Hi
Il 10/03/2013 01:16, Keith Curtis ha scritto:
Hi;
I'm totally with you Keith
While working on my wiki page about a new Writer toolbar, I realized
that independently of my proposal, I believe it makes sense for
LibreOffice to prefer Python. I see how LO is heading in this
direction, but
On Mar 8, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:42:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just so I'm clear: If a company wishes to contribute code
to TDF/LO, but wants their contributions to be triple-licensed
This grant does not specify any particular open-source license.
My intention is to not limit in any way the licensing of works
that my contributions are incorporated in. The license is self-
contained for that reason. There is no conflict with how
LibreOffice releases are licensed and there is
Just so I'm clear: If a company wishes to contribute code
to TDF/LO, but wants their contributions to be triple-licensed
(alv2-mpl-lgplv3), they would be refused. Is that correct?
If so, what, exactly, is the reason?
tia!
On Mar 7, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Florian Effenberger flor...@effenberger.org
How could you possibly infer from any earlier answer that
triple-licensed contributions would be inherently refused? Like Andrew
Pitonyak I read exactly the opposite.
Florian said that in the sort of theoretical argument you're
attempting, code under a triple license is just as acceptable and
On 13-03-09, at 05:39 , Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
The conversation below happened in public, but not on the OpenOffice
public lists. I believe it's good to record its outcome here on the
OpenOffice
dev list too.
Do you know why the question was asked and settled in secret
@Simon: Andrea Pescetti cross-posted to [tdf-discuss] and [openoffice-dev] some
clarifying information, but his sending from an @apache.org e-mail is
apparently hung up in a moderation queue - he has probably not subscribed with
that one. So you are seeing threads following from it that
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
In Andrea's post, the contribution page on the AOO Wiki is offered as the
Apache OpenOffice response to Jim Jagielski's question:
Thanks, Dennis - I'd pieced all that together from the posts I could
find. What
Pedro wrote
So my question is: is there any reason that LibreOffice under Windows does
not install to \LibreOffice\?
There are a few issues that make it problematic. Paramount is that the .MSI
packaging for Microsoft Installer is kind of fragile, and Andras Timar is
just one deep as primary
Hi Stuart
Thank you for your answer!
V Stuart Foote wrote
There are a few issues that make it problematic. Paramount is that the
.MSI packaging for Microsoft Installer is kind of fragile, and Andras
Timar is just one deep as primary maintainer of the multilanguage
packaging. We'd need to
On 03/10/2013 01:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
unable to get a simple answer should be proof-positive
You were given an official answer.
have also have been unable to get a clear, official answer as well.
If the code is crap, it doesn't matter what license is used, it will not
be accepted.
If
11 matches
Mail list logo
