Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-03 Thread Jac
Update: After 5 days of extensive using I can pretty much relate my 3 issues to a faulty Linksys Router/switch/AP (Logitceh Quality Control not to be blamed.this time :)). My new Gateway is a Linksys WAG54G2. Even the intermittent Album artwork not being updated is now fineStrange? but

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-03 Thread Ptaku
After I uppdate to 7.3.3 when I start upp mine SB3 with internet radio and then I start mine computer , internet radio stops to play !! On display I get lose internet connection , then I have to star it again... I change back to 7.3.2 and this problem is gone.. -- Ptaku

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-03 Thread pablolie
i would not label 7.3.3 the worst user experience, but sadly it seems to indicate lack of focus on the squeezebox concept. it seems somewhat untested, with occasional unnerving behavior (like failing to start this morning on my utterly stable Vista Ultimate 64 PC, claiming some perl.dll module or

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-02 Thread Phil Leigh
Declan Moriarty;436678 Wrote: One problem why dynamic IP Addresses can possibly be difficult using the SqueezeBox products is that SqueezeBox doesn't use DNS! I have 2 PC's. Both have different computer names. I refer to them using the names not the IP Addresses. My firewall uses the

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-01 Thread Declan Moriarty
jo-wie;436692 Wrote: It's not very common to have a Domain Name Server in a home network installation. Your provider DNS do not know the local names. It's possible that your systems support resolving host names by using Microsoft NetBios protocol, but that's not supported by every system.

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-01 Thread radish
Declan Moriarty;437084 Wrote: Note that my brother inlaw has a Belkin router that displays the name of his laptop. This implies that the router is operating a local DNS. Those names are typically taken from the hostname field in the DHCP handshake. SBs populate that field with the player

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-07-01 Thread Nonreality
pfarrell;436776 Wrote: rfreedman wrote: This is known as Static DHCP, and I can confirm that it works quite well in this situation. I do this on all the things in my house. All my laptops, squeezeboxes, transporter, etc. I do leave normal DHCP available for an occasional guest who

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-30 Thread gbruzzo
jhd;436591 Wrote: Is it possible to give an SB1 a static IP? If so, how? you could maybe thread a middle ground, that is leave DHCP on but reserve certain addresses (via your Router's network page) to the MACs of your SB devices. I do this on my DG834N (btw: what a piece of of a router -

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-30 Thread Declan Moriarty
One problem why dynamic IP Addresses can possibly be difficult using the SqueezeBox products is that SqueezeBox doesn't use DNS! I have 2 PC's. Both have different computer names. I refer to them using the names not the IP Addresses. My firewall uses the name of my 2nd PC NOT its IP address.

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-30 Thread jo-wie
Declan Moriarty;436678 Wrote: One problem why dynamic IP Addresses can possibly be difficult using the SqueezeBox products is that SqueezeBox doesn't use DNS! I have 2 PC's. Both have different computer names. I refer to them using the names not the IP Addresses. My firewall uses the

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-30 Thread rfreedman
gbruzzo;436630 Wrote: you could maybe thread a middle ground, that is leave DHCP on but reserve certain addresses (via your Router's network page) to the MACs of your SB devices. I do this on my DG834N (btw: what a piece of of a router - it went berserk once I upgraded its firmware to

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-30 Thread Pat Farrell
rfreedman wrote: This is known as Static DHCP, and I can confirm that it works quite well in this situation. I do this on all the things in my house. All my laptops, squeezeboxes, transporter, etc. I do leave normal DHCP available for an occasional guest who brings their own laptop. I highly

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-29 Thread Jeff52
maggior;436230 Wrote: If that doesn't work for you, you could give 7.2.1 a spin. I found that to be quite stable. I have also had issues (different than yours) with 7.3.3. I agree with the 7.2.1 recommendation. -- Jeff52

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-29 Thread Jac
OK, An update, this morning my Linksys (DSL/wireless/router) died on me. It would no longer connect DSL, DHCP went dead and I could no longer access it via web browser. The switching still seemed to work, so it seems that the Linksys was close to the end. So..maybe..hopefully this

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-29 Thread jrichardson
Jac;436199 Wrote: But since my upgrade to 7.3.3 things are going downhill, the problems are frustrating and intermittent: 1. after a while my controller no longer shows the artwork of albums. Everything is still working, I can choose, play, stop music. It will show some of the

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-29 Thread HectorHughMunro
Jac;436399 Wrote: OK, An update, this morning my Linksys (DSL/wireless/router) died on me. It would no longer connect DSL, DHCP went dead and I could no longer access it via web browser. The switching still seemed to work, so it seems that the Linksys was close to the end.

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-29 Thread jhd
Is it possible to give an SB1 a static IP? If so, how? -- jhd jhd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2235 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=65021

[slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-28 Thread Jac
In my struggle to get a stable setup with my duet (2 players) and boombox I went a long way and made improvements. I now have a dedicated Linux (Ubunto) music server. every device is connecting to 1 access point (vs 2AP in the past). Music is 15 000 FLAC songs on 1000 albums tagging has all

Re: [slim] user experience with 7.3.3 = worst

2009-06-28 Thread maggior
Did you encounter any errors during the upgrade to 7.3.3? Based on your comment, it sounds like you upgraded from 7.3.2. You might try uninstalling 7.3.3 completely and reinstalling. In addition to uninstalling the package, ensure that the directories are all empty