nope, alle mp3. i'll try that flag out. have to figure out where the
start scripts of installed packages lay on my ds110j. i hope i can
modify it to add the -y flag. thx!
--
xeon
xeon's Profile:
A typical 128kbs radio stream will eat around 56MB per hour. So three
hours a week is likely to be around 750MB month.
Is your router's wi-fi secured? If not maybe someone else is leeching
off it.
--
rbz5416
rbz5416's
thanks
--
tieunguyet
tieunguyet's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=44379
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=85883
___
People are simply obsessed with numbers. Simple numbers. Which should be
as high as technically possible. E.g. the widespread Megapixel obsession
when it comes to digital cameras. 'The Megapixel Myth'
(http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm)
--
Soulkeeper
-that is not dead which can
thanks guys, this is interesting. If I turn off my SB without stopping
the radio stream, does it continue to stream..?
The numbers that the SB takes still don't seem high enough to top out
my usage but this is very useful stuff
ta
--
daytripper
daytripper;613489 Wrote:
thanks guys, this is interesting. If I turn off my SB without stopping
the radio stream, does it continue to stream..?
The numbers that the SB takes still don't seem high enough to top out
my usage but this is very useful stuff
ta
hmmm, i don't think so,
Even CDs are 16-bit, and the sonic quality of a CD is an accepted
definition of consumer-worthy HD quality.
That sentence is basically the entire argument
--
adamdea
adamdea's Profile:
Yeah, I understand the overall limited downside, especially with how the
internet in the US is right now, with wildly different speeds and
accessibility, it is not in any way practical at the moment or the near
future. It can take a couple of hours to download 96/24 files on a
decent DSL, and
amey01;613425 Wrote:
The true advantage comes from higher sampling rates. But people seem
obsessed with bit-depth as well.
Oh, really?
Technically speaking, 24 bit-depth allow to reproduce the sound of a
fly farting, immediately followed by the sound of a thunderclap, both
being at relative
rayman1701;613508 Wrote:
I mean really, too much dynamic range, too low a noise floor, really
that's the best you could come up with for an argument against it?
I think the guy's point (which admittedly he doesn't seem to explain
well enough) is that lowering the noise floor and going beyond
sebp;613512 Wrote:
Oh, really?
Technically speaking, 24 bit-depth allows to reproduce the sound of a
fly farting, immediately followed by the sound of a thunderclap, both
being at relative realistic levels.
Higher sampling rates just allow the reproduction of higher
frequencies, which
There is no question that sound quality corresponds to recording quality
and attention to detail by the recording engineer and that many 44.1/16
CDs can sound amazing (think XRCD) and that far too many totally suck
due to loudness wars and compression.
Be that as it may, when you have an
Claiming that 16 bits provides 96 dB of dynamic range ignores the fact
that the distortion rises as the number of bits decreases. For an
analog system, it is OK to define the dynamic range as the ratio of the
loudest signal that can be produced to the quietest (or the noise
floor). But I have a
adamdea;613505 Wrote:
Even CDs are 16-bit, and the sonic quality of a CD is an accepted
definition of consumer-worthy HD quality.
That sentence is basically the entire argument
it's also twaddle...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't
Phil Leigh;613546 Wrote:
it's also twaddle...
Well said
I couldn't agree more.
--
TerryS
TerryS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=40835
View this thread:
TerryS;613524 Wrote:
Claiming that 16 bits provides 96 dB of dynamic range ignores the fact
that the distortion rises as the number of bits decreases. For an
analog system, it is OK to define the dynamic range as the ratio of the
loudest signal that can be produced to the quietest (or the
I hope to not be asking a question that has been asked countless times
before. I did a search but could not find an answer to my dilemma. I
have had my Touch for about a year and a half and have had the usual
dropped connections and what not. Today I am experiencing something
different from the
Phil Leigh;613554 Wrote:
Except it doesn't work like that in practice because we don't record at
16 bits or less, we record at 24 (OK let's call it an effective 21 in
reality) and dither down to 16, effectively masking (decorrelating) the
quantization distortion.
Thus the effect of
I'm also using Net-UDAP. I can get the Squeezebox receiver working when
it's wired, however no matter what settings I use I can't get the
wireless to work. I've tried using the WPA1 and WPA2 examples.
ie:
set interface=0 wireless_mode=0 wireless_region_id=14
wireless_channel=11
mdconnelly;613521 Wrote:
There is no question that sound quality corresponds to recording quality
and attention to detail by the recording engineer and that many 44.1/16
CDs can sound amazing (think XRCD) and that far too many totally suck
due to loudness wars and compression.
I definitely
hoob;613447 Wrote:
My *suspicion* is that the NOT AUTHORIZED error is related to streaming
the WMA directly to the device, perhaps with buffering/retry issues.
This is purely based on the fact that where the Sirius streaming does
work, there's a WMA-to-PCM conversion taking place at the
This site has been instrumental in exposing me to many artists I had
never heard of and unlikely to do so. I have then gone on to buy CDs
(always cheaper than download) and download single tracks. UK radio is
dreadful. Thanks Last FM and I have subscribed but suggest UK people
select dollars
Phil Leigh;613546 Wrote:
it's also twaddle...
Marvelous word - it's been awhile since I've seen it used. I spewed
coffee on the keyboard...
Very amusing
Thanks
Jim
--
usbethjim
All wireless (Linksys WRT54GS) except NAS (ReadyNAS PRO - 3GB RAM - 5 X
1TB drives - XRAID2 - Squeezebox Server
23 matches
Mail list logo
