Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [Odlparent-dev] Adopting maven-3.5.x as a build requirement

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Robert Varga wrote: > maven-3.5 is being shipped in Fedora 27 and will ship in Ubuntu 18.04 > LTS. I have not done any research beyond that, but as Michael recently > noted, managing these sorts of dependencies can be done via > http://sdkman.io/ or

[OpenDaylight Discuss] Adopting maven-3.5.x as a build requirement

Hello everyone, recent issues encountered and our general historical use of everything latest-and-greatest, we need to discuss timing of making maven-3.5 required for building OpenDaylight. We currently support and verify maven-3.3.9, which is used for all of our jobs except those running on

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [infrautils-dev] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

Sam, my POV is that most of typical "functional" config actually should be YANG in DS, clustered and what not. I prefer defaults in code not in BP XML, just because it means (component) tests wired with Guice instead of BP pick them up as well, but that is a minor point. There are exceptions to

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Tom Pantelis > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Sam Hague wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Tom Pantelis wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote: >> >>> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > You could always use Blueprint with Config Management; you're able to > set default values in BP, than override via config file. > > ex: > > http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0; >

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

You could always use Blueprint with Config Management; you're able to set default values in BP, than override via config file. ex: http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0; xmlns:cm="http://aries.apache.org/blueprint/xmlns/blueprint-cm/v1.1.0;>

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > >> What is the preferred or suggested best practice for service level >> configuration? There are two methods we have been using and would like to >>

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] configuration options: blueprint xml or cfg's?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Sam Hague wrote: > What is the preferred or suggested best practice for service level > configuration? There are two methods we have been using and would like to > know the pros and cons of each. Genius and NetVirt went with the blueprint > xmls

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Multiple Controller implementation

Jamo, Thank you alot i’ll try docker as mentioned by Luis :) From: Jamo Luhrsen Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 7:16:28 AM To: Mohamed Abdel Metaal; Luis Gomez Cc: discuss@lists.opendaylight.org; openflowplugin-dev Subject: Re: [OpenDaylight