Re: [IxDA Discuss] Where are all the designers?

2008-03-08 Thread pete
I love and hate this thread.

There have been many great points made about the tradeoffs of working
in a vibrant area, about what interactive design is, and how horrible
it can be to find the right job.  But as I read this thread it pains
me.

I%u2019m a recent graduate of a European design school and I%u2019m
currently looking for employment.  I am that young kid who would
gladly live in a cardboard box to be out in the valley and working on
exciting projects, yet so far there%u2019s only been rejections and
glimpses of future contractor work.  So it%u2019s quite hard to see
the disconnect.

I%u2019d like to offer up one observation.  Just as the IxD community
has had trouble defining Interactive Design, my school had difficulty
choosing the types of projects to develop throughout the program. 
Since the field is so varied, we touched upon many types of
interactive design projects while never delving too deep into the
technical aspects of each category.  Instead an overall emphasis on
theory, process, and the artistic elements of interactive design were
stressed as those elements can be applied to any possible future
project.  While, I believe, this was an apt way to instruct the
program at this current point in time, it has left us students with a
lagging technical skill set.  The backgrounds of the student body were
as diverse as one could imagine and therefore students as still able
to only apply for positions similar to their previous backgrounds.  
As I currently browse jobs, many jobs emphasize simply the web nature
of interactive design and therefore the only students from my school
who would fit into the mold that HR builds are those who already had
a background in web development and programming.  Perhaps this is
another element to think about.  There are schools attempting to
teach the discipline, but until the categories are defined further,
it will be hard to train students on a highly technical level.  I
would like to see companies start to give a little and realize
something along the lines of what Andrei said where interactive
designers do not code and also work along side of graphic designers. 
So far it seems that this mentality would surely lead to a rejection
email.

Also, in general, I am saddened to see that the areas of experience
design, environmental design, and installation design are less
prevalent in the United States than over in Europe.  In my mind this
is quite ironic, because as usual, the funding for substantial and
innovative projects could easily be found stateside.  Also, I would
say that a fair amount of my classmates prefer these areas as opposed
to UI/IA design.

But if anyone has suggestions for the unemployed side of this debate,
please send them over.  I agree that it would be nice to have a simple
and secure resume posting system on here.I don%u2019t believe
I%u2019m the only inactive designer around here.



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=26170



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] iPhone SDK

2008-03-08 Thread Michael Tuminello
buying a cross-platform development framework does not automatically  
make you know how to build good software, unfortunately for Nokia.   
They were not particularly good at it using Symbian. I don't see how  
this acquisition changes that.   My Nokia N76 (which I like) has a  
HORRIBLE music interface.  Browsing and playing are quite obviously 2  
separate applications.

For an idea of just how bad it is, just from an organizational  
standpoint, here's a look on my mostly abandoned blog:

http://notes.motiontek.com/?p=29

this can easily be replicated in its full badness with QT.  Hopefully  
will not, but I think the underlying UI framework is the least of  
their worries.

MT


On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Pankaj Chawla wrote:

 BlackBerry is dead. Microsoft is dead. Windows Mobile is dead. Amazon
 is dead. Kindle is dead. Nokia is dead. Motorola was already dead but
 now they are even more dead. Google's Android is dead. Samsung is
 dead. LG is dead. Sony is dead. UTStarcom is dead.

 I dont know about others but Nokia sure aint dead. It recently bought
 a company called Trolltech that makes C++ toolkit by the names of Qt
 for desktops and Qtopia for the mobile world. Its a proven technology
 and extensively used for a decade now and what makes it beautiful is
 that your application code is same for Windows, Unix and Mac (Yes, Qt
 is available on Mac also). To top it all it also has the same toolkit
 targetted for Java by the name QT Jambi. It comes with thousands
 of programmers who have been programming using it for a decade and
 since the toolkit scales from mobiles to desktops seamlessly and from
 Windows to Mac to Linux also seamlessely, its one power weapon that
 Nokia just acquired. It just needs to be seen how Nokia uses this to
 combat Iphone API and Google Android but if I as a developer have to
 bet my money I will surely put a large bet on Nokia-Trolltech combine
 though I wont ignore Iphone API and Android totally :). Nokia through
 Trolltech also gets onto the LiMo (Linux Mobile) platform and I wont
 be surprised if symbian gives way to LiMo-Qt combination in future
 Nokia devices and that sure will be one hell of a platform to beat :-)

 Cheers
 Pankaj
 
 Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
 To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
 List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
 List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] iPhone SDK

2008-03-08 Thread mark schraad
While the assessment Dave makes is a little strong (I might go with  
very sick, not dead) he is exactly right. But Pankaj, this has very  
little to do with coding and languages. This has to do with one of  
the most adept market assessments and most elegant strategic moves we  
have seen. talk all you want about Apples superior style, technology  
and cool factor, but this move into mobile hardware is brilliant.

Apples sniffed out an industry that was divided into two  
disfunctional factions. The carriers, who are making the exact same  
strategic mistakes they made as long distance providers 20 years ago,  
and hardware manufacturers - also repeating old mistakes. The  
carriers are still caught up in creating barriers for consumers to  
maximize profit. Hand set makers are driving with technology first,  
the user second.

The iPhone is fundamentally changing the functional, developmental,  
and the business landscape of the mobile phone industry. This is a  
fast and remarkably transparent market take over. If you have any  
aspirations of being an entrepreneur you should be following this  
very closely. It is a lesson in how to own an market. Lastly, and  
likely most importantly, pay attention, these kind of changes in the  
market always present large opportunities for folks like us.

Mark


On Mar 8, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Pankaj Chawla wrote:

 BlackBerry is dead. Microsoft is dead. Windows Mobile is dead. Amazon
 is dead. Kindle is dead. Nokia is dead. Motorola was already dead but
 now they are even more dead. Google's Android is dead. Samsung is
 dead. LG is dead. Sony is dead. UTStarcom is dead.

 I dont know about others but Nokia sure aint dead. It recently bought
 a company called Trolltech that makes C++ toolkit by the names of Qt
 for desktops and Qtopia for the mobile world. Its a proven technology
 and extensively used for a decade now and what makes it beautiful is
 that your application code is same for Windows, Unix and Mac (Yes, Qt
 is available on Mac also). To top it all it also has the same toolkit
 targetted for Java by the name QT Jambi. It comes with thousands
 of programmers who have been programming using it for a decade and
 since the toolkit scales from mobiles to desktops seamlessly and from
 Windows to Mac to Linux also seamlessely, its one power weapon that
 Nokia just acquired. It just needs to be seen how Nokia uses this to
 combat Iphone API and Google Android but if I as a developer have to
 bet my money I will surely put a large bet on Nokia-Trolltech combine
 though I wont ignore Iphone API and Android totally :). Nokia through
 Trolltech also gets onto the LiMo (Linux Mobile) platform and I wont
 be surprised if symbian gives way to LiMo-Qt combination in future
 Nokia devices and that sure will be one hell of a platform to beat :-)

 Cheers
 Pankaj
 
 Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
 To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
 List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
 List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Security on the web: how far do we go?

2008-03-08 Thread Gloria Petron
David Platt devotes Chapters 3  4 of his book, *Why Software Sucks...And
What You Can Do About
It*http://www.amazon.com/Why-Software-Sucks-What-About/dp/0321466756/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1204999335sr=1-1,
to this very issue. His quote: The No.1 threat of security isn't the packet
sniffer...it's the Post-it Note.
His proposed solution: single sign-on, managed through a reputable and
trusted third party, such as a credit card company or bank (similar to
Stephanie's solution).
Microsoft tried the same thing with Passport awhile back, but it flopped
because no one wanted their personal info being managed by Microsoft.

He also recommends this book, which he claims will scare you so bad you
won't be able to sleep for weeks afterwards. Sicko that I am, I can't wait
to check it out.
Kevin Mitnick, *The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of
Security*http://www.amazon.com/Art-Deception-Controlling-Element-Security/dp/076454280X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1204999227sr=8-1(Wiley,
2002).

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] iPhone SDK

2008-03-08 Thread Pankaj Chawla
Hi Michael,

On 3/8/08, Michael Tuminello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 buying a cross-platform development framework does not automatically
 make you know how to build good software, unfortunately for Nokia.
 They were not particularly good at it using Symbian. I don't see how
 this acquisition changes that.   My Nokia N76 (which I like) has a
 HORRIBLE music interface.  Browsing and playing are quite obviously 2
 separate applications.

 this can easily be replicated in its full badness with QT.  Hopefully
 will not, but I think the underlying UI framework is the least of
 their worries.


I 110% agree with you. The only point I was trying to make was that
symbian was a failed development platform. More than the API whats
needed is a good development platform and I think Qt+LiMO will provide
a very powerful development platform. Having fixed that end Nokia can
focus on the interaction design part of the process and if they can get
that right they have a winner. Apple on the other hand have done beautiful
work in the interaction design of Iphone and now it is exposing the API
for Iphone but ultimately the new applications will need to be developed
and to my mind Objective C is the weak link in Apple's armour. I havent
downloaded the SDK yet so I am not sure if any other development
language is supported but if its Objective C only then I will be a lot
worried.

Cheers
Pankaj

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Design Deliverables and Developers

2008-03-08 Thread Gloria Petron
I'm an in-house designer who sits on the same floor as the development team,
doing a lot of enterprise system work. It's good to find that groove that
works with your developers (for us, nothing gets results like a clickable
HTML/CSS prototype, accompanied by an MSWord doc with screenshots of the
different error screens...all meticulously dated so no one accidentally
designs to the wrong version), but be warned: sometimes you can get so
wrapped up in how you  the developers communicate that you forget your end
user. In the past, if an interface needed a fix, because I wanted to keep
confrontations to a minimum I would unconsciously design a solution that
stayed within the programmers' comfort zone. (This happened during a project
last year, and the end users spanked me for it.) Looking back I know now
there were times when - for a truly usable solution - I should have been
more of a hard-ass.

This isn't necessarily true for other settings, but for large-scale
enterprise apps, I would venture that the quality of the deliverables you
give to your developers is informed by the quality of the deliverables you
have with your end users. If all you've got are a couple hour's worth of
user interviews (which often turn into rant sessions and pie-in-the-sky wish
lists) and some Photoshop mockups, it won't matter how well you communicate
with the developers, you're not going to get the biggest bang for your buck.
I think every company has its own thing that works for them, discovered by
trial and error. But now that I've figured out how to communicate with my
development team, I'm more free to focus on creating research deliverables
that...(wait for it) feed into the deliverables that go to the development
team.

-G

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] iPhone SDK

2008-03-08 Thread dave malouf
First off, those weren't my words.
Second off, Jeez! doesn't anyone have a sense of hyperbole any more?

Of course Nokia and Blackberry are far from Dead, and I would even
say they aren't all that sick either. What they aren't is prepared
for the current war. I would argue though that BB has a better chance
against iPhone (or more accurately is better protected against an
iPhone assault) than Nokia is.

Samsung  Motorola ... Let's just say ... maybe not so much a
hyperbole. ;)

-- dave



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=26885



Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] iPhone SDK

2008-03-08 Thread mark schraad
Sorry Dave, apparently I misread your intro...

I spent a few hours this afternoon trying to find an introductory  
product that penetrated a 10+ year old market with the same sort of  
numbers as the iPhone. I can neither find or think of one.


On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:42 PM, dave malouf wrote:

 First off, those weren't my words.
 Second off, Jeez! doesn't anyone have a sense of hyperbole any more?

 Of course Nokia and Blackberry are far from Dead, and I would even
 say they aren't all that sick either. What they aren't is prepared
 for the current war. I would argue though that BB has a better chance
 against iPhone (or more accurately is better protected against an
 iPhone assault) than Nokia is.

 Samsung  Motorola ... Let's just say ... maybe not so much a
 hyperbole. ;)

 -- dave



 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
 Posted from the new ixda.org
 http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=26885


 
 Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
 To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
 List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
 List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


[IxDA Discuss] Nice NY Times article on interface design changes

2008-03-08 Thread David Malouf
Hi Gang,

I thought people might be interested in this NY Times article on interface
design. It actually made the front page under technology.
http://tinyurl.com/2ph443

-- dave

-- 
David Malouf
http://synapticburn.com/
http://ixda.org/
http://motorola.com/

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help


Re: [IxDA Discuss] Security on the web: how far do we go?

2008-03-08 Thread Michael Micheletti
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Gloria Petron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 David Platt devotes Chapters 3  4 of his book, *Why Software Sucks...And
 What You Can Do About
 It*
 http://www.amazon.com/Why-Software-Sucks-What-About/dp/0321466756/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1204999335sr=1-1
 ,
 to this very issue. His quote: The No.1 threat of security isn't the
 packet
 sniffer...it's the Post-it Note.

 ...

 Kevin Mitnick, *The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of
 Security*
 http://www.amazon.com/Art-Deception-Controlling-Element-Security/dp/076454280X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1204999227sr=8-1
 (Wiley,
 2002).


Another for your book list: Corporate Espionage by Ira Winkler
http://www.amazon.com/Corporate-Espionage-Happening-Company-About/dp/0761508406/
Former NSA computer security spook (hi guys, hope you get this message, tell
Verizon I'll pay my bill soon, OK? :-) delivers case studies that read like
spy stories. My favorite was the Japanese Documentary Film Crew caper.

His recommendation for the most effective thing a company can do to promote
security: a company-wide security awareness program. The weak point of most
of the cases discussed in the book are the humans in the system; a security
education awareness program helps them make better decisions.

Michael Micheletti

Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe  http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines  http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .. http://www.ixda.org/help