Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-23 Thread ajkidle
Thanks everybody, it's working like a dream. -- ajkidle 2x SBR, SB3, Boom, Radio, iPeng ajkidle's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18929 View this thread:

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread ajkidle
pski;538236 Wrote: Don't be confused by the difference between the internet connection and the router's IP assignment: your connections will be going out on u-verse and the wires plugged-into the netgear will NOT be plugged-into the different internet port. This didn't work, but I

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread JJZolx
ajkidle;538390 Wrote: Are you saying I should have plugged the ethernet into one of the 1-4 ports on the Netgear? (Methinks standard routers should come with more than 4 ports.) Yes. What he's trying to describe is using the Netgear router as a simple 'access point' instead of as a

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread sfraser
You might run into a issue using the Netgear as a AP with DHCP turned off. Sometimes in this scenario the AP will not forward the DHCP query correctly. If this is the case using static ip address's maybe an alternative. -- sfraser 2 Chan. System SB3-Benchmark DAC-1- Bryston(BP-25,3B)-PMC TB2

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread ajkidle
Let me throw in one additional wrinkle. Due to the physical constraints of the house, it may be necessary to add a switch to this setup. Wondering if such a network design is horribly flawed. The connections would be: U-Verse Gateway -- Netgear Router (configured as an access point) --

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread JJZolx
ajkidle;538645 Wrote: Let me throw in one additional wrinkle. No sense getting into wrinkles until you get the above to work. :) Due to the physical constraints of the house, it may be necessary to add a switch to this setup. Wondering if such a network design is horribly flawed. The

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-21 Thread pablolie
My setup is just like that. I have ATT Uverse, but have disabled wireless on the Uverse box. I use a Linksys WRT610N as an AP. I merely disable the DHCP functionality on the latter and assign it a address outside of the Uverse boxes DHCP range, yet inside the network mask. Works without any

[slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-20 Thread ajkidle
I have ATT U-Verse service. Their gateway acts as an 100 Mbps ethernet and wireless-G router, I don't particularly care for this so I have the disabled the wireless on the gateway and have my Netgear 3500L plugged into it. Works great, mostly. I'm still using the U-Verse gateway as a wired

Re: [slim] Network Architecture Question

2010-04-20 Thread pski
ajkidle;538230 Wrote: I have ATT U-Verse service. Their gateway acts as an 100 Mbps ethernet and wireless-G router, I don't particularly care for this so I have the disabled the wireless on the gateway and have my Netgear 3500L plugged into it. Works great, mostly. I'm still using the