Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread ModelCitizen
Jim, thanks for your useful reply. I have given up attemptimng anything with SqueezeSlave for two reasons: 1) It's volume output is extremely low (almost inaudible) 2) When synced it causes my other players to stop emitting any sound whatsoever (even though to all intents and purposes they

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread JJZolx
ModelCitizen;280251 Wrote: Jim, thanks for your useful reply. I have given up attemptimng anything with SqueezeSlave for two reasons: 1) It's volume output is extremely low (almost inaudible) I've never noticed this. Seems to be about the same as Softsqueeze to me. 2) When synced

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread Zaragon
As JJZolx has corrected the suggested command I thought I'd just add for anyone else that in general, for windows, if a filename or a directory name contains spaces then you have to place the whole string within double quotes. Otherwise the spaces look like separators between a command an its

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread hunta
The version of SoftSqueeze I have (3.2.1?) also installs SoftSqueezeHeadless.exe. I just have a shortcut to that in my start-up folder. Simple as that, and works perfectly with SqueezeCenter. I'm not even sure that Java is running as it has no graphical interface. Sorry, possibly missing the

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread ModelCitizen
hunta;280292 Wrote: Sorry, possibly missing the point as that seems a bit too straightforward a solution. Yup, I want it to run as a service, i.e. to run without me being logged in at the computer. MC -- ModelCitizen Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. It's the

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread ModelCitizen
JJZolx;280264 Wrote: Try: C:\INSTSRV SoftSqueeze C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\srvany.exe I followed your instructions and a service was created that called C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\srvany.exe, not softsqueezeHeadless.exe as it should. I've corrected the

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread ModelCitizen
Hmmm.. this is not working. I seems so simple too that it's hard to see what could be wrong. I uninstalled the service, and installed it again. The dos texxt: C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\ToolsInstsrv SoftSqueeze C:\Program Files\Softsqueeze\softsqueezeHeadless.exe The service was

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Bowes
ModelCitizen wrote: Hello, In my quest for true whole-house audio it's struck me that I need a Windows-based low footprint player, integrated with SlimCenter, that does not show on my PC (is this headless?). I only need to control it via the SlimCenter web interface and the jive controller.

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread ModelCitizen
Robin Bowes;280309 Wrote: Er, colour me stupid but, it sounds to me like you need another Squeezebox! Somehow it would feel a bit wasteful to run one in my study, right next to my computer. :-) MC -- ModelCitizen Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. It's the music,

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread Zaragon
ModelCitizen;280295 Wrote: I followed your instructions and a service was created that called C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\srvany.exe, not softsqueezeHeadless.exe as it should. I've corrected the path in the regsitry but the service won't start. I'm about to delete the

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-16 Thread JJZolx
ModelCitizen;280295 Wrote: I followed your instructions and a service was created that called C:\Program Files\Windows Resource Kits\Tools\srvany.exe, not softsqueezeHeadless.exe as it should. I've corrected the path in the regsitry but the service won't start. I'm about to delete the

[slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread ModelCitizen
Hello, In my quest for true whole-house audio it's struck me that I need a Windows-based low footprint player, integrated with SlimCenter, that does not show on my PC (is this headless?). I only need to control it via the SlimCenter web interface and the jive controller. Softsqueeze appears no

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread ModelCitizen
Hmmm.. should have actually tried Squeezeslave before posting this... I get a very, very low volume sound and the dos box reads: Output devices: 0: Primary Sound Driver 1: DMX 6fire Wave 2: Primary Sound Capture Driver 3: DMX 6fire Wave PortAudio on DirectSound - Latency = 5376 frames, 121 msec

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread Peter
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:49:35 -0700, ModelCitizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hello, In my quest for true whole-house audio it's struck me that I need a Windows-based low footprint player, integrated with SlimCenter, that does not show on my PC (is this headless?). I only need to control it via

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread ModelCitizen
Thanks for your reply Peter but all you advise is a bit over the top for me. * Run Softqueeze ( java - unnecessary permanent overhead. Do not want graphic interface either) * Run VNC (I only have one permanently on PC, it runs SlimCenter? Now I want it to be an audio source too) * Run a Linux

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread JJZolx
You can run squeezeslave.exe as a service on Windows. I do this on my work PC. First, you'll need the Windows Resource Kit Tools for XP/Win2k3. Download it 'here' (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9D467A69-57FF-4AE7-96EE-B18C4790CFFDdisplaylang=en). (Despite the page

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread Peter
ModelCitizen wrote: Thanks for your reply Peter but all you advise is a bit over the top for me. * Run Softqueeze ( java - unnecessary permanent overhead. Do not want graphic interface either) You have a PC dedicated for this stuff? What PC, bought in the last 5 years, is incapable of

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread ModelCitizen
Peter;279910 Wrote: You have a PC dedicated for this stuff? What PC, bought in the last 5 years, is incapable of running SoftSqueeze/Java and Squeezecenter simultaneously? No I don't. I have one PC (as stated above) that is always on. This is my deskop machine and a SlimCenter server. Of

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread Peter
ModelCitizen wrote: Peter;279910 Wrote: You have a PC dedicated for this stuff? What PC, bought in the last 5 years, is incapable of running SoftSqueeze/Java and Squeezecenter simultaneously? No I don't. I have one PC (as stated above) that is always on. This is my deskop machine

Re: [slim] Low footprint integrated headless player required

2008-03-15 Thread robbin
ModelCitizen;279992 Wrote: I think the confusion comes from my use of the word headless. I was referring to using Softsqueeze in headless mode (See title headless player). I was hoping that this meant using it without any sort of graphical interfaceI think SoftSqueeze will do what you want.