I like Staroffice (remember that? :))
A logo could be built around a star and a series of adjacent logos
indicative of an office document type (writer, calc, impress).
Not a serious idea; just a personal opinion.
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
I don't like LibO because I don't like medial capitals (!). For me LO
to mean Liberty Office (Software).
--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
List archives are
Below is an example of how the digest mode appears using the 'reply'
e-mail function:
On 18/10/2010, discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Topics (messages 1671 through 1700):
[tdf-discuss] We're on slashdot
1671 - Per Eriksson
On 04/11/2010, discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Topics (messages 2591 through 2620):
[tdf-discuss] java / phone strategy ..
2591 - Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
[tdf-discuss] Re: Java dependency
2592 - Kohei Yoshida
Not sure what you mean by attached; in web-mail the messages when
received are inline (in the body of the message).
The number before each message is irrelevant; as I stated, all
messages do not appear in the 'reply' text box.
For comparison in digest mode behaviour, see
In terms of priorities, making LO the default for mobile (e.g.
android) is more important than windoze.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive:
LO is never going to overcome m$ products on their own platform(s).
The biggest market potential by far is mobile devices for ODF to
become the default format.
The majority of people in the world are being introduced to technology
via mobile devices; banking, money transfer, product
In consideration of the previous posts ('Re: x86_64 Windows build',
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg02649.html),
what is the mechanism that a project can be proposed to develop LO
mobile edition, get funding from Android or similar as suggested?
--
Unsubscribe
Readers,
Admittedly not using LO but the predecessor calc, recently realised
that if a spreadsheet is created using calc and saved in native ods
format, upon open using m$excel the formulas of a cell disappear to
leave only the total value? Yet if calc is used to create the same
spreadsheet and
Readers,
m$ excel allows content in cells a1, a3, a5 to be selected and copied
to a7, a9, a11. This is not possible in calc. A feature request
please.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
***
Video in HTML5 would be even better...
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be
I think this is a very interesting issue. We are moving from the dominant
technologies that were designed to put information on paper to the dominant
need of presenting information on screens. With the revolution in digital
readers this is only going to increase and then what relevance has
Subject: RE: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums - A Different Question
From: Pieter E. Zanstra pie...@zanstra.eu
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 11:35:39 +0200
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
Om the basis of the discussions going on at this list, I do share your
analysis as expressed in:
On 13/05/2011, discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Topics (messages 6130 through 6131):
[tdf-discuss] Re: Paid Developers
6130 - Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com
6131 - ??? m...@marcpare.com
When can someone improve mailing list
On 12 May 2011 17:55, Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 2011-05-11 17:01, Samuel M a écrit :
I believe, that The Document Foundation can employ Developers for
LibreOffice. I believe the community is able to get the money for that on a
monthly base.
We saw that the community was able
On 13 May 2011 21:50, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 May 2011 17:55, Marc Par=E9 m...@marcpare.com wrote:
Le 2011-05-11 17:01, Samuel M a =E9crit :
I believe, that The Document Foundation can employ Developers for
LibreOffice. I believe the community is able to get the money
Keeping OO separate from LO is a good thing overall; more actors in
the open source office software sector gives healthy competition (like
Opera and Firefox for web browsers), innovation and shows m$ users the
benefits of using a non-proprietary document format.
--
Unsubscribe instructions:
This message sent previously failed to be accepted my the mail server;
being resent in two parts. Part one of two
On 26/05/2011, e-letter inp...@gmail.com wrote:
e-letter schrieb:
A link would not show the behaviour;
Thanks for your estimation. My intention was rather to have easy access
6273 - Volker Merschmann merschm...@gmail.com
[tdf-discuss] Problematic digest mail answering - Buggy mailclient?
(was: Paid Developers)
6274 - e-letter inp...@gmail.com
[tdf-discuss] Fwd: Why TDF should be the place for one united Community
6275 - Florian Effenberger flo
A hyperlink to gnuplot was provided
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.graphics.gnuplot.user/5655) but
as originally stated, how this would help is not understood.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more:
To: discuss@documentfoundation.org
From: Harold Fuchs hwfa.libreoff...@gmail.com
Subject: [tdf-discuss] Re: Oracle contributes OOo Code to Apache Software
Foundation'sIncubator
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:30:55 +0100
Lines: 44
Message-ID: isa9ko$p1i$1...@dough.gmane.org
References:
DF programmers should join the Apache OO committee merely to be aware
of activities in this product. LO should remain separate as a full GPL
product. Presumably, if DF members become aware of feature X becoming
imminent in apache OO, they can make a proposal for a similar feature
to be
As far as the request for the ability to download individual
components of LO, this should not be enabled. The whole concept of the
predecessor staroffice product was to provide various functionalities
in terms of word-processing, spreadsheets, drawing, etc. and this
should be continued.
Those
On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
of questions seems to be with relation to using LO is some way with m$
document formats.
What should be the priority of LO development: bug-free and excellent
behaviour in native odt format, or minimising interoperability
issues
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
I might also conclude that there is NO reason to support any other file
format either. I mean, really, why should I support a non-ODF format?
PDF generation? Remove it! Any other office file format? Remove it! Why
single out
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote
I am more comfortable in OOo than I am in MSO, so, I have created many
MSO deliverables in OOo and LO. The only time that I
On 21/07/2011, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Yes, don't confuse ODF compatibility with OpenOffice.org (or LibreOffice)
compatibility. I was in the room on one occasion when Microsoft was asking
for advice on their approach to ODF 1.1 Spreadsheet documents.
Unfortunately,
On 22/07/2011, Christophe Strobbe christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be wrote:
At 02:33 21-7-2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 07/20/2011 05:02 PM, e-letter wrote:
On the users mailing list, a significant proportion of a random view
of questions seems to be with relation to using LO
On 22/07/2011, Gordon Burgess-Parker gbpli...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/07/2011 15:24, e-letter wrote:
Fine. People are/should be free to choose whichever program they
prefer. If someone likes the interface of m$o, good for them. The
point of the original post, is that priority should be for LO
On 23/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/22/2011 10:24 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote:
On 07/21/2011 08:47 AM, e-letter wrote:
On 21/07/2011, Andrew Douglas Pitonyakand...@pitonyak.org wrote
I am more
On 23/07/2011, Mark Preston m...@mpreston.demon.co.uk wrote:
Look, lets be honest about this - Microsoft has by far the largest
proportion of legacy documents out there and there is no way that
people can manage without access to those documents. Apart from
anything else, the law will require
On 27/07/2011, Fernand Vanrie s...@pmgroup.be wrote:
Andrew , Others
I agree with the point of view of Andrew.
Please make LO OPEN as maximum as possible different formats. I say
open not SAVE as...
We are a Editing House where our 30 fulltime journalists using OO
(forced by us), the
This topic has revealed the following personal observations.
People seem to want LO to be an exact clone of m$ where they can
perform the same m$ tasks, produce the same m$ output, without paying
m$. They happen to have a convenient choice in another product (LO)
that perhaps is more
On 05/08/2011, Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for top posting, writing from the smartphone. We will be improving the
statistics, but do not expect anything before the conference in Paris (where
we will make a specific presentation).
Off-topic but I think you could try k9
You can achieve these tasks using gnuplot
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
Readers,
A recent feature request prompted the strategic question: what is more
important, minimising bugs or adding new features?
Of course, the ideal answer is to do both (;)), but remember, the
question is to choose only one answer...
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
On 02/09/2011, M Robinson mr.m.robin...@gmail.com wrote:
LibreOffice 3.4.0
OOO340m1 (Build:12)
I've tried this repeatedly, when I generate lines of text, number them
(F12), delete every other line number, save in Microsoft Word 2007 XML
(*.docx) format the results are always the same
On 04/09/2011, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Hi e-letter,
e-letter wrote (04-09-11 10:31)
These typical m$ queries are irrelevant to LO. If you want to create
m$ documents, get money out of your pocket and pay for m$o. If the
expected and desired behaviour occurs with the native odt
On 04/09/2011, Mike Hall mike.h...@onepoyle.net wrote:
...
Unfortunately they aren't irrelevant. If only life were that simple.
Whether or not you have a copy of MSO, to communicate with other people
and companies it is frequently necessary to write .doc or .docx files.
Then you should buy m$o
Readers,
This question concerns how to improve management of styles between
writer and impress modules. Please read the following previous thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@global.libreoffice.org/msg10780.html
Would appreciate some guidance to make progress, in terms of how to
make a
Having become a fan of the flat xml format, this option in LO seems
most interesting and viable.
An often ignored feature of OO was the ability to create xforms (still
evident in LO? No idea). The initial question to understand is when
flat xml LO documents are most appropriate instead of the
On 13/12/2011, Harold Fuchs hwfa.gmanen...@gmail.com wrote:
Would someone please either explain or point me at a detailed explanation of
the current status of LO vis à vis the new MS office document formats
docx, xlsx etc.
Here we go again: please explain why you can't afford to buy m$???
On 07/02/2013, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
I generally advise people to send me PDFs rather than editable documents
unless there's a real need for me to edit them. That way there's no risk
anyone will get locked-in to anything :-)
If I *do* need to be able to edit I request Hybrid
43 matches
Mail list logo
