-Original Message-
From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 17:44
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: Availability of source code (Was: Re: OFF TOPIC about GPL
enforcement (Was: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: [Libreoffice] Proposal to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:08 AM, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yet, Calligra and KOffice - which both have very similar codebases - have a
much
healthier relationship, etc. They don't see themselves as competing with
Hi,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-15 17.28:
Maybe it's a language issue, but no, the imprint does nothing
at all to make it clear. It simply says, in effect, FroDev wrote
the content and they are responsible for the content on
the site. It says nothing at all about the legal structure
at all.
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Uwe Altmann o...@altsys.de wrote:
Hi Garry
Am 17.06.11 23:45, schrieb NoOp:
In the past I'd answered a few questions regarding OOo ECCN[1] and
pointed the poster to Sun's ECCN[2]. What are the implications for LO
general with regards to ECCN? I do see that
Op 18-6-2011 12:35, Florian Effenberger schreef:
Hi,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-15 17.28:
Maybe it's a language issue, but no, the imprint does nothing
at all to make it clear. It simply says, in effect, FroDev wrote
the content and they are responsible for the content on
the site. It says
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
snip
I guess a slight risk that needs to be taken care of exists in all
constellations. In the worst (!) situation, Apache could die as foundation,
so could TDF. For TDF, it is rather unlikely, as German
Simos Xenitellis wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Ignoring the repetition on who is entitled to source code and how they are told
about it, I would like to know the answers to some very specific, tangible
matters closer to home. My
On 18 Jun 2011, at 11:35, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-15 17.28:
Maybe it's a language issue, but no, the imprint does nothing
at all to make it clear. It simply says, in effect, FroDev wrote
the content and they are responsible for the content on
the
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
from making them.
- Original Message
From: Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
On 18 Jun 2011, at 11:35, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2011-06-15 17.28:
Maybe it's a language issue, but no, the imprint does nothing
at all to make it clear. It simply says, in effect, FroDev wrote
- Original Message
From: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, June 18, 2011 10:19:41 AM
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice +US Gov't ECCN Export Control
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Uwe Altmann o...@altsys.de
I have a few observations to make, as to future changes/improvements.
I for one am very reluctant to frequently upgrade any major software
application that must be downloaded and replaced in its entirety,
particularly if there is not a published list of the improvements in
the new
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2011-06-16 08.18:
If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors
to determine this.
Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and
put it all in this direction put don't fix it.
So it will be a (first)
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Florian Effenberger
flo...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi,
this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give our +1
as recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be hard to bind
them on decisions they have not taken.
Hi,
Florian Effenberger wrote on 2011-06-15 12.45:
is there a slight grammar mistake in the bylaws? They read
change is incorporated now.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 |
Hi Cor,
On 18/06/2011 13:11, Cor Nouws wrote:
[...]
I've seen that you have several membership applications to check, do you
want me to take care of them, do you want us to share them? What do you
prefer ?
Well, if you easily find time to do it, I would really appreciate that
you pick them
Hi all,
On 18/06/2011 09:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2011-06-16 08.18:
If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors
to determine this.
Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and
put it all in
From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 12:51:17
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium
Hi all,
On 18/06/2011 09:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
klaus-jürgen
Hello everyone
this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give our
+1 as
recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be hard to bind
them
on decisions they have not taken.
No problem for me as long as TDF is represented.
I think that if we go down that
From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 19:18:40
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
I think that
Charles-H. Schulz wrote (18-06-11 16:50)
I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
on it.
The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
from making them.
Indeed.
Since I am receiving reminders about my individual membership in OASIS, I can
answer that question:
No. There is no specific enrollment period or fixed calendar of memberships.
Annual memberships are for the full year from the day a membership application
is accepted.
Since you are
Thanks much for the details.
//drew
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 15:42 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Since I am receiving reminders about my individual membership in OASIS, I can
answer that question:
No. There is no specific enrollment period or fixed calendar of memberships.
Annual
Hi
Can we add them to the support page?
Thanks
Olivier
Mensagem original
Assunto:Manifiesto de apoyo.
Data: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:50:06 -0500
De: Gerardo Sagbay - Grupo Informático gerardo_sag...@grupoinfoec.com
Para: i...@documentfoundation.org
Manifiesto de
24 matches
Mail list logo
