
I get better compatibility using OOo and LibO, than I did when I was
using MSO. I still
20 matches
Mail list logo
