Hi,
This is an update to my previous message about using Nabble.
I asked Nabble to clarify some behaviour regarding some of the archives
we host at at Nabble. I've got it answered, so I updated the Nabble section:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#Nabble
M
On 13 July 2012 19:44, Mateusz
Hi,
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind of elevator pitch?
[1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Member_Nominations_2012
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind of elevator
pitch?
[1]
On 07/27/2012 10:06 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind of elevator
pitch?
[1]
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:08:21 -0400
Mark Lucas mluca...@mac.com wrote:
I would like to second the nomination for Daniel. After having had
the pleasure of working with him on the current board, I frankly
can't imagine how we would function without him. He is always a
voice of reason and he
On 27 July 2012 10:32, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote:
On 07/27/2012 10:06 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Can someone explain me what is this Seconded by
and Support by feature listed next to the Board nominations [1]?
Is this an element of any formal procedure or it's some kind of
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and
I'm also sure many of us can name firms that have no issue shipping LGPL
Il 27/07/2012 12:45, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto:
GPL is dying, of natural causes.
http://ostatic.com/blog/the-top-licenses-on-github Best regards,
is this true only on GH, or is it a general phenomenon?
--
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Il 27/07/2012 12:45, Mateusz Loskot ha scritto:
GPL is dying, of natural causes.
http://ostatic.com/blog/the-top-licenses-on-github Best regards,
is this true only on GH, or is it a general phenomenon?
Well, if you do a quick search for GPL on github,
On 27 July 2012 11:47, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a
Hi all,
We would like to nominate Anne Ghisla (from Italy) to the Board of
Directors.
Anne is very active within the OSGeo community. Among others, We would like
to mention some of her activities:
- OSGeo Google Summer of Code administrator in 2011 and 2012;
- Member of Italian chapter
On 07/27/2012 12:55 AM, Alex Mandel wrote:
3.You can also re-license the finished product under a commercial
license of your choice this seems to be the biggest difference with
LGPL. But there's also another big difference, and EPL program is
incompatible with all other OS licenses
On 07/27/2012 05:43 AM, Anne Ghisla wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:08:21 -0400
Mark Lucas mluca...@mac.com wrote:
I would like to second the nomination for Daniel. After having had
the pleasure of working with him on the current board, I frankly
can't imagine how we would function without him.
On Jul 27, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Andrew Ross andrew.r...@eclipse.org wrote:
BSD, MIT, Apache wouldn't have this issue - at the expense of not having the
weak copyleft. Basically people can take the code and do what they wish with
it.
+1
--
Puneet Kishor
FYI: I release all of the code for my projects under the GPL and LGPL,
and have no plans on switching for my projects. So the licenses aren't
dead quite yet. :]
I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between the
greater adoption that comes with a weaker license, and the stricter
On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and
I'm also sure many of us can name
Nobody has expressed interest in GeoTools and we are very happy where
we are with LGPL as a biz friendly license.
uDig is attempting an out reach to the Eclipse foundation, both as a
source of developer trained up in the Eclipse RCP framework which use
as our plugin system, and as we are
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote:
On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Landon Blake sunburned.surve...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between the
greater adoption that comes with a weaker license, and the stricter
adherence to open source principles that come with a stronger
license.
On 27 July 2012 15:50, Mr. Puneet Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Landon Blake sunburned.surve...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between the
greater adoption that comes with a weaker license, and the stricter
On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Ian Turton ijtur...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 July 2012 15:50, Mr. Puneet Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Landon Blake sunburned.surve...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think there is a tradeoff in the licensing decision between the
I hesitate to get into this discussion, but...
Puneet wrote:
[...] I short-circuit all license discussions in my personal domain by
not having any license. Life is too short and precious, in my view, to
encumber with
these complications.
Do you literally mean no license at all? That might
On 27 July 2012 15:27, Seven (aka Arnulf) se...@arnulf.us wrote:
On 07/27/2012 11:45 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 27 July 2012 05:55, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance
On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Michael P. Gerlek m...@flaxen.com wrote:
I hesitate to get into this discussion, but...
Puneet wrote:
[...] I short-circuit all license discussions in my personal domain by
not having any license. Life is too short and precious, in my view, to
encumber with
I would have to echo that. I do not see using code at work that does not
have any licensing information attached.
Doug
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov
On 12-07-27 3:09 PM, Adrian Custer wrote:
[2] I personally find the failure to make Martin a charter member as one
glaring indictment of OSGeo and its community, revealing the inwards
looking favoritism and lack of exploration beyond. There are few people
as passionate, knowledgeable, or
On Jul 27, 2012, at 2:39 PM, doug_newc...@fws.gov wrote:
I would have to echo that. I do not see using code at work that does not
have any licensing information attached.
Agreed.
--
Puneet Kishor
___
Discuss mailing list
On 07/27/2012 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer wrote:
Third, the decision strikes me as between honoring the intent of
contributors to Geotools 2.6 and honoring the desire of the Geotoolkit
contributors to take forwards their code base and build a community
after having been rejected by OSGeo.
Landon,
For what it's worth...
I eagerly read that link you provided. It represents one end of the
spectrum for values and principles in terms of open source. I believe
it's fair to say that end of the spectrum is fairly staunch and
recognized by some as radical and even marginalizing.
I
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Adrian Custer acus...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
On 7/27/12 12:55 AM, Alex Mandel wrote:
This is a really interesting debate. Reading the links provided it also
appears to be a mixed bag about acceptance of LGPL of various firms and
I'm also sure
As someone who has done several for-pay projects (both big and small) to
combine proprietary and foss4g code, I can give a summary from a set of
anecdotal evidence and trends that I have noticed from a US-based consultant
point of view.
From my experience, the adoption of an open source project
On 2012/07/27 21:56, Margherita Di Leo wrote:
Hi all,
We would like to nominate Anne Ghisla (from Italy) to the Board of
Directors.
Great to see Anne as a nominee and also that nomination has been made on
behalf of the very active Italian Local Chapter.
I strongly support Anne's candidature.
On 27 July 2012 18:43, Markus Neteler nete...@osgeo.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Andrew Ross andrew.r...@eclipse.org
wrote:
...
A project can decide what makes the most sense for them.
Note that for long-term projects a license change
is rather difficult to realize
Ragi,
Thank you very much for sharing your experience.
You've saved me a lot of time
--
Mateusz Loskot
(Sent from phone, apology for any top-posting or broken quoting)
On 27 Jul 2012 21:11, rburhum r...@burhum.com wrote:
As someone who has done several for-pay projects (both big and small) to
34 matches
Mail list logo
