gt; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Doyle
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
>
>
> On Jul 26, 2007, at 18:08 , Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
>
> > Sean has a good point: so
Gillies
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:24 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Michael,
Standards bodies are a good thing if they produce good standards.
OGC standards tend toward fussy intricacy (compare WFS-T to the Atom
Publishing Proto
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Gillies
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:24 AM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
>
> Michael,
>
> Standards bodies are a good thing if they produce
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen
Ticheler
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical Committee (OG
rom OGC.
(Feel free to send me any comments/positions you'd like me to put forward.)
-mpg
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen
Ticheler
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
Not all of us are interested in standards development, just as not all of us
are interested in FundRaising or Metadata or... I'd much prefer to keep the
main list for announcements and general topics, not specific threads.
P Kishor wrote:,
Might I ask, what w
dear all,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:17:38AM -0400, P Kishor wrote:
> Might I ask, what will a separate list accomplish that posting on just
> the main OSGeo list won't? Standards are a sufficiently important
> subject that all should be concerned with it, and definitely
> knowledgeable about.
At
L PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Landon Blake
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 8:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
>
> What if we kept the standards discussion on this general
> maili
, July 19, 2007 7:18 AM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Lorenzo,
Might I ask, what will a separate list accomplish that posting on just
the main OSGeo list won't? Standards are a sufficiently important
subject that all should be concerned wit
Lorenzo,
Might I ask, what will a separate list accomplish that posting on just
the main OSGeo list won't? Standards are a sufficiently important
subject that all should be concerned with it, and definitely
knowledgeable about.
Managing all these separate lists is becoming a pain in the derrière
I agree on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (this list will be spammed even before
starting... )
should we proceed creating the list?
does anyone disagree?
ciao
Lorenzo
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
I'd not go so far as to create a list yet -- I'm not sure we know what
we're all lookin
Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
I'd not go so far as to create a list yet -- I'm not sure we know what
we're all looking for at this point.
For example: do we really want "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", or perhaps more generally
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? To my mind, these are two related-but-different,
and equally-in
,
and equally-interesting, ideas to explore...
-mpg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Becchi
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 2:15 AM
> To: OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec
I guess this thread is pretty hot, there are many sub-threads and maybe
a good solution could be to set up a mailing list, for the beginning,
as: ogc AT osgeo.org
Trying to be practical I can offer myself to administer the list as I'm
doing with the Spanish Chapter and the Spanish GIS Book.
Th
Landon Blake wrote:
It appears that some of my concerns about problems with OGC membership
remain in place. I'm disappointed to learn that non-members are no
longer allowed to join in the discussion.
The individual membership option also presents challenges for some open
source developers
I i
TECTED] On Behalf Of Raj Singh
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 1:28 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
But there is now officially an individual membership category. Info
isn't up on the web site yet, but I think its $400/year. You can
qualify
But there is now officially an individual membership category. Info
isn't up on the web site yet, but I think its $400/year. You can
qualify if no one else (such as a full-time employer) has legal
rights to all your work.
---
Raj
On Jul 17, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
That's not
That's not an option any more, only members and prospective members may
attend TC henceforth.
Ian Turton wrote:
You could also just attend the meetings as a non-member as Paul Ramsey
does sometimes, or just ask some of us who do go to meetings to make
your points for you.
--
Paul Ramsey
On 7/17/07, Landon Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One of my biggest problems with the OGC is the lack of a practical
membership avenue for open source projects and/or programmers. I think it
would be great if the OSGeo or some of its participating projects could
serve as a vehicle that woul
community in OGC
standard development.
The Sunburned Surveyor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen Ticheler
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Hi Lorenzo,
On 17 Jul 2007, at 1:09 PM, Lorenzo Becchi wrote:
Jeroen, all, very important thread to me too.
generic questions:
- what would it mean to create an OGC Committee?
A place where those involved / interested in OGC spec development
connect with each other and where OSGEO interest
Jeroen, all, very important thread to me too.
generic questions:
- what would it mean to create an OGC Committee?
- is it an overhead for the board?
- will there be a board member to support this Commitee? is this needed?
- does it mean to subscribe as OSGeo to OGC? how much does it cost?
I thin
Thanks for the update Jeroen - going to add one more to your list...
Jeroen Ticheler wrote:
With this email I would like to touch upon two issues that I think are
relevant to OSGEO. I hope bringing this up can trigger some discussion
on how OSGEO would best benefit from the OGC spec development
ns
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical
Committee (OGC-TC) meeting in Paris.
For those not to familiar with this meeting, it consists of a
series of Working Group (WG) meetings that mostly run around the
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeroen
Ticheler
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:12 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGEO & OGC spec development
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium
Hi all,
Last week I attended the Open Geospatial Consortium Technical
Committee (OGC-TC) meeting in Paris.
For those not to familiar with this meeting, it consists of a series
of Working Group (WG) meetings that mostly run around the development
of specifications (or standards if you wish)
26 matches
Mail list logo
