Hi,
> > > Maybe it has to do with your security-setings in IE. You need to allow
> > > scripts
> > > to access "secure" ActiveX-Controls, as you need for all ajax stuff.
> > > Otherwise there will of course not be any chance to get an
> > > XMLHttpRequest object.
> >
> > But that cannot be the cas
Hi,
> > Maybe it has to do with your security-setings in IE. You need to allow
> > scripts
> > to access "secure" ActiveX-Controls, as you need for all ajax stuff.
> > Otherwise there will of course not be any chance to get an XMLHttpRequest
> > object.
>
> But that cannot be the case because I te
Hi,
> I'm getting something similar in IE7 as well (FF and Opera seem fine). A
> "View Source" reveals this:
>
>
Hm, that is nothing that could have been created with jsPax. I don't use
deferred scripts and there is no "__ie_init" anywhere in jsPax as well. I'm
not shure what happens there. It
On 1/17/07, Andrea Ercolino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could you please confirm that the page you see in FF and IE both show
colored code? You'll begin to think I'm pedant, but in FF I see colored
code, no matter if I reload. On the contrary, in IE7 I can see at first
black code, and after a rel
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Maybe it has to do with your security-setings in IE. You need to allow
> scripts
> to access "secure" ActiveX-Controls, as you need for all ajax stuff.
> Otherwise there will of course not be any chance to get an XMLHttpRequest
> object.
>
But that cannot be the ca
Hi,
> > I have no problems with a relative package path
>
> This is very strange... Did you use the exact files/directories in the zip
> I submitted?
Yes, I just changed packageBase to the path at my computer. Everything else is
exactly the files in the zip.
Maybe it has to do with your securit
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> I have no problems with a relative package path
>
This is very strange... Did you use the exact files/directories in the zip I
submitted?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dynamic-loading-of-jquery.js-into-my-web-page-tf2905089.html#a8392903
S
Hi,
> > But I still have the same problem...
> > Here is a zip file. After unzipping, there will be a new "chili" folder
> > with a test page and a subfolder. It works in FF1.5.0.9 but does not in
> > IE7. http://www.nabble.com/file/5620/chili.zip chili.zip
>
> Currrently I don't have IE7 at hand -
Hi,
> Your test page works now :-)
Great :-)
> But I still have the same problem...
> Here is a zip file. After unzipping, there will be a new "chili" folder
> with a test page and a subfolder. It works in FF1.5.0.9 but does not in
> IE7. http://www.nabble.com/file/5620/chili.zip chili.zip
Cur
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> @Andrea: can you please check, if that was the problem for you?
>
Your test page works now :-)
But I still have the same problem...
Here is a zip file. After unzipping, there will be a new "chili" folder with
a test page and a subfolder. It works in FF1.5.0.9 but doe
On 1/12/07, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erm, yes. I just found that one. It was just trying to fetch the packages
from
http://jspax.cdonat.de/test/. I have changed that to /test/ now. On the
Server jspax.cdonat.de, jspax.org, jspax.de and jspax.com are the same
directory.
I know
Hi,
> >>> http://www.jspax.org/test/
> >>
> >> FF, OK.
> >> IE, KO:
> >
> > Hm, It workes for me. I'll see if I can find something strange around the
> > point, the error message suggests.
> >
> > Christof
>
> For me on IE 6 it pops up a message saying "This page is accessing
> information that is
Christof Donat wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> http://www.jspax.org/test/
>> FF, OK.
>> IE, KO:
>
> Hm, It workes for me. I'll see if I can find something strange around the
> point, the error message suggests.
>
> Christof
For me on IE 6 it pops up a message saying "This page is accessing
information tha
Hi,
> > http://www.jspax.org/test/
>
> FF, OK.
> IE, KO:
Hm, It workes for me. I'll see if I can find something strange around the
point, the error message suggests.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Christof Donat wrote:
>
>> Which testsuite? What URL?
>
> Look at
> http://www.jspax.org/test/
>
FF, OK.
IE, KO:
http://www.nabble.com/file/5605/jspax.png
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/dynamic-loading-of-jquery.js-into-my-web-page-tf2905089.html#a8296718
Sent from
Hi,
> Which testsuite? What URL?
Look at
http://www.jspax.org/test/
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Hm, that is strange. can you please check, if the testsuite at jquery.org
> works correctly with IE for you? It uses exactly the compressed package.js
> that is also available for download.
>
Which testsuite? What URL?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
Hi,
> > Just a guess: Have you tried to use an absolute URL, or at leas an
> > absolute
> > path here? Maybe Firefox interprets that relative to the current HTML
> > page and IE interprets it relative to the js. Then IE tries to
> > load "packages/packages/jquery.js" where Firefox loads
> > "packa
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Just a guess: Have you tried to use an absolute URL, or at leas an
> absolute
> path here? Maybe Firefox interprets that relative to the current HTML page
> and IE interprets it relative to the js. Then IE tries to
> load "packages/packages/jquery.js" where Firefox l
Hi,
> 2.I've wrapped the content of the standard chili.js file inside this:
> $using( 'jquery', function() {
> ...
> $package( 'chili', {} );
> } );
Since you don't load chili.js via jsPax you don't necessarily need the
$package()-call, but it doesn't hurt.
> 3.I
1. I've put this line at the bottom of the standard jquery.js file not
compressed:
$package('jquery',{});
2. I've wrapped the content of the standard chili.js file inside this:
$using( 'jquery', function() {
...
} );
3. I've changed the default p
Hi,
> >> Yes, I downloaded it short before.
> >> Please, tell me when I can download the fixed version, and I'll test
> >> again
> >
> > I just have uploaded the current version again. Please try again.
>
> I've just downloaded and tried again but... nothing changed :(
Have you tried the testsuit
Christof Donat wrote:
>
>> Yes, I downloaded it short before.
>> Please, tell me when I can download the fixed version, and I'll test
>> again
> I just have uploaded the current version again. Please try again.
>
I've just downloaded and tried again but... nothing changed :(
--
View this mes
Hi,
> Yes, I downloaded it short before.
> Please, tell me when I can download the fixed version, and I'll test again
I just have uploaded the current version again. Please try again.
Christof
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.c
Christof Donat wrote:
>
>> > Well, I don't know about any guarantees, but it works in all test I did
>> > (with
>> > the loaded script delayed, etc.)
>>
>> I'm trying to apply your jsPAX to my Chili setup, but it works in FF1.5
>> and
>> not in IE7, which does not return any error and does not s
Hi,
> > Well, I don't know about any guarantees, but it works in all test I did
> > (with
> > the loaded script delayed, etc.)
>
> I'm trying to apply your jsPAX to my Chili setup, but it works in FF1.5 and
> not in IE7, which does not return any error and does not show the page,
> just keeps load
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Well, I don't know about any guarantees, but it works in all test I did
> (with
> the loaded script delayed, etc.)
>
Hi Christof.
I'm trying to apply your jsPAX to my Chili setup, but it works in FF1.5 and
not in IE7, which does not return any error and does not sho
Hi,
> > As you might know scripts are evaluated in the
> > order they are in the HTML code, that is that script will be
> > evaluated before script2 is.
>
> Interesting - is that guaranteed even when the scripts are added
> dynamically?
Well, I don't know about any guarantees, but it works in all
> > That looks really dodgy, sorry.
> >
> > What if the browser downloads script and script2 at the
> > same time, and script2 finishes first?
>
> It doesn't. script2 is not downloaded at all, it is like a
> inline script.
Ah, I wasn't paying close enough attention to the code. :-)
> As you mi
Hi,
> That looks really dodgy, sorry.
>
> What if the browser downloads script and script2 at the same time, and
> script2 finishes first?
It doesn't. script2 is not downloaded at all, it is like a inline script. As
you might know scripts are evaluated in the order they are in the HTML code,
th
Michael Geary schrieb:
> Hmm... This would make a nice patch for jQuery itself - when it concatenates
> all the files to make the various "dist" versions, add this line to the end
> of the merged code:
>
> window.jQuery_onload && jQuery_onload();
>
> John et al, what do you think?
>
The implemen
> > I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into
> > account. Hardly a great thing, but I focus on three
> > browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
> > In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate
> > users who run Windows 2000 and Firefox, and all the
> > JS work I do is f
That's a good, workable solution!
Cheers,
Dan
Christof Donat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
>> great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then
>> IE6.
>> In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate u
Hi,
> I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
> great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
> In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate users who run
> Windows 2000 and Firefox, and all the JS work I do is for those users.
Christof,
I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate users who run Windows
2000 and Firefox, and all the JS work I do is for those users.
Hi,
>function addScript( url ) {
> var script = document.createElement( 'script' );
> script.type = 'text/javascript';
> script.charset = 'utf-8';
> script.src = url;
> document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild( script );
>};
There are safari-versi
function addScript( url ) {
var script = document.createElement( 'script' );
script.type = 'text/javascript';
script.charset = 'utf-8';
script.src = url;
document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild( script );
};
You would use it by doing something like
37 matches
Mail list logo
