And, by the way...
callesoroe wrote:
> It turns Down the signal BEFORE it comes to your DAC. All DACS do not
> like clipped signals...
DACs really couldn't care less. A DAC doesn't know if a (digital) signal
is clipped or not, and reproduces the signal just the same.
OK, you might have a
callesoroe wrote:
> It turns Down the signal BEFORE it comes to your DAC. All DACS do not
> like clipped signals...
>
> I know that it can not do anything to the recording, but at least it do
> not add more clipping...
>
> My Tact Preamp has a clipping indicator which makes this visable
callesoroe wrote:
> No but so it is not
> And then replay gain can prevent clipping being sent to your DAC. And
> that has a positive effect on the sound.
What, in your view, do you think replay gain actually does?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
callesoroe wrote:
> Replay Gain is a very very nice and usefull function in these "Loudness
> War" times.
If all recordings were compressed to death, we wouldn't need Replay Gain
at all :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity
Wolfy wrote:
> Hi,
> I am wondering if it was possible to play music from your phone or mp3
> player to multiple squeeze players (squeezeplug).
> I would want to be able to do this without having to install anything on
> my phone.
> I would like to hook my phone or MP3 player up to my local netwo
Wolfy wrote:
> If you feel so, why keep arguing?
Stating "according to the weather forecast, it will rain tomorrow" is
not arguing - even if you don't happen to like rain.
Good luck with your search!
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'h
Wolfy wrote:
> so what you are saying is that there are no alternative "players" that
> you know of that has a GUI that dose not look like "LMS" in one way or
> the other unless they are "sugar coated"?
> i believe it is the sugar coating i am looking for. As i said i am
> looking for a nice GUI.
Wolfy wrote:
> it feels old, going thru the settings page it feels rely difficult and
> hard maneuverable.
> the interface feels simple and boring.
>
> same for the jivelite page, in a kind of way it is almost exactly the
> same..
>
> there for i am looking for alternativ gui's
Pretty much all
Wolfy wrote:
> dose there have to be a reason why i don't like using a web interface?
There doesn't have to be a reason - but understanding what you don't
like about it would help in suggesting alternatives (or fixes).
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast
Wolfy wrote:
> mostly because i don't want to use a web gui for acces
Why not?
> In my first post i wrote i don't like the feeling of jivelite
Ah, sorry. What is it about jivelite that you don't like?
> so would like to know if anyone knew of alternative players with a gui
> already integrate
Wolfy wrote:
> no, that means i have to hve a nother computer or tablet open just to
> view whats playing (if I'm running a radio playlist or so)
Why not run the web browser on the RPi?
> squeezelite is possible to run on raspberry pi but it has no gui..
How about 'JiveLite'
(http://forums.sli
Wolfy wrote:
> Hi,
> I have bin testing around with jivelite on a raspberry pi. I'm not super
> fond of it.
> It look's and feels a little old, lagging and not up to speed..
> I have bin looking around to find a player software that has a
> "squeezelite" player incorporated into a gui.
> Ether fo
JayLaFunk wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a bluetooth device(UK) to connect to my Boom and
> send music to a shower bluetooth speaker or is this not possible.
There are tons and tons of bluetooth transmitters that can take the
output of a 3.5 mm jack and send it to a bluetooth speaker, but the
fir
Instead of trying to get a very specialized setup to do things it wasn't
set up to do, why not just run squeezeplayer on the standard raspian
linux? That way you get X, GUI and any other extras you want.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of '
jimmypowder wrote:
> Use decibel meter . It was very clear that the Transporter was not as
> dynamic had less resolution than the Aries. Same files,volume set with
> meter ,coax out.
> Squeezebox Touch was the same
> .Not as good.
So, just to confirm, this was sighted listening, not double-bl
jimmypowder wrote:
> So you are saying the streamer has ZERO impact on sound quality?
Yes. Please explain to me what, in the digital part of a streamer, could
actually make an impact on sound quality.
> If thats the case then we should all just buy the cheapest streamer we
> can buy for audio q
volpone wrote:
> Price?
That would indeed be the most important difference. The other being a
heavy, airspace-grade milled aluminium enclosure... :)
> Audiophiles magazines and fora are full of reviews about such huge
> "differences" but technically i'm quite curious about the reasons ...
If t
volpone wrote:
> Interested in ABX blind tests between, for example, SBT (spdif digital
> output) , and near 2000$ top end UPnP streamers (Bel Canto, Auralic,
> Moon Mind ... ) with the same good DAC.
Just curious, what do you think could/would cause any difference in the
sound?
"To try to ju
volpone wrote:
> Interested in ABX blind tests between, for example, SBT (spdif digital
> output) , and near 2000$ top end UPnP streamers (Bel Canto, Auralic,
> Moon Mind ... ) with the same good DAC.
Archimago, are you listening? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be har
volpone wrote:
> Sound Quality enhancement: Squeeze devices replacement by more
> "high-end" audio streamers.
Just use an external DAC.
> IMHO key point is *if they will be successful in deploying RoonSpeakers
> protocol* to audio hardware vendors (network streamers, DAC, modern
> integrated "
jimmypowder wrote:
> It does,just not as good as some of the other streamers that have been
> introduced over the last several years.
There are differences in the built-in DACs of various streamers that
have an impact on the sound (but still way less than different speakers
or different room pla
epoch1970 wrote:
> Second, don't look now but there is a chance your own systems are using
> nearly 100% of available RAM (applications + cache), plus a bit of swap.
I do tend to look fairly often, and with modern hardware, it is really
hard to get a system to actually swap. Most of my systems d
epoch1970 wrote:
> If your linux machine decides to launch garbage collection/swap what
> happens to audio processing?
Programming language runtime environments do garbage collection, not the
OS (there is no garbage collection in C, for example), and if your
system swaps, you don't have enough R
Pascal Hibon wrote:
> I believe the RPI does not have a hardware clock on-board. The accuracy
> of its clock is therefore maintained by the software (OS ?).
Pretty much every processor has a hardware clock in the sense of "clock
oscillator". From the point of view of accuracy, it doesn't matter
P Nelson wrote:
> If it is the power source then you should be able to filter the noise by
> using capacitors or a choke.
A first, simple step would be a cheap X10 powerline filter.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the
wilbert-vb wrote:
> No, I don't intent to make such claim, Julf.
Thank you for the clarification, and apologies for misreading your
message.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear
wilbert-vb wrote:
> I have been a long time LMS on linux user and a while ago I was testing
> Windows 8.1 and Server 2012 r2 and I noticed a different sound from the
> server 2012 r2, more detailed.
>
So just to check - you are saying that you heard a difference in the
audio quality between the
Kellen wrote:
>
> I think I hear a difference. I'm just not sure if this test is truthful
> or not. On opinion of all . is this a good practice for acurate
> testing.
>
It is better than listening to one set of cables one day and another the
other day.
If you actually want it to be a go
I am not sure it is a good idea to discuss terrorist organisations on
this forum.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
---
Still happy with my 'Empeg cars'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empeg_Car)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
---
pinkdot wrote:
> I will also add a linear supply to the Rpi B+, than it will be as good
> as a Touch or even better!
Do you know that in advance
Sent from my computer using a keyboard
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' th
Sounds like an ALSA-pulseaudio routing issue, but is there any reason
for not usin squeezelite?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
-
garym wrote:
> I have balanced out (from transporter or Benchmark DAC) to balanced
> inputs to Preamp (and then balanced outputs from preamp to balanced
> input to Amp)
That is of course the ideal solution. It is a pity that audiophiles tend
to frown at the "pro" approach of using balanced conn
garym wrote:
> I like the balanced analog outputs of the Transporter.
Balanced outputs are nice, but nowhere as important as balanced inputs.
You get most of the benefits of a balanced connection with an unbalanced
output driving a balanced (differential) input, by using a converter
cable that i
pablolie wrote:
> I can hear a clear difference between the Benchmark and the Audioengine
> even when I use them both exclusively as headphone amplifiers.
So when only using their analog sections?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
wortgefecht wrote:
> How can a MP3 stream be "audiophile"?
It could be an mp3 with Diana Krall... :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch,
wortgefecht wrote:
> Steinberg claims, that this PCIe card is "the best the market has to
> offer".
Don't they all? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people"
agillis wrote:
> - Custom aluminium case. You really need to see it to appreciate how
> beautiful it is and and how well it works. The CD slot is hidden in the
> border. Very "Apple like"
Yes, good looking - but I guess no effect on sound quality.
> - Custom low noise power supply
How much aud
cliveb wrote:
> And they want $2.5k for this?
Well, at least it isn't as bad as the $6,500 you have to pay for the
same stuff in a 'McIntosh box'
(http://www.mcintoshlabs.com/us/Products/pages/categorylanding.aspx?CatId=MediaStreamers).
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be
wortgefecht wrote:
> Not sure, whether this device already came up here
Yes, the SOtM has been discussed every now and then. Mostly with people
questioning the high price compared to something like the Raspberry PI,
but I guess the Sonore people have to recoup the cost of paid product
placement
bonze wrote:
> Is there currently any other solution besides a 'tablet' for use as a
> display?
Pretty much anything that runs java (and thus jivelite).
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gil
Deaf Cat wrote:
> I have no clue how RF, EMF, Capacitance, Inductance, crosstalk, jitter,
> noise, vibration etc. affect the audio signal or data transfer, that is
> why I let my ears do the testing. Read & digest what others say, and
> test what you feel like, that's how I see it anyway.
Which
matka wrote:
> Let's hope that French governement will support them, my streaming and
> downloading depends on qobuz.
Actually, let's hope the French government won't. It would distort the
market and harm other people who want to develop similar services with a
more sustainable model. If we allo
jimmypowder wrote:
> Amazon's audio quality stinks.
>
> It is worse then Spotify,Itunes Radio,Pandora ,etc.
In what way? Lower bitrate? More compression?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid g
cliveb wrote:
> I get the impression that there are licensing complications that would
> have left JackOfAll vulnerable to litigation, but haven't been able to
> figure out what they are.
My understanding (but I might be totally wrong) is that it was not so
much a licensing complication as a lia
donmacn wrote:
> Obviously static IPs are set up with DHCP temporarily disabled on the
> router. Would it be the case that, as soon as you try to reconnect the
> Touch to the network when DHCP has been re-enabled, that it would
> default to a dynamic address?
>
> Knowing next to nothing about h
atca wrote:
> what application / binary do you rely on for CD ripping? I was unaware
> of accurate rip native applications on Linux.
'Morituri' (http://thomas.apestaart.org/morituri/trac/)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity
erland wrote:
> Try to play an ALAC track and measure the CPU usage with "top" or
> similar tool and see if it's using a lot of CPU. I personally suspect
> the CPU you have today is already fast enough, but it's hard to say for
> sure without measuring.
Playing even hi-res FLACs, my 6-year-old l
dyohn wrote:
> Hi. I'm running Vortexbox on a DIY PC with an AMD Athlon processor and
> 1Gb RAM, so it's a Fedora 20 kernel and LMS 7.8. My library is about
> 1.4Tb on a 2Tb drive but that's probably not really pertinent to my
> question. It's not that I think anything is necessarily slow, it'
garym wrote:
> Never had a single issue with spotify, but I'm sure some do, just as
> some have troubles with LMS in general, which I luckily don't either.
Likewise, both spotify and LMS just work for me without problems. Never
used mysb.com.
"To try to judge the real from the false will alwa
And remember that BBC FM broadcasts are distributed to the transmitter
stations using a 14-compressed-into-10-bit/32 kHz NICAM digital
distribution backbone.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid
garym wrote:
> Not that there is anything wrong with 16/44.1, but it seems to be a
> ripoff to sell hires files with no transparency regarding their source.
I agree - nothing wrong with 16/44.1, but not very keen to pay a premium
just to get a lot of empty space in the file...
"To try to judg
bluegaspode wrote:
> SqueezePlayer uses the Google NDK (native development kit), to be very
> performant even on very old devices (like HTC Wildfire with only 500Mhz
> CPU).
> Typically this layer is not ported in emulators (which is why
> SqueezePlayer also doesn't run on Blackberry).
>
> I hav
agillis wrote:
> A non networked music player does not interest me but a music store
> filled with studio masters in FLAC format does. If they can get licenses
> to good masters and the ability to release them as FLAC that will be
> huge. The Pono music store will be the best part.
Not sure why
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
> So it's not actually an Android device, I rather suspect SqueezePlayer
> needs some sort of more direct access to the audio api/hardware than the
> compatibility layer on the Jolla OS provides.
Quite possible - it is just interesting that it never actually gets
installed, t
Mnyb wrote:
> the pricing is going to be higher because I get the random noise in
> classic/old recordings spread on more bits ?
I love the open, airy sound of all those empty bits!
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the q
I purchased the app from the google play store, but unfortunately it
seems the installer crashes on the android compatibility layer of my
jolla phone :(. Strangely this doesn't happen with other apps from the
store.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-grow
garym wrote:
> :eek: My biases showing. I was assuming that a Finish music lover would
> obviously live in that part of the world. Sorry
I am originally Finnish, and I really don't like that stuff, so... :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing
netchord wrote:
> the hi-res FLAC subscription is wonderful, clearly better than 320 from
> Spotify, MOG, Beats, etc.
So you managed to do a controlled double-blind ABX comparision?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the q
Nonreality wrote:
> You miss my point. He can't change everything that's wrong with music
> formats and he has chosen this way to try to introduce people to a
> better format.
There is nothing wrong with 44.1/16 (apart from not giving the record
labels enough revenue).
"To try to judge the re
Mnyb wrote:
> EDIT: you can buy the music ! :) I would sure try out the store if it
> works better than HD tracks.
And I seem to remember Neil Young had something against DSD/SACD, so I
guess the stuff will be all-multibit.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
kesey wrote:
> Have a look at www.ponomusic.com
>
> Neil Young launched his funding round on Kickstarter yesterday March
> 11th, and there are already 5000+ backers who have kicked in $1.6
> million. The PonoPlayer is scheduled to launch in October next. The
> video is well worth a watch on http
kaja69 wrote:
> Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
'How to disable tapatalk sig'
(http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2218964).
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that wi
freelsjd wrote:
> I discovered pono which is expected out soon.
It has been "expected" for quite a while now. It might be more "out"
than anything...
> This appears to be much smarter
Smarter? Yet Another Proprietary Format With Silly Copy Protection - not
sure I would use the adjective "smart
dsm1212 wrote:
> Spotify only lets me play one song at a time
Premium lets you have multiple players.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsc
Ikabob wrote:
> Could a neighbor's connection be causing interference during prime time?
> I'll keep checking but right now (9:15am est) all is well. Not a single
> rebuf.
'Cable is shared bandwidth...'
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdiGsjfbjWw)
"To try to judge the real from the false will
Mart1 wrote:
> So if I go through the SB-receiver in the tv-room as well, then all
> zones would be synced?
Yes, but not with the TV picture, better leave the AV alone.
> wav sounds like not so good quality, but I am still curious: how is it
> done?
Wav should sound just as good as flac - why
Otto-Wilhelm wrote:
> I see no disadvantage of using IPeng, which I use at home as well for
> controlling my different Squeezebox devices. In the car the iPhone is
> placed in a cradle fixed to the dashboard to be conveniently accessible
> during driving. There is no need for accessing other func
gstew wrote:
> Given these, I'm curious why my request is a big deal?
Extra complexity for something nobody really needs?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many peop
JackOfAll wrote:
> Guys, this is wandering into off-topic discussing the merits (or
> not) of absolute phase. (Maybe take it to the Audiofool sub-forum. ;))
Agree.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will b
gstew wrote:
> I have speakers that do preserve waveform timing and phase
I am curious about what speakers you have, and how you know they
preserve waveform timing and phase.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery
gstew wrote:
> Absolute phase of the recording is easily measured.
How? Wouldn't you have to know the original signal?
> Instruments or voices recorded out-of-phase can be most easily discerned
> with speakers that preserve the recorded waveform shape, typically
> full-range single-driver or mu
gstew wrote:
> Q2 - It can be easily done in either the SW or the firmware. I'm not
> sure where it could be most easily done in this architecture, I figured
> asking here might get a response that would clarify that.
Well, it is best done once, on the FLAC (or whetever) file, instead of
every t
gstew wrote:
> What about being able to invert phase? I know the system will handle it
> to provide the balanced output. Is it possible to have a selectable
> 'In-Phase / Reverse-Phase' option. I have that in my current computer
> music player (cPlay) and while I don't use it much, when it is nee
xvlun wrote:
> So as long as I keep using digital outs (and sample rates of 44.1/48
> kHz, I could use just about any external soundcard?
Yes.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge tha
volpone wrote:
> My goal is to get, as soon as possible, a SB Touch alternative or
> replacement for my HIFI digital setup and the most important point is
> audio quality associated with Rega external DAC (or other good external
> audiophile DAC).
Well, Rega makes a point about their USB input b
volpone wrote:
> In my setup i would prefer to use an external DAC (Rega DAC) but i'm
> very pleased that digital outputs will be good.
But if you only want to use an external DAC, wouldn't a raspberry pi
work for you?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast
nicky6 wrote:
> When I ripped my CD's (about 1000) back in 2002-2003, I did them as
> 320Kbps VBR MP3's. I'm not sure I want to go through the process doing
> FLAC's instead, and rating all the music again just to have the music
> rated 3-5 available for listening and the rest archived. Any compa
nicky6 wrote:
> Will install some Linux dist on it. Anything that's recommended? I don't
> know anything about Linux, but I do want some kind of RAID (RAID 0 and 1
> supported on HW controller)
I still think Ubuntu is probably the easiest.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always
JJZolx wrote:
> Alternatively, you could add a COMPILATION=0 field that would keep the
> album from being marked a compilation.
In my experience that doesn't work with LMS/Slimserver. COMPILATION=1
forces the album to be a compilation, but COMPILATION=0 does *not* force
the album to not be a co
Ikabob wrote:
> Not to detract from this informative thread, but what is the definition
> of a "headless server"? What does it do? Thanks.
A pure server, without display or keyboard (or touch display). Thus the
only way to interact with the server is over the network (or by pulling
the power or
the nightfly wrote:
> If I hook a SqueezePlug device up to the HDMI input on my A/V receiver,
> is it going to send a PCM bitstream to the receiver's built-in DAC, or
> is it going to send analog audio processed by the Pi's own DAC?
The audio on a HDMI connection is digital, so it will use the D
SlimChances wrote:
> No Linux support as far as I can see :(
The slashdot post had a link to instructions for running the server on a
raspberry pi, but not sure about a client for linux...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity
vzs wrote:
> The perception and verification question is a very stuffed subject - I'm
> open to discuss it but maybe in another thread.
Yes, probably better in the Audiophile section.
> Of course I'm using an analog filter, for now a passive second order
> low-pass filter. I have in plans to tr
vzs wrote:
> Yes, my DAC system is based around a classic multibit AD1865 without a
> digital filter (basically its a NOS DAC) and I want to do (I'm doing on
> PC) upsampling to 352k8 in software with SoX as I perceive it being
> better then off the shelf digital filters I could use.
Have you ve
vzs wrote:
> I'm currently running SqueezeLite on my Touch connected to an Amanero
> Combo384 and stream 352K8 upsampled FLACs to my DAC from an LMS 7.8
> installed on my PC. My albums are mainly 44.1K FLACs on an external USB
> drive.
Is there any specific reason you want to do the upsampling o
Kuro wrote:
> If any of you guys believe different USB cable makes for a difference in
> sound or using a different buffer size in Squeezelite or EDO will make a
> difference in sound, then it is not so hard to believe a LAN cable can
> also make a difference in sound.
And if you believe that, t
baconrad wrote:
> Hi there,
> There's a great radio show called Idiots Delight that has a stream
> available from WFUV radio for the latest show each week. I dont see a
> podcast. I would like to be able to listen to it on my squeezebox. It
> seems like it uses a flash player as it won't play on
Kuro wrote:
> Finally someone agrees with what I found.
Please take this discussion to the audiophile forum, where we are more
than happy to set your misconceptions right :)
Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/m
RobbeD wrote:
> is there a way to make the script use less resources?
Only had a quick look, but it is a busy loop that gets executed once per
second. I would look at something like the xPL plugin or something else
that can actively send you a message when the player gets activated.
--
SlimChances wrote:
> If Ickstream is reliant on having LMS installed and new OSs appear that
> are not compatible with the old LMS (presumably we will never get beyond
> LMS 7.8 now Squeezebox is discontinued) where does that leave us?
Worst case it will leave you running LMS in a virtual machin
TheD6Bel wrote:
> but I have another error
>
> root@squeezeplug:/home# ./gpio.sh
> File "./gpio.sh", line 84
> if playerdetected <> "":
> ^
> SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>
> I I'm not good in script, so I do not know fix it
This isn't really a script error, it is a python syntax error, and the
garym wrote:
> yep, and the OP is not trying to make the sound better. He's got some
> sort of odd 'tag' issue, that so far has not been easily solved,
> although I'm sure it will be eventually.
Sure. Just wanted to make sure that some audiophool wouldn't read the
posing from DJanGo as implying
DJanGo wrote:
> Why?
> If you say -the source is cd then re-ripp and tag them. Converting from
> to and backwards again wouldnt make better sounds, may better tags - so
> reripp them from the sources.
Converting flac-wav-flac won't make the sound better, but it won't make
it worse either. Re-rip
rpress wrote:
> I have ported Squeezeslave to the "empeg" using the Boom interface and I
> quite enjoy it. [/url]
Very cool! But I have to ask "why?", as the default empeg user interface
is pretty well optimized, and it can already contain all the music you
might want even without an external se
bernid wrote:
> I have considered DIY box that would accommodate four main components
> (each with separate PSU) e.g. Carrier board , DAC (connected with
> carrier board via I2S) and two separate clocks.
But if someone is that obsessive and doesn't want to use the built-in
stuff anyway, why wo
Mark Miksis wrote:
> Or is this the wrong way to think about it and should I just plan on
> buying good powered speakers and a separate USB DAC in line with my
> price/performance point?
Going for separates makes it easier to upgrade only the part that
becomes obsolete first...
---
maggior wrote:
> What form will the "community hardware" take? Community software
> projects make sense, but I've never heard of a community hardware
> project. Will it be a parts list? A kit?
'Wikipedia: Open Source Hardware'
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_hardware)
castalla wrote:
> ps: I do not have any i-Thingy things
You could have done what I did - gone for the Nokia N9. Great hardware,
great software - apart from all the bugs that could easily have been
ironed out if Nokia hadn't chucked out their whole Linux group. Sounds
familiar? :)
-
pippin wrote:
> if you speak about Germany you are just as much caught up in
> legislation, just different one.
Sure. But at least legislation that the Germans are more familiar with.
> No, because the law originally had a flaw that actually allowed the code
> to be exported in printed form (on
201 - 300 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
