Re: [tdf-discuss] Mac App Store

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:57 PM, todd rme wrote: >> And for iOS (iPhone and the like, FYI) >> http://developer.apple.com/news/ios/appstoretips/ >> >> Technically, I would say LibO meets all (most?) the requirements needed. > > I don't think it meets these: > > - It duplicates apps already in the A

[tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store

On 2011/01/07 12:57 AM Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Someone also mentioned there are issues with GPL licensing that Apple doesn't seem to like :-/ And the license has nothing to do with an application installing on a Mac computer. I have several GPL and LGPL licensed applications installed. Lar

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store

Someone also mentioned there are issues with GPL licensing that Apple doesn't seem to like :-/ On 1/7/11 6:49 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: On 2011/01/06 11:05 PM todd rme wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: Apple does not control what software I install on my computer. Q

[tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store

On 2011/01/06 11:05 PM todd rme wrote: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: Apple does not control what software I install on my computer. Quit spreading such BS. They do if you are using an iPad (unless you have hacked it). As I said, Apple does not control what software i

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > > On 2011/01/06 9:57 PM  todd rme wrote: >> >> I do find it bizarre that people are so up in arms about OOXML but >> seem to have no complaints with Apple's blatant attempts to have total >> control over the software you are allowed to install

[tdf-discuss] Re: Mac App Store

On 2011/01/06 9:57 PM todd rme wrote: I do find it bizarre that people are so up in arms about OOXML but seem to have no complaints with Apple's blatant attempts to have total control over the software you are allowed to install on your own computer. Apple does not control what software I ins

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mac App Store

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Benjamin Horst wrote: >> Does anyone know the technical requirements needed to get into the Mac App >> Store? >> Are there any developers here who'd like to get involved in this process? > Here is the guidel

Re: [tdf-discuss] Mac App Store

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Benjamin Horst wrote: > Does anyone know the technical requirements needed to get into the Mac App > Store? > Are there any developers here who'd like to get involved in this process? Here is the guidelines for submission to App Store http://www.everythingicafe.com

[tdf-discuss] Mac App Store

The Mac App Store launched today with over 1,000 applications: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ Its purpose is similar to Linux package managers, but much more consumer focused, and I think it represents an enormous opportunity for LibO--how else can we be listed right alongside MS Office an

Re: [tdf-discuss] What about NeoOff ice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts?

Il 06/01/2011 20:04, Italo Vignoli ha scritto: On 01/06/2011 10:59 AM, Carlo Strata wrote: What are we waiting for?? We have been in touch with Ed Peterlin and Patrick Luby. Any step in any direction will not happen before The Document Foundation has been established as a legal entity.

Re: [tdf-discuss] What about NeoOff ice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts?

On 01/06/2011 10:59 AM, Carlo Strata wrote: What are we waiting for?? We have been in touch with Ed Peterlin and Patrick Luby. Any step in any direction will not happen before The Document Foundation has been established as a legal entity. -- Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation E-m

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Nobody told me, that's the problem, i have been asking a lot about that, and nobody seems to be interested, nor knows anything. So that's why I'm wondering why. I think that is the future, there will be less and less fat client apps, and more and more browser based apps. The main reason is interope

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

2011/1/6 Jaime R. Garza : > I'm wondering why libre office is not interested > in developing an HTML5 complete office Suite. > Who told you that? An html5 app based on LibO does not exists yet, that's clear, but that does not mean it will never be one. LibO is a FOSS project, the only thing needed

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Well for a reader is not such a big deal if it's HTML5 or nor, but if there were a Office Suite, like Microsoft Docs & Google Docs, that should be in HTML5! But apparently no one has started such a thing and no one seems to be interested. IBM is working on one and Oracle is already offering one, at

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Hi Jaime, At 17:52 6/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote: i think it would be great to have a HTML5 LO, which will only need a browser. The could be installed locallz or on a server. There would only be need for one version that supports the 4 major browsers. Are you aware of WebODF

Re: [tdf-discuss] Fwd: [marketing] Search at the beginning

Yes ... sort of a "wrap around" the document, that is my expectation ... Rogerio 2011/1/5 Andy Brown > On Tue Jan 04 2011 19:39:29 GMT-0800 (PST) todd rme wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Rogerio Luz Coelho >> wrote: >> >>> 2011/1/5 Augustine Souza >>> >>> So long as the search b

Re: [tdf-discuss] What about NeoOff ice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts?

Il 06/01/2011 13:27, Fabián Rodríguez ha scritto: On 11-01-06 04:59 AM, Carlo Strata wrote: Hi Everyone! Happy new year! What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts? [...] What notable advantages (other than logistic) are there to use Neo

Re: [tdf-discuss] A better idea for a download package.

No doubt there are valid reasons for having an install with every available language pack included and a multitude of sound files and graphics in the gallery but I hope that someone considers the difficulty of others who have limited broadband quotas or poor connectivity. If LibreOffice is to becom

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

i think it would be great to have a HTML5 LO, which will only need a browser. The could be installed locallz or on a server. There would only be need for one version that supports the 4 major browsers. At least we should start with a ODF reader, it doesn't have to be a plugin, it can be a HTML5 ap

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO 3.3 RC 2 - Colour for insert columns and rows in Writer

At 10:45 3/01/2011, Johannes A. Bodwing wrote: it's about a table in writer and the icons to insert columns and rows. The colour now is yellow. I find it not a good choice because it's a pale kind of yellow and not good to see. What about a more saturated yellow or a kind of blue or purple or

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and vicevers a): to merge and not to waste/spread ef forts?

Il 06/01/2011 12:17, Alexander Thurgood ha scritto: Hi Carlo, Le 06/01/11 10:59, Carlo Strata a écrit : What are we waiting for?? For the NeoOffice project leaders to show an interest in collaborating ? I haven't yet seen anything on the lists from any of the Neo devs, in particular Pa

Re: [steering-discuss] FOSDEM program

Hi, Michael Meeks wrote on 2011-01-06 13.17: sorry if someone already picked this up, am only sporadically looking into my e-mails. :-) On January 10th, we need to deliver the final program for our FOSDEM DevRoom. That is fine; I'll deliver this; who do we mail it to ? thanks! Hm, g

RE: [tdf-discuss] A better idea for a download package.

I also like the download package as it currently is. I work in more than one language and it is very useful to be able to switch between languages without needing to install additional language packs. I also install Libreoffice for users with different language preferences and it's very handy to

Re: [tdf-discuss] A better idea for a download package.

Hi Christophe, *, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > At 21:03 30/11/2010, Charles Marcus wrote: >> >> (...) >> >> The current size problem as compared to OOo is because all of the >> language packs are included... and this situation is only temporary >> until storage is n

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

On Thu Jan 06 2011 02:28:26 GMT-0800 (PST) Jonathan Aquilina wrote: Shouldn't we file these wish list items somewhere and if so where? You can always create an account on the wiki and create a list. http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page there is an area called Crazy Ideas within th

Re: [tdf-discuss] A better idea for a download package.

At 21:03 30/11/2010, Charles Marcus wrote: (...) The current size problem as compared to OOo is because all of the language packs are included... and this situation is only temporary until storage is no longer an issue... After all the negative comments on the download size in this old threa

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

I 2nd your Mac comments. What i find impressive is how they work really well for those that like 3rd party apps like myself Thunderbird interfaces really nicely with the other mac apps that were mentioned below. On 1/6/11 11:47 AM, James Wilde wrote: On Jan 5, 2011, at 20:02 , BRM wrote: I t

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

When i first mentioned it its the only one i could think of as its what im using to write my response to this email. I am in no way suggesting limiting thing to just thunderbird. the more options the better as it allows users to have choices on what to work with. On 1/6/11 2:47 PM, BRM wrote:

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

On Jan 5, 2011, at 20:02 , BRM wrote: > I think such a project would have to focus really on Windows and perhaps Mac. > Most Linux systems use package management software, often vary different. > Some > (e.g. gentoo) do not have a GUI interface at all. > And honestly, the only place this is rea

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Again, why just Thunderbird? Why not work with Mozilla (Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, Lightening/Sunbird, Firefox), Opera, GNOME (Evolution, etc), KDE (KMail, KPIM, etc.) to develop interfaces that can be used to integrate any of the various email and calendaring tools out there? Especially the open s

Re: [tdf-discuss] What about NeoOff ice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts?

On 11-01-06 04:59 AM, Carlo Strata wrote: > Hi Everyone! Happy new year! > > What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and > not to waste/spread efforts? [...] What notable advantages (other than logistic) are there to use NeoOffice instead of the Mac versions of LibreOffi

[tdf-discuss] Re: What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts?

Hi Carlo, Le 06/01/11 10:59, Carlo Strata a écrit : > > What are we waiting for?? > For the NeoOffice project leaders to show an interest in collaborating ? I haven't yet seen anything on the lists from any of the Neo devs, in particular Patrick Luby. Perhaps he is just keeping himself to

[tdf-discuss] Re: [tdf-discuss] What about NeoOffice in tegration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge an d not to waste/spread efforts?

Hi Carlo Am 06.01.11 10:59, schrieb Carlo Strata: > What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and > not to waste/spread efforts? > > It's only a license trouble??? You got the point! There are two possibilities: 1. LibO changes from LGPL to GPL license. There are some g

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Shouldn't we file these wish list items somewhere and if so where? On 1/6/11 10:00 AM, Ian Lynch wrote: On 6 January 2011 06:30, Jaime R. Garza wrote: I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So that's why I think

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

On 6 January 2011 06:30, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > I believe integrating Thunderbird would be more a marketing move than > anything else, but marketing is very effective!!! So that's why I think it > would be great if Thunderbird could be integrated automatically with LO. As > I said before, a sort

[tdf-discuss] What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (a nd viceversa): to merge and not to wast e/spread efforts?

Hi Everyone! Happy new year! What about NeoOffice integration in Libò (and viceversa): to merge and not to waste/spread efforts? It's only a license trouble??? I think that XXI century FLOSS development has to change in the mean of merging efforts (in the right open project) not to spread th

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice version for Android platform

Hi, On 05/01/2011 18:09, jan...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I'm afraid to see that I can't find open office for a netbook with Android OS. On Internet, I didn't find information about a LibreOffice version for Android platform. May be someone can tell me if there is a status about this question, is th