Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

Ken Springer wrote:Size of the Adobe install has been mentioned. On my Mac, Reader 10, approaches 300 MB. Personally, if the document is important to me, I find reading the printed version to be easier than on screen. And I can sit in my favorite chair, instead of in front of a computer. FYI

[tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 6/23/11 3:40 PM, Marc Paré wrote: > This thread is really about proposing, to the devs, the possibility of > creating a "LibreOffice Reader" similar to the "Adobe .pdf Reader". I'm just an LO user, not a programmer, beta tester, proof reader, I just want a reliable set of programs. I'm not

[tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 07/04/2011 04:07 PM, Robert Derman wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: >>> >>> On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: > Manfred wrote: > > "I still bel

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 05/07/11 14:34, Robert Derman wrote: Simon Cropper wrote: On 05/07/11 09:07, Robert Derman wrote: NoOp wrote: On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: Manfred wrote: "I still beli

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

Simon Cropper wrote: On 05/07/11 09:07, Robert Derman wrote: NoOp wrote: On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: Manfred wrote: "I still believe that PDF is the best solution to dis

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 05/07/11 09:07, Robert Derman wrote: NoOp wrote: On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: Manfred wrote: "I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final versions

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

NoOp wrote: On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: Manfred wrote: "I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final versions of text

[tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: > >> >> On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote: >> >> > Manfred wrote: >> > >> > "I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final >> versions >> > of text (and maybe other

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

> > Sorry to come in late on this thread, but there is an android ODF reader: >> http://www.androidzoom.com/**android_applications/** >> productivity/odf-viewer_mnhl.**html > > > It seems to have rather come to a hal

[tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

On 04/07/11 07:06, Ian Lynch wrote: On 3 July 2011 21:38, Robert Derman wrote: Ian Lynch wrote: On 2 July 2011 23:22, Robert Derman wrote Keith Curtis wrote: The problem with building a reader is that it would be about the same size as LibreOffice. OpenDocument is very different from

[tdf-discuss] Re: New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

Here is another free one (for Windows only) http://www.officeviewers.com -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/New-LibreOffice-Reader-Eliminates-Need-for-PDF-Reader-tp3101887p3102326.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe i