2011/6/22 Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org:
I checked those files as well. They are all 'noarch' (do not contain
compiled programs; No Architecture),
and contain the same .png branding images.
The license not only covers the code, also the images. So if those
images are in the program, the
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:18:34 +0200
Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org wrote:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box
which says that if we are interested in the source code, we should
read a specific Wiki page,
for example
Manfred Usselmann wrote:
I see a problem here. Usually GNU/Linux distributions make
modifications to the original source code. That means that the *real*
source code will be the one from your distro and not the one you can
download from the LibO website, hence the information will be
2011/6/21 Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which
says that if we are interested in the source code, we should read a
specific Wiki page,
for example
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/AvailabilityOfSourceCode
I
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
2011/6/21 Jesús Corriusje...@softcatala.org:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which
says that if we are interested in the source code, we should read a
specific Wiki page,
for example
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Sveinn í Felli svei...@nett.is wrote:
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
2011/6/21 Jesús Corriusje...@softcatala.org:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which
says that if we are interested in the source code,
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 12:11, skrifaði Sveinn í Felli:
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
2011/6/21 Jesús Corriusje...@softcatala.org:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About
dialog box which
says that if we are interested in the source code, we
should read a
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 12:46, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Sveinn í Fellisvei...@nett.is wrote:
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
2011/6/21 Jesús Corriusje...@softcatala.org:
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Sveinn í Felli svei...@nett.is wrote:
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 12:46, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Sveinn í Fellisvei...@nett.is wrote:
Þann þri 21.jún 2011 11:18, skrifaði Simos Xenitellis:
2011/6/21 Jesús
I checked those files as well. They are all 'noarch' (do not contain
compiled programs; No Architecture),
and contain the same .png branding images.
The license not only covers the code, also the images. So if those
images are in the program, the source code must include them.
That's why the
On 2011-06-18 5:39 AM, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
And there is no better way to do this than have the 'git repositories'
of the LibreOffice source code.
You were correct earlier - he is merely pointing out that nowhere in the
license agreement (I haven't read it so am not making the same claim)
Dennis, Tanstaafl,
I take your point. Users that have 3.3.2 installed can only get the code
for 3.3.3 from the website. As discussed above, I think this meets the
spirit of the license but not the specific letter. Simon's idea about
downloading the repo at the 3.3.2 marker is a great one, but
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:22 PM, John LeMoyne Castle
lemoyne.cas...@gmail.com wrote:
Dennis, Tanstaafl,
I take your point. Users that have 3.3.2 installed can only get the code
for 3.3.3 from the website. As discussed above, I think this meets the
spirit of the license but not the specific
1. We want to add a paragraph somewhere in the About dialog box which
says that if we are interested in the source code, we should read a
specific Wiki page,
for example
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/AvailabilityOfSourceCode
I see a problem here. Usually GNU/Linux
On 18/06/2011 09:39, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
The spirit does go well beyond the letter.
Ideally, the 'git repositories' should be what everyone gets, rather
than a source code snapshot that has no source change history.
A couple of years ago I sent a question to FSF about meeting source code
-Original Message-
From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 17:44
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL
enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Ignoring the repetition on who is entitled to source code and how they are told
about it, I would like to know the answers to some very specific, tangible
matters closer to home. My
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Ignoring the repetition on who is entitled to source code and how they are
told about it, I would like to know the answers to some very specific,
tangible matters closer to home. My question is basically
I didn't say I didn't know how to do it. I didn't say I wanted to build it.
This is about honoring the spirit of the free software promise. It is not even
about building the code. People may want to do any number of things with the
source code (inspect for bugs, for example).
I *did* say I
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I didn't say I didn't know how to do it. I didn't say I wanted to build it.
This is about honoring the spirit of the free software promise. It is not
even about building the code. People may want to do any
20 matches
Mail list logo
