On 21/01/13 19:10, Andy Hawkins wrote:
In article 50f89995.1070...@cdmnet.org,
Calum Mackaycalum.mac...@cdmnet.org wrote:
any chance you would consider adding a volume control of some sort to
the lockscreen plugin, please?
Might be hard to add a slider, given space, but up/down
thanks, just bought this, having used squeezecommander for years...
Looks very good (using Preview), thanks again, glad to see something
under active development.
best regards,
calum.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
On 17/01/13 17:26, Calum Mackay wrote:
thanks, just bought this, having used squeezecommander for years...
bit cheeky to ask a feature request, so soon after buying, but...
any chance you would consider adding a volume control of some sort to
the lockscreen plugin, please?
Might be hard
margolbe wrote:
# This network must be connected to the first network interface on the
computer, in order for SBR discovery to work. If your SBR is on a
network interface other than the first you must either move it, or
configure down any preceding network interfaces, until it is so
assigned.
Mnyb wrote:
Are you playing a flac file to ?
Then I have to guess that you are using flac/cue files.
Is it so one flac file for a whole album then a cue file ?
These have to be transcoded with flac to get each song from it.
I was going to say that, but the end result is a per-track flac
Mick Seymour wrote:
2. Are you using a crossed or straight cable from SB to the router WAN
port? Should you be using a crossed or straight cable from the SB to
the router WAN port. My guess, without knowing the router, would be a
crossed cable.
I believe all the current SBs have polarity
mirhon wrote:
I've done it. It works fine :-)
I configured my receiver to use DHCP (via WiFi) but now (from some
reasons) I have to change its settings.
Can I change this to static IP doing it the same way as at the
beginning?
Do I have to reset my squeezebox to original state before I
loafsta wrote:
I'm definitely a novice and apologize in advance if I'm asking this
question in the wrong place or if it has been covered elsewhere - I've
certainly looked for an answer, but haven't found one that seemed on
point. I'm considering getting an SBR (w/out SBC), using NAS running
loafsta wrote:
Thanks for the input, Calum. The NAS does run SC using an onboard
Ubuntu system.
ok, I see.
Sounds like I should be able to make this work if I can
just work my way through Net::UDAP - which may be no small feat for me.
It's not too hard, and we can help if you can't get it
mortslim wrote:
When attempting to scroll through these players on the Now Playing
screen (because only three can be seen completely at one time), there
is a little glitchiness in the scrolling behavior. It works for the
most part but once in awhile I have to try a few times with my finger
erland wrote:
After the 1.1 release I can only see three reasons to buy a SBC instead
of a iPod Touch+iPeng:
- You need SBC to configure a Squeezebox Receiver
I know that you know this, but - for others - you don't *need* it for
that...
the perl util Net-UDAP will configure an SBR without an
pippin wrote:
I don't care as to the colour, but the current pale-blue versus
pale-white is difficult.
Okokok.
:)
I did change the icon for the version I re-submitted to the App Store
today.
thanks, much appreciated.
cheers,
calum.
___
discuss
chenrikson wrote:
FWIW both the Philips TSU9600 and TSU9400 can directly control the Duet
Receiver.
interesting; given the Receiver has no IR, I assume these remotes are
wireless, too? Do they interface to SC?
cheers,
calum.
___
discuss mailing list
Aesculus wrote:
Pippin: Would you consider using red rather than blue as your 'On'
color? It may show up better. Its very difficult to pick up the blue
color vs white on the background.
I'd second that; coupled with the inevitable delays in things happening,
the subtle colours are
thanks Mick,
That doesn't sound 'normal'.
quite.
What OS is SC running on and how did you restart it?
apols. This is on Debian Linux, and I did the usual:
/etc/init.d/squeezecenter stop
/etc/init.d/squeezecenter start
cheers,
calum.
seanadams wrote:
I don't understand why anyone is surprised that someone managed to make
yet another lossless format.
heh.
I wonder if they just made the new format by concatenating a flac file
onto the end of an mp3?
:)
cheers,
calum.
___
discuss
I just noted an odd thing here: I restarted SC, to enable a few plugins
(line in/out, I believe), and when it was up again I noticed that it had
lost contact with all my wireless SBs: two Receivers and a Boom.
The Receivers were showing the blue light, and the Boom was asking for
network
iPhone wrote:
Steve Bernard, Jr;409324 Wrote:
C:\Documents and
Settings\Steve\Desktop\mp3HD_Toolkit_for_Windows_2009-03-16mp3hdencoder.exe
-br 32 -if test.wav -of mp3HD.mp3
...
C:\Documents and
Settings\Steve\Desktop\mp3HD_Toolkit_for_Windows_2009-03-16mp3hdDecoder.exe
-if
BiBer wrote:
cdmackay;406547 Wrote:
my XLD is writing both album and track replaygain settings; I'm using
external cue file, but I can't see why it would be different for file
tags.
XLD seem to have no support to embed the replaygain tags into flac, it
only can write them to cue sheets.
BiBer wrote:
Well if you're ripping as separate files, you won't be getting any cue
sheet, i think.
sigh, apols; I keep forgetting I'm in the minority, playing with
single+cue :)
cheers,
calum.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Kyle wrote:
I highly recommend wired. My SB3 worked fine for a couple of years,
then I began to have dropouts -- probably due to neighbors setting up
wireless networks, but who knows? I paid $100 for an alarm company to
run CAT-5 from my bedroom to my den (other end of the house). It was
jsprag wrote:
Good summation. The two aren't mutually exclusive, of course. If a
user wanted they could have RAID mirroring, another internal drive for
nightly (or any other interval) backups, and an external backup.
Starts to add up to a lot of drives though...
quite.
This is why I like
Labarum wrote:
I like the product very much: the name I dislike.
Squeezebox: a downmarket musical instrument.
Squeezebox is to accordion as tin-whistle is to flute; and even an
accordion cannot be considered a serious musical instrument.
I bet that's upset a few folkies :(
so on that note;
tipsen wrote:
iPhone;407277 Wrote:
Looks good to me. So the layout would do all the albums in artist
alphabetical order?
Right now the sort order is album artist, year, albumtitle
I was going to ask about year, as it doesn't seem to be artist/year in
your example...
looks really good...
should I be surprised that by using the email interface to the forums I
never have to do anything, it just works?
or perhaps I'm being moderated anyway? :)
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
tipsen wrote:
cdmackay;407299 Wrote:
tipsen wrote:
iPhone;407277 Wrote:
Looks good to me. So the layout would do all the albums in artist
alphabetical order?
Right now the sort order is album artist, year, albumtitle
I was going to ask about year, as it doesn't seem to be artist/year in
jsprag wrote:
Mistaken deletions are the main reason I don't like RAID for my
situation. Loss of data is far more likely to come from fat fingering
than it is from hardware failure.
Right, and RAID mirroring isn't generally trying to minimise data loss,
it's trying to maximise uptime.
Your
bephillips wrote:
So I just tried XLD for the first time. Looks promising, but some
problems I've noticed, unless I'm missing something.
Album art is embedded, I guess. Don't see any way to save the cover art
as cover.jpg except to do this manually.
if you click on the cover, then you can
53mudg35 wrote:
I plan on going FLAC so I assume it would be best to use a windows
session to perform my rips.
you might consider using XLD on MacOS; I've just started using this, but
it seems very capable. Rips to flac with full accuraterip support.
cheers,
calum.
Zaragon wrote:
Tags are different things to different people. They are metadata but on
SqueezeCentre are used as database identifiers. However since it is
possible to tag two files identically eg the FLAC and MP3 versions of
the same file the only guarantee of uniqueness has to be the fully
ModelCitizen wrote:
maggior;403592 Wrote:
the Slim Devices BU was apparently spared a RIF
Pardon?
OK.
BU = Business Unit?
RIF... typo maybe? should be RIP?
Reduction In Force; fancy name for mass sackings (firings).
:-)
sadly not.
cheers,
calum.
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Threads merged.
missed that, apols.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
burnside wrote:
Can you listen to live BBC Radio with the iPlayer plugin?
yes indeed, if you're in the UK, and I believe it's the highest quality
was of doing that (~100Kbps (Radio 3: 128Kbps) WMA, although Listen
Again is generally higher ~200Kbps MP3).
cheers,
calum.
I put this little summary together, which might be helpful.
Well, if it's correct, of course :)
However, I've not used them enough to comment on stability.
- inbuilt SC; no plugin
65Kbps CBR WMA
native SB decoding; no PC load
Live only; no Listen Again
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7925455.stm
The music streaming service Spotify has been targeted by hackers.
The Swedish company says people's personal details, including e-mail
addresses, dates of birth and addresses, were all stolen.
However, it is thought credit-card details, which
great, thanks; I don't have nearly enough Waits, and this will give me
an excuse to get some more :)
cheers,
calum.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
eq72521 wrote:
Coincidentally, I just set up the new SB Receiver in their room tonight
(replacing the purchased-in-1993-for-$30 Casio CD Alarm Clock Boombox
that was handed down to them). They still just want to listen to the
same old Tom Waits Lullaby mix that I made for them a couple years
37 matches
Mail list logo
