I guess what Thorsten means is that in the case of the board discuss list
Nabble might be misconfigured. Jean Weber and David Nelson posted on it
less than a month ago, so at least it works with the standard mailing list
usage. Besides the BoD always intended to make this list a list where
members
Thorsten Behrens wrote
> No idea - if you subscribe via
> board-discuss+subscribe@
> , you can post w/o
> moderation, like on every other TDF mailing list. Nabble
> misconfiguration?
It is not a misconfiguration. It is a different configuration.
I think you are misinterpreting the words "Public
Pedro wrote:
> I'm not sure that is the idea. Otherwise you would not get the following
> message when you try to post to that list on Nabble
>
> " Authorized Users Only
> Only authorized users can proceed in this area. You can use the form below
> to send a request to the administrators.
> Access
Thorsten Behrens wrote
> terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
> entry on http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/ was worded
> like that ("Public discussions of the Board of Directors"), but I'm
> rather certain it should read "List for focused interaction of the
>
Marc Paré wrote:
> Thanks. I am subscribed to that list, but was not aware that the
> membership was allowed to join in. I thought that that particular
> list was for board discussion only by board members only.
>
Hi Marc,
terribly sorry if we ever gave that impression. Admittedly, the
entry on h
Le 2012-09-30 17:35, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Here is my feedback after having read the document:
Thanks a lot Marc for your very detailed review. Since the board has
already approved the earlier version, would you be ok if we table
your suggestions for a little while? It's
Le 2012-09-30 17:41, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Is is just me or has this announcement not been passed on GMane? It
shows in the regular mailing list that I receive in my inbox, but
does not show at all on my GMane which is what I monitor.
Hi Marc,
it seems to be there now:
Marc Paré wrote:
> Is is just me or has this announcement not been passed on GMane? It
> shows in the regular mailing list that I receive in my inbox, but
> does not show at all on my GMane which is what I monitor.
>
Hi Marc,
it seems to be there now:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.document
Marc Paré wrote:
> Here is my feedback after having read the document:
>
Thanks a lot Marc for your very detailed review. Since the board has
already approved the earlier version, would you be ok if we table
your suggestions for a little while? It's not unlikely we'll have to
update the rules of p
Here is my feedback after having read the document:
The overall format is fine, however, the title format should be the same
throughout. In EN, titles are usually capitalized and should follow
these conventional rules[1] -- ALL section titles should be checked to
follow these rules.
Is is just me or has this announcement not been passed on GMane? It
shows in the regular mailing list that I receive in my inbox, but does
not show at all on my GMane which is what I monitor. Is it because it
carries an attachment?
It this is so, then it means that community members on GMane a
11 matches
Mail list logo
