On Tuesday, March 20, 2007 8:18 AM amircx said:
im trying to see some working online examples of sortable plugin and
its seems there is no such thing execept the offical website.. .why
pepole dont use it?
Do you mean this? http://interface.eyecon.ro/demos/sort.html
If so, there's not really
Hello,
I see that by default the tableSorter plugin can easily sort date+times
formatted as: Jan 01, 2000 00:00 AM. But once you take off the time
portion it sorts alphaneumerically. How can I get it to still sort
properly while just using the date portion (e.g. Jan 01, 2000)?
Thanks,
On Monday, March 19, 2007 4:03 PM Remy Sharp said:
If I were you I would write another analyser - to match your date
format, then manually add 00:00:00 before converting the time to a
numerical. Use the existing date analyser as the template.
Hope that points you in the right direction!
On Monday, March 12, 2007 1:53 PM Carl Parrish said:
http://www.flixster.com/servlet/invite/633050151ufbA633057778Btlkhlp3Cm
Am I supposed to click that?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:31 AM Arne-Kolja Bachstein said:
does anyone know under which circumstances the effects don't work
properly with IE6+7? I am trying to build some simple slideUp(slow)
effects and such, but IE6+7 on two machines seem to do this too
quickly if it doesnt even
Hello,
I've noticed that the draggable+sortable demo on the Interface site
doesn't work nearly as well as it used to. In the past I had no trouble
dropping an item into a container but now it's very finicky on where it
allows an item to be dropped and sometimes it doesn't remove the +/-
icon
Wayde,
Did you ever find anything regarding this?
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of WG
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 12:02 PM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: [jQuery] Looking for Interface.Sortables examples
Anyone got some
On Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:13 PM WG said:
No, I haven't heard from anyone regarding this ... OR the problems
with the onchange event not firing on the first re-ordering of
sortable elements.
You have anything to add?
Unfortunately no. :~(
On Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:41 AM fidoogle said:
They are not happy with the
screens showing so fast because they think the web users will not
notice the differences in the screens. They've asked me to put in
page reloads. In their minds they want the code to go back to the
server to
On Friday, December 08, 2006 3:09 AM Peter Bengtsson said:
Yes, gorgeuous but what happens if the server fails to respond? Will
the cursor be stuck on wait?
Shouldn't it though?
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On Friday, December 08, 2006 2:13 AM Barry Nauta said:
For me, the wait cursor indicates an upcoming page refresh (oldschool
web?), hence I will probably wait for this cursor to disappear before
doing anything else. The beauty of Ajax (one of) IMHO is that you can
continue to work on a
Sorry for the long email but I enjoy thinking about and tweaking
interfaces to make them easier to use so that's why I seem to just go on
and on. If you're not interested in this kind of thing or take offense
with constructive criticism then you should probably stop reading now.
:)
On Wednesday,
On Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:52 PM Brice Burgess said:
See the new example @ ;
http://dev.iceburg.net/jquery/tableEditor/example_new.php
Sweet Brice.
Here's an issue:
When I clicked one of the notepads it turned into a flat disabled
checkmark. I guess this is because some of the
On Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:28 PM Brice Burgess said:
The disabling of the save button / marking of invalid input / etc.
has to do with the validator library that gets injected during the
POST_EDIT function. This validation library needs much work (and is
not part of tableEditor -- but
On Tuesday, November 28, 2006 2:44 AM Brice Burgess said:
Does anyone find this plugin useful?
Yes definitely. Although I can't implement it just yet, I'm bookmarking
it so I can come back later.
Chris.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
On Wednesday, November 29, 2006 7:22 AM Brian Litzinger said:
I wanted to create a better to-do list that I can use in my Google
homepage, and wanted it to feel like a Google application. The design
is highly based off Gmail. I also wanted it to feel natural and easy
to use... mainly in the
On Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:11 PM Franck Marcia said:
Did you miss it? http://www.getfirebug.com
(it's not an ad, I'm just a fan)
That looks like it's going to be sweet.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:07 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
That's probably because there are none. You don't (can't?) modify the
.css file directly with js. Instead you modify
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:05 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
You can redefine css rules programatically. I've done so here...
http://blogometer.com/repository/etude/jQuery/grid/grid.html
Interesting!
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
On Monday, November 13, 2006 9:08 PM Matt Grimm said:
What would be an ideal way to refresh an image whose src attribute is
a script that dynamically generates the image? Would it be best to
store the value of the src attribute in a variable, remove the img
element from the DOM, and append a
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:14 AM ReynierPM said:
.header_b
{
display: inline;
}
So I need to change it to block in IE. Can any help me with this?
Cheers and thanks in advance
Within CSS you can do the following to apply styles to IE only. (This
hack may be fixed in IE7 not
Although this would be great for the programmer I think
this would be horrible for the user experience. That's not how a user would
expect to interact with a form. You could "solve" that problem with giving them
an explanation about your form... but then you're giving them more things to
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:35 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Most browsers don't focus a field from
a link pointing to the field's id, so I usually add a click event to
explicitly focus the form element. The field to focus is simply read
from the link's href...
Unless I'm misunderstanding your
ad phrases and words, but not sentences. As Don
Norman (Godfather of Design) says, "A door that -requires- a sign that says
[Pull] is a porrly designed door".
I hope this is helpful.
Glen
On 11/14/06, Chris W.
Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:35 AM Klaus Hartl said
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:33 AM Karl Swedberg said:
I think the preferred method for targeting a browser for certain
style rules is to include your main stylesheet first in the head
element and then use conditional comments to include browser-specific
stylesheets.
[snip]
Thanks for
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:33 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Hi Chris,
Hi Klaus,
I wonder how browser behave
when the field is out of the borders of the viewport... will they
scroll down? Not sure...
That is the behavior I have always experienced. Though I should say I
don't do any testing in
Glen,
How did you implement the three different sites for
Intuit.com on the server side? I'd really be interested in
knowing.
Thanks,Chris.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen
LipkaSent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 9:58 AMTo: jQuery
Discussion.Subject:
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am SO glad to see someone else mention this. In my mind, users who
do not have Javascript enabled in this day and age fall are missing
out on a LOT the Web has to offer. And why? Most often, because
someone has filled their
3. Sure. We make a lot of assumptions when building
websites. But the important thing about those assumptions is when things go
wrong how will it affect the user? Someone has a black white screen? Well
they wouldn't see the colors anyway. Not a BIG deal. They know they're monitor
doesn't
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 12:17 PM John Resig said:
I know that Joern already has some event code, ready to be committed -
and I have the non-destructive jQuery code ready to go. Brandon
mentioned that he wants to rewrite the jQuery.attr() in time for
release too.
I hope one feature he
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 1:10 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Based on some other replies, I guess I wasn't clear in my
statement(s). I'm not advocating depending on Javascript, not at all.
However, I don't think we should do away with the bells and whistles
(read: enhancements) that it
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:48 PM Klaus Hartl said:
body {
background: url(/log.jsp);
}
Hm, not sure how to put that in relation to the non CSS users.
Those that do make the request have CSS. Those that don't, don't?
Chris.
___
On Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:17 PM Klaus Hartl said:
Yeah, but how do you tie the css request to the page request?
Err, it's getting late, I have to sleep (shutdown...)
Analytics falls in the category of dark arts in my opinion so here is my
idea:
Your .css files can be run through your
I'd hardly say that anyone can have a coma "removed".
Usually they just get better and wake up.
(Just having a little fun. Please
continue!)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam
SherlockSent: Friday, November 10, 2006 10:30 PMTo: jQuery
Discussion.Subject:
On Friday, November 10, 2006 1:20 PM Jörn Zaefferer said:
Hi jQueryians,
Hi!
Please post your opinions and ideas, I'm sure there are many.
I'd like to it default to Category view rather than Alphabetical.
Thanks,
Chris.
___
jQuery mailing list
On Friday, November 10, 2006 3:41 AM Christian Bach said:
This is way cool!
Yes it is.
Have you done any tests with this plugin and tablesorter?
I'm pleased to report that it worked for me without any problems along
side TableSorter. Happy day!
I just included the quicksort js file and
On Thursday, November 09, 2006 12:14 PM Jörn Zaefferer said:
There is quite a lot of stuff on your page. It would be a great help
if you could reduce the code we have to check to find the problem.
Which page are you referring to? custom.js? index.php? One of my ajax php
pages?
Chris.
On Thursday, November 09, 2006 1:49 PM Jörn Zaefferer said:
Just the complete application. It's way to much stuff to look through
all of it to find the problem you mentioned. I'm willing to help, but
please understand that you can help, too :-)
Although I haven't removed anything (well, I've
On Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:17 PM said:
jQuery.fn.debug = function(message) {
return this.log('debug:' + (message || '')
+[).each(function(){$.log(this);}).log(]);
};
jQuery.fn.log = jQuery.log = function(message) {
if(window.console)
On Thursday, November 09, 2006 3:06 PM Mike Alsup said:
His script adds debug and log to the jQuery object so you can use
it like:
$('a').debug(anchors);
I see thanks!
Chris.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
Hello,
I've got a loading animation that appears each time a request is made
through AJAX but I'm thinking about getting rid of it altogether because
the loading happens so quickly. The animation is actually just kind of
annoying.
But I was thinking that instead of getting rid of it entirely I
On Wednesday, November 08, 2006 10:44 AM Mark Gibson said:
This may work (untested):
[snip]
ajaxStart delays the animation by 2 seconds using setTimeout,
and ajaxStop cancels the timeout function (if it hasn't already
been trigger) and stops the anim.
It sort of works!
Now it won't show
// animation is still
hidden, so we don't need to hide it
again if(this.style.display !=
"none") {
$(this).hide();
} });
On 11/8/06, Chris W.
Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,I've
got a loading animation that appears each time a request is madethrough
AJAX but I'm thi
On Wednesday, November 08, 2006 4:10 PM Mike Alsup said:
I've just posted some convenience plugins for dealing with Quicktime,
Flash, and mp3 media.
Source and demos can be found here: http://malsup.com/jquery/media/
Cool!
___
jQuery mailing list
I don't know for sure but IE 5.0 is a dinosaur of a browser
so I would assume that it is not totally supported. IE 5.5 (and beyond) is
considered a "modern" browser.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ?Sent:
Sunday, November 05, 2006 10:45 AMTo:
On Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:06 AM Klaus Hartl said:
Chris W. Parker schrieb:
IE 5.5 (and beyond) is considered a modern browser.
Haha, hey Chris, regarding Web Standards, DOM/JavaScript etc. support
I wouldn't even call IE 7 a modern browser...
Well, I did put it in quotes
On Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:11 AM Christof Donat said:
To do that you at least need to define a point in time when these
attributes will be changed during the Animation - I'd suggest in the
middle.
Or you could go crazy and layer an identical element over the top of the
original one and
The problem is the issue of maintenance (among others...?).
When someone updates their plugin you have to download the new one, find the
plugin code in the jquery.js file, delete the old code from the jquery file and
then insert the new code. But if you include an external file you simply
On Friday, November 03, 2006 9:50 AM Muckinger said:
I want to use events with jquery and tried the example:
[snip]
script type=text/javascript
// ![CDATA[
$(p).click( function() { alert(Hello); } );
// ]]
/script
[snip]
But nothing happens, also with the other
Hello,
Considering the following two statements:
1:
$(div#one).load('numbers.php', {page: thisPage});
2:
$.get('numbers.php', {page: thisPage}, function(fileInput) {
$(div#one).html(fileInput);
});
Why does #2 work and #1 doesn't?
As far as I know I'm using #1 correctly. The problem
On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:57 PM Chris W. Parker said:
1:
$(div#one).load('numbers.php', {page: thisPage});
2:
$.get('numbers.php', {page: thisPage}, function(fileInput) {
$(div#one).html(fileInput);
});
Why does #2 work and #1 doesn't?
I found out why. Apparently I
On Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:11 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What are the three places where we should look for docs?
Well there's:
1. Visual jQuery http://www.visualjquery.com *
2. API Documentation http://jquery.com/api/ *
3. The third place are the wiki pages that can be found on the
On Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:59 AM Klaus Hartl said:
See here for a demo with these things fixed:
http://stilbuero.de/demo/query.html?foo=bar
404
Chris.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hello,
Is there a jQuery function to enumerate the key/value pairs in a
querystring? I wasn't able to find one with the Visual jQuery website
and instead of reinventing the wheel I thought I'd query the list.
Thanks,
Chris.
___
jQuery mailing list
On Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:46 AM Luke Lutman said:
Have a look at this recent thread :-)
http://www.nabble.com/method-plugin-for-getting-query-string-vars--tf248
1232.html#a6919130
I read through this and tried to implement your first suggestion but I
notice that everything takes
Hello,
I'm just beginning
to play with jQuery and as well I'm a novice with js.
I'm just doing some
VERY simple tests right now and I ran into some unexpected
behavior.
The following HTML
will render on the same line in your browser:
a class="one"
href="".../a
a class="two"
f you want to
avoid that effect, you can apply a callback that converts back to
inline.$(expr).fadeIn(500, function() { $(this).css("display", "inline")
}) -- Yehuda
On 10/30/06, Chris W.
Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm just beginning to play with jQue
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:18 PMTo: jQuery
Discussion.Subject: Re: [jQuery] fadeIn() causes change in page
layout
You could try setting the element to opacity 0, then make it inline,
then fade it in. Might work.-- Yehuda
On 10/30/06, Chris W.
Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This wor
the element to opacity 0, then make it inline,
then fade it in. Might work.-- Yehuda
On 10/30/06, Chris W.
Parker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This works
except that it has the unfortunate effect of moving things after they've
faded. Which makes complete sense but is almost useless since
59 matches
Mail list logo
