ceejay wrote:
Robin Bowes;268276 Wrote:
What part of it can also be configured via the ethernet port do you
not understand?
R.
Robin
Actually, the whole point of this part of the discussion is that the
SBR CAN'T be configured by its ethernet port. It will only, AFAIK,
initially talk
guinness wrote:
I appreciate the sentiment behind this thread, but I'm afraid I dont
agree with it one bit. Do you think we should also put a stop to any
of the I love my SB titles too, just to ensure that we dont ever sway
too close to voicing an opinion in either direction? Forums are
mvalera wrote:
Our first priority is to get Duet out the door. I'm sure once things
are settled a bit, either we or someone else in the community will
come up with a way to configure a SB Receiver without a SB
Controller.
*cough*
But it will have to be on a WiFi enabled device, like a
gbruzzo wrote:
I would love to see a larger, portable touch
screen interface (larger than the controller - which I have ordered and
am waiting for eagerly): this is something Logitech might very well do
one day, and it makes more sense to me than some of the fat player
solutions people have
djfake wrote:
Robin Bowes;268246 Wrote:
It can also be configured via the ethernet port.
Yeah, cough is right. Why can't you configure it via wired ethernet?
Most every network device embeds something to do this - I have a NAS
device that does this.
Okay, Logitech's first priority
radish wrote:
[an attempt to hold a rational discussion with MrSinatra]
radish,
If you look back at previous threads, you will see that MrSinatra
doesn't let trivial issues like facts get in the way of his opinion.
He sees things the way he sees things, and will swear blind that black
is
MrSinatra wrote:
we slapped 4 500gig sata drives in it and used xraid, we got 1.3TB.
so, it seems to me to be a nice low energy always on storage server
that you can webaccess and so on.
It may me nice and always on, but with 4x500Gb drives it will be
anything but low energy. The lion's
EnochLight wrote:
Marc Sherman;264410 Wrote:
..If I recall correctly, SS6 was still getting last minute bug fixes
right up to the day that transporters were available in stores...I'd
also expect a few point releases to follow very shortly afterwards.
- Marc
The way Slim Devices works, in
EnochLight wrote:
I don't know about you, but I can't stand a flat, non-eq'd audio
source when I am listening for enjoyment.
If I were a mastering tech in the studio, sure - but not when I want
to feel the thundering bass of Zeppelin's When the Levee Breaks!
Get yourself a decent setup then
radish wrote:
radish;261013 Wrote:
I just bought the new iteration of the T-amp for $65. Somewhat louder
than the old one, same great sound quality and lousy build quality :)
But it works great for small speakers small rooms, and you can't beat
the price.
So this is interesting. I read
Michael Herger wrote:
Did you miss the ;) at the bottom of my post?
Maybe. But it doesn't matter: the whole discussion is a joke :-).
I just find it interesting to see how Anglophiles can care about their
language, while we get spoilt with anglicisms. Worst of all some of them
find
haunyack wrote:
[diatribe snipped]
Once you're over your anger (try kicking the cat) perhaps you'd like to
give us some diagnostics? Platform (O/S, server spec, etc)? Server
version? Your infrastructure (wired/wireless)? Any useful log msgs?
FWIW, I have a Transporter and run the latest trunk
RuneR wrote:
Hello
I was wondering, will I have trouble running the new (Duet)with SC on
my Synology 407e. Well let me rephrase it will it run smoothly ?
NAS spec:
CPU Clock Rate: 266 MHz
RAM Size: 64MB
Probably.
I've got SC installed on a Kurobox - slightly faster click I think, and
bklaas wrote:
this has come up in the past...my two cents:
the English spell it 'centre'
the Americans spell it 'center'
SqueezeCenter, however, is a *product*. If you spelled it
SqueezeCentre, there is no product with that name, and is therefore
'incorrect'.
Another way of putting
Michael Herger wrote:
Anglophiles, does that put this matter to rest?
No, because you got it wrong in the first place. Imagine how idyllic
life could have been:
Wow, you got problems. Interestingly there's no Francophone, Germanophone,
XYophone discussing. We suffer from these anglicisms
max.spicer wrote:
I'd like to set up my Squeezeboxen so I can quickly listen to BBC Radio
3 and BBC Radio 4 when I want to. What's the easiest way to do this?
Cheers,
Max
Using the remote:
Internet Radio - Staff Picks - By city - London, UK - BBC Radio 3
(UK ONLY) - Go right to add
amcluesent wrote:
So, my Humax PVR9200T will record radio shows (i.e. BBC Radio 3) to .ts
format files. I assume there is an 48Khz mp2 stream embedded in the .ts
container.
Anyone successfully processing .ts file content to allowing editing and
then playback on SB3?
I've not used it, but
aubuti wrote:
The idea is that my main SC machine is a Buffalo LinkStation, which
streams just fine but takes almost an hour to scan my ~4000 track
library of FLAC.
Only an hour?? My collection of ~40k mp3 tracks takes about 8 hours! :)
R.
___
rtitmuss wrote:
krikor;260123 Wrote:
mvalera in a previous post in this thread indicated that they were not
sure this was possible. I'm just trying to determine if I purchase
just the controller and make it work as I've already got plenty of
SB3s. I did see that Robin Bowes indicates
mflint wrote:
Mine's a Seagate too, 320GB. Model ST3320620A.
Is the cooling fan running in your Kuro?
Yes, it is.
I've got it up and running at the moment and seem to be holding steady
at 45C, but I suspect the acid test will be when I rsync my mp3 folder
to it.
I'm planning to get one
snarlydwarf wrote:
A ton of customers Just Work with the dropping of Common Album Names
and the must-be-same-album-if-in-same-directory code. Common Album
Names sucked.
Agreed. I don't think it's an unreasonable requirement that tracks from
the same album are in the same directory.
R.
jezbo wrote:
Whole-heartedly disagree.
I'm a developer myself, and our happiness is not the issue,
Correct. The customers much be happy, which most are.
a product must be flexible enough to satisfy the majority of
customers.
Which it does.
Making some rule rigid so that it only
ModelCitizen wrote:
Robin Bowes;259137 Wrote:
Or maybe sooner...
Yeah, haven't you finished reading that Perl for Beginners book yet?
Ha! I'm on page 5... ;)
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com
Espen wrote:
(first post in this forum, hope this is the right sub forum).
I have always named my ripped albums to folders named like artist -
year - album title to allow a proper chronology when listing
folders (alfabetically) in a filesystem.
Is it possible to do the same in a
krikor wrote:
Perhaps it has been covered already and I missed it, but has it been
confirmed that the new remote will work through an ad-hoc connection
with an SB3 connected via wired ethernet to the server? I know there
was a question as to whether or not this is possible.
Yes, this will
Espen wrote:
Robin Bowes;259257 Wrote:
Look for the Albumview options button just above (?) Help in the
bottom left of the page.
(I assume you're using the default skin)
R.
I use the standard skin (Logitech green so to say).
I see no such button on the general front page. I am using
mflint wrote:
I happily use a Kurobox HG/WR for SqueezeCenter 7 with a Squeezebox
Controller. It has just 128Mb, but seems to perform well with my
collection of approximately 4000 tracks.
It also has gigabit ethernet (but probably not enough processor grunt
to make use of it!)
Matthew,
JJZolx wrote:
mvalera;259084 Wrote:
I don't understand
He doesn't want a controller. Many existing users prefer to control
their Squeezeboxes with laptops, PCs, PDAs, Nokia Nseries, iPhones,
iPod Touches, etc. If you're going to place the SB in a closet, the
$150 SBR makes more sense
Peter wrote:
OK, Let's compare it to a different but similarly priced product:
I just ordered a Linksys (US brand) switch in Holland at
centralpoint.nl, type srw2008mp for 276 EUR ($393) including taxes (VAT 19%)
Without taxes that would be $330 USD
Google takes me to Mwave.com as the
Ken wrote:
I have used Homeplug for a number of years (in UK) with input from
router going in to one ring circuit and output from another ring
circuit. There is a considerable drop in throughput; theoretically
14mbps and in practice less than 2mbps but this works adequately for
Flac
IRJ wrote:
I was asking the question to find out if SD had perhaps made an
error/missed an opportunity in not moving to an N standard WiFi
receiver/contoller chipsets in their new units. SD obviously want us
to innstall muliple units, however, reading the responses this is
most likely
Diana Artemis wrote:
Mitch Harding wrote:
I would buy the SB regardless of the label, provided it's the same SB inside.
The hardware is only part of the story. A very important part, but
still a part. Just out of interest, does anyone know what kind of
licence the SqueezeCentre Software
blorty wrote:
I'm looking at about 8 zones, some of which consist of in-ceiling
speakers whose speaker wire runs back to central home theater panel in
the family room. The other zones would simply be local bookshelf or
outdoor speakers.
OK. Are you looking to replicate that setup (all zones
Skunk wrote:
Tradewind25;255864 Wrote:
I have a Squeezebox 3. I wish to add one of the new Receivers in
another room, and ideally synchronize the two.
Can I achieve this with my current SB3 remote, or would I also need to
purchase one of the new Controllers?
(I think I read that the
IRJ wrote:
Now they issue a new SB, the SBR, for an excellent $150.00. I became
excited that I could pair with my original SBs and continue to control
them all with my WiFi. Although some seem to think this is clunky, I
find it highly satisfactory. But Nope! To conrol an SBR one needs the
ModelCitizen wrote:
In the US the Duo costs 399.99 US Dollars (equiv. to 172.103 UK Pounds)
but in the UK it costs 551.17 US Dollars (279 UK Pounds)
What possible justification can there be for this almost 40% price hike
for UK buyers?
Er, I think your sums may have gone a little awry.
Mitch Harding wrote:
Since you still see your problem even with a wired network, then
bitrate limiting for the purpose of reducing network bandwidth
shouldn't matter, since the wired connection should have solved that.
However, I suppose it's possible that the higher quality mp3 files
were
Michael Herger wrote:
Shame about this! I would guess it would be a pretty easy thing to
fix,
Patches are always welcome.
and I can't imagine many find this feature to be useful...
From the machine's point of view the file doesn't exist any more.
Whether it's been deleted or the disc
amorphia wrote:
Hi all,
I have a silly habit of forgetting to turn on my network hard drive
where my music resides before trying to play a song on the squeezebox.
Slimserver has a silly habit deleting the said song from the library
index whenever this happens. This forces me to do a full
sleepysurf wrote:
I've encountered that problem myself a number of times... VERY
frustrating. Playlist index can also be messed up in same fashion.
Hopefully it's somewhere on their To-Fix list.
I don't believe so.
Now, if I could only find the thread in which I discussed this with kdf...
Michael Herger wrote:
(twice as good and half the price)
What would double the SB's value for you?
Value = (Quality / Price) ** 2 ? Interesting. ;)
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
haraldo wrote:
Yeah
Simplest to do the x-over cable and if it gets too much hassle, then
you could always add a switch later. You don't burn any bridges by
doing this.
Let me also correct something else: a switch would be no help in this
situation; switches do not, as a rule, run DHCP
Nickolay V wrote:
I can not find any information on site and forums about computer
hardware requirements for great number simultaneously playing
squeezeboxes (8/10/20 or 32). I mean multizone audio multiroom mode.
Can anybody make all information table for users :
winwows PC /
Linux PC /
NauticusLX wrote:
Bottom line: the display set to 0 brightness comes on if the phone
rings, and the stream is interrupted if I make or receive a call. It's
not set up in a way that's not intended, so don't say there's something
wrong with my setup because nothing's wrong - other than these
oreillymj wrote:
It certainly has never been an issue for me and I believe it's not just
me, the forum would be inundated if it was a universal issue.
Mark,
You're wrong about this. I have raised this issue at least 3 times on
these forums and it has been quietly ignored. There is a bug
matek994 wrote:
Hi,
thanks for your reply.
The problem I have is that when I select a song which is in FLAC format
(MP3's are not affected) it starts to play, but then there are
intermittent dropouts during the first half minute or so. After a while
the song plays alright. Any subsequent
NauticusLX wrote:
This happened to me about 11 months ago and the thread was almost
famous for a while. The problem was never really resolved, and
continues.
1st, if you have DSL web access, incoming phone calls will turn on
the device if it's off, and vice versa, the same for outgoing
duloque wrote:
Here is my weird problem:
The analog output of my SB3 does well, but the digital ones only
transport some calm silence.
Neither optical nor coax out will give my speakers a single sound.
Is there a solution or is my beloved SB3 broken?
Plz help!! :(
What have you got
damir wrote:
it has the attention of the former CEO of Slim Devices,
what more do you want??
Yes, that is the right question, thank you for pointing it out.
I certanly want nothing from Sean/Slimdevices. He did what he
has to do, I'm already grateful for response and pretty sure
they
sikahr wrote:
Through this thread (6 days/52 replays/1390 views) only me, dcote and
Damir (and Sean/slimdevices I hope) cares to listen, all others blindly
believe what I say?
No, we just don't really care.
You have reported a bug, and gone into excellent detail about how to
reproduce it.
y360 wrote:
Robin Bowes;245326 Wrote:
No, we just don't really care.
Nice, that royal we
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
we (wē)
pron.
1. Used by the speaker or writer to indicate the speaker or writer
along with another or others as the subject:
We made it to the lecture hall
amcluesent wrote:
Yep, MusicInfoScr is great - esp. for classical music with a TP.
Everything on the display :)
Out of interest, how are you tagging your files, and how have you got
MusicInfoScr setup to achieve this? How to it work with popular music?
R.
fred7 wrote:
Robin Bowes;244637 Wrote:
sikahr wrote:
Nobody knows the trouble I see ( hear)
Nobody knows but me ( Sean)
:)))
and nobody cares! :)
R.
It sure seems that Sean Adams cares. This seems to be a minor bug if it
exists at all. I'm sure that most companies wouldn't even
minstrel wrote:
My only possible explanation is that broadcasting from my Apple G5
directly to the AE via Airtunes somehow provides a more unaldulterated
sound compared to using the SB3 off of my 801.11g network.
You might like to make sure you're not bit rate limiting to the SB3.
Looking
sikahr wrote:
Nobody knows the trouble I see ( hear)
Nobody knows but me ( Sean)
:)))
...and nobody cares! :)
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
iPhone wrote:
I just don’t get all this about a portable SB3 with built in speakers.
And then wrote:
If you want to be portable, try what I use. I found one of those house
cleaning caddies that my speakers fit perfectly into (the kind with the
handle in the center with a tray on each side
Gibbo wrote:
The problem being, I hate working in silence, the lab will be far too
open plan for people to have their own music on. I can understand that
some people may not want any music at all, perhaps a system of randon
play on the squeezebox, with certain genres / bands being banned from
dcote wrote:
and to be honest, i would hate to have to re-arrange ~6500 files just
because SS doesnt have a way to deal with this. ;-)
You really should use a more hierarchical structure. It will make your
life much easier.
Something like this:
f:/music/mp3/artist/album/
Most of
Gibbo wrote:
I'm working for a company that in the next 6 months will move to a new
lab (i'm a chemist) i'm trying to convince my boss that in a lab of
around 8-10 people, around 70 sq ft at a vague guess, radio just will
not do as not all the people will be happy listening to any station,
Deaf Cat wrote:
Cheers for that, both of you!
Just double checking, so with Robocopy I can back up any *.exe files,
like slimserver, mp3tag etc, and just reload if anything goes wrong
(after of course XP is back on), Unless I get Ghost, yes?
You can't copy any executable files that are
cepstein wrote:
JJZolx;238771 Wrote:
Find (or write) a script that transcodes from Flac to Mp3 and keeps the
library updated. I schedule mine to run nightly and any updates to my
Flac library are automatically reflected in the Mp3 library.
I've written many (http://etree-scripts.sf.net/),
pichonCalavera wrote:
I too would like to sort my artists by first name, for example, right
now -David Bowie- appears between -Apocalyptica- and -Coldplay-, but I
would like -David Bowie- to appear between -Coldplay- and -Elefant-
instead.
Is there a way to acomplish this? , I don't mind
pichonCalavera wrote:
I too would like to sort my artists by first name, for example, right
now -David Bowie- appears between -Apocalyptica- and -Coldplay-, but I
would like -David Bowie- to appear between -Coldplay- and -Elefant-
instead.
Is there a way to acomplish this? , I don't mind
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Empgamer;232967 Wrote:
Not a good start for me this. Gone from being very excited about the
whole thing to thinking that maybe I'd be better off ordering Sonos
instead :-(
But you had several top-level people at Logitech going to bat for you,
including the former CEO
xio wrote:
Some people however, go out of their way to take offence I find. Pot.
Kettle.
Black!
R.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/discuss
Empgamer wrote:
@ Robin: Having had the experience I have with Datakits, I presume you
feel I should be celebrating now that I have at last got a response? I
shan't even waste my time addressing the rest of the dreck and will
treat such banal comments with the contempt they deserve.
You can
mike_zandvliet wrote:
Hello everyone!
I need advice from anyone who knows about amps and large speakers...
if that's you - please read on!
I am in charge of the music for an event coming up in a few months
time, and have absolutely no idea what kind of amp and speaker set up I
need.
Solvason-Pastuch wrote:
David
Oh, I know your pain. I have always, and still do, feel that this piece of
equipment is nothing but a techie toy. Imagine how many cars there would be
on the road if they had to update their software evry night. Zero! If
evertime they crashed, someone
simbo wrote:
Ben Sandee;229623 Wrote:
That's a bit pricey for the bidding to start for a cardboard box.
I'm sure the original SlimDevices boxes are stronger than Logitech
ones. Or sound better. Or nine out of ten cats prefer them for sleeping
in.
Did you blind test that?
R.
NeilF wrote:
I can reproduce it at will...
Open a browser (FireFox or IE) say to bbc.co.uk, and run the 5000kbps
test in SlimServer... Get 100%.
Move to the 'cbeebies' page (http://www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/) results
drop...
Move back to bbc.co.uk, results return to 100%.
All the time
funkstar wrote:
radii;227348 Wrote:
The wireless network seems to be plenty fast enough; another machine in
the same room clocks in at 450 kbyte/sec, and I never see rebuffering
problems with Ogg.
450Kbyte/sec is a really poor wireless connection. You'll need in the
region of 800kbit/sec
808 wrote:
A pair of the acclaimed active Audio Engine A5's in black for sale.
I've had these hooked up to the sb2 for less than a month from new,
their now in a box ready to go. Girlfriend didn't approve of the size
of the speakers, had to replace them with the tiny but excellent Aego
M's.
JJZolx wrote:
ds2021;225440 Wrote:
Can anyone provide some feedback on their experience running SS7.0a? It
seems that a 'bug fix (4638)'
(http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4638) that I have been
waiting on exists, but only in SS7. Given the warnings that precede the
download of
agentsmith wrote:
My experience with Homeplug, even my Panasonic Homeplug AV, is that it
does not go much over 4-5 Mega Bits per second. At least in my home
electrical system they don't.
Are you sure you're not confusing mega *bits* with mega *bytes* ?
Homeplug is 85 mega *bits* / second,
jordi.c wrote:
erland;222750 Wrote:
I don't have the answer to your question, but until someone else give
you an answer I have some questions.
Why do you want to browse by music folder if your music is correctly
tagged ?
Do you miss some browsing mechanism in the standard tag based
Velcroman wrote:
Still, I'm at a loss here. There's a clear, direct link between file
access in SlimServer and this RAID error. Right? I don't _think_ it's
an actual RAID error, I think there's some confusion in some piece of
software somewhere, probably on nVidia's end. But what do I know?
chris.mason wrote:
Thanks for all the responses so far, very helpful.
I'm going to play with both ClarkConnect and Ubuntu I think, and see
what happens..!
You mentioned you work with Solaris during the day - why not try
OpenSolaris?
R.
___
4mula1 wrote:
chris.mason;221771 Wrote:
Mark, thanks for such a full answer. I'm pretty comfortable with Linux
command line (I use Solaris in my job, and thats a possibility I
guess).
Solaris handles SlimServer pretty well. Some programs are a bit quirky
to compile, but the resources
mkanet wrote:
I am guessing by the comments that what I'm asking is either not
possible or there isn't the expertise necessary to help me achieve what
I asked for in the title of the thread. Anyway, there is a good reason
why I prefer to keep just a single discrete ssh connection.
I have
mkanet wrote:
Great, could you please tell me what you did to make it work. I already
forwarded ports 9000 and 3483 (client to server ssh forwarding) and
pointed softsqueeze to localhost. That's actually the first thing I
tried. I dont have any problems doing port forwarding for other apps.
katabasis wrote:
ps. If this software had java support, lots of more people could
contribute with improvements, included myself
PPS. If you learned perl, you could contribute to this software and many
other projects.
R.
___
discuss mailing list
Tom wrote:
Tom;219217 Wrote:
You do know that Logitech is a European company, right?
No, they are a Swiss company (Switzerland is not a member of the EU).
Tom
But last time I looked it was still part of Europe though.
In the sense that Canada and Mexico are American, yes.
They are. Both
adamslim wrote:
Robin Bowes;220157 Wrote:
They are. Both are on the continent of North America [1]
Just as Switzerland is on the continent of Europe [2]
R.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America
[2] p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe
Sheesh, the way people are reviving old
apmadsen wrote:
Why does it clear the playlist whenever i press play to play a song? It
takes forever to add all the songs again.
Because that's what play means.
If you just want to add a song to the play list, press +.
Isn't there a way to get around this, so that it behaves like any other
gdg wrote:
Robin Bowes;216227 Wrote:
As you obviously know all there is to know about the subject you won't
be needing my help.
Hope you fix it.
R.
In a transparent effort to blame me for the fact that I haven't been
able to resolve this issue you accused me of not following up
pfarrell wrote:
I agree, I think a separate for sale by owner section would be a good
idea.
I've got a Benchmark DAC-1 that I'd like to sell to a good home. for
sale postings really don't belong in the existing sections. And I'd
rather sell it to a smart, talented and good looking person on
Pat Farrell wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
Sorry Pat, I don't want a Banchmark DAC-1. :)
Then it wouldn't be a good home at your place.
But you have to admit that your reply is a tad OT.
Do you want a for sale or not?
What rules?
It was an attempt at humour.
You said:
...I'd rather sell
gdg wrote:
All of a sudden a squeezebox, that has worked fine for 2 years, starts
timing out and disconnecting and no one can give a hint why.
F^*()
You were given several hints in replies to your original post, but you
don't seem to have responded to
gdg wrote:
My system info is posted about 3 posts back.
You said:
AMD Athalon 64 Processor 3000+
1.79 GHz
1.00 GB of RAM
200 Gig Hard Drive (90 Gigs free)
All I can tell from that is that you should be OK for processing power
and memory.
It doesn't tell me:
1. What O/S and version of
steelhead wrote:
I have a new problem with my Squeezebox: all of a sudden, all music
played over slimserver is choppy, I cannot listen to any tracks. I've
had my Squeezebox for just over a month and it had been working fine.
I get a clear signal with Squeezenetwork.
I'm on Mac (Intel)
gdg wrote:
Robin Bowes;216131 Wrote:
gdg wrote:
My system info is posted about 3 posts back.
You said:
AMD Athalon 64 Processor 3000+
1.79 GHz
1.00 GB of RAM
200 Gig Hard Drive (90 Gigs free)
All I can tell from that is that you should be OK for processing power
and memory
steelhead wrote:
I'll have to get another e-net cord to try that.
Thanks much for all your advice...I suspect I'll post again at
beginning of the week.
Looks like it is a wireless networking issue.
Hope you get it sorted.
R.
PS.
Note to gdg:
Please read how steelhead has responded in
darrenyeats wrote:
Robin Bowes;214209 Wrote:
You have got it wrong!
Curse that send button! Er, thank you.
I think I'm going to stick with unison for the time being because what
I'm after is a kind of mirror function (without using RAID) rather than
a backup tool per se. Space
darrenyeats wrote:
From what I've read from your link, rsnapshot isn't what I want. It
seems rsnapshot is great for, erm, snapshots. But snapshots aren't
backups.
I want backups for when a disk fails, and it seems rsnapshot, by
relying on hard links, is not intended to propagate data
Mark Lanctot wrote:
Power it by C cells, although one must ask how long
they'd last given the Wi-Fi power demand - maybe a lithium ion permanent
battery might be better, and it'd be a good selling feature.
Power should be rechargeable cells - i.e. make sure it works with nx1.2v
as well as
egd wrote:
Version info as follows:
6.5.2 - 12047 - Windows Server 2003 - EN - cp1252
6.5.3 - 12232 - Debian - EN - iso-8859-1
Guess I'll update the Windows instance, do a full rescan and see
whether there are any remaining differences.
Yeah, that's probably the root cause, i.e.
elziko wrote:
It's happened twice today - once this morning and once this evening. My
new SB3 just suddenly came out of standby and started playing music.
I have no alarms defined when I look at my player settings in
Slimserver (SlimServer_6.5_v2007-06-06).
I have no other infrared
JJZolx wrote:
Is there any chance that those of use who have Slim Devices branded
components could avoid having them retroactively branded Logitech by
new firmware and software? Use a serial number, MAC address...
something.
Are you really *that* bothered?
R.
NauticusLX wrote:
A wireless connection is almost always better, logistically, than a
wired one, even if the sound quality is compromised - the extent to
which is always subjective. The point is, a wireless hookup is
possible, and desireable, for the individual who asked, so let's not
Peter wrote:
325xi wrote:
I know this subject has already been discussed to death, but I couldn't
find an answer on this particular question - are there any advantages
of ripping CD to separate tracks? SB seems to handle images with cue
sheets very well, and such images are actually easier to
101 - 200 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
