If your library is 100k tracks, I suggest 2+gb of ram.
doctor_big's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15196
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103069
Mnyb wrote:
Maybe time has moved one and everything is aviable for the arm
architecture ?
Personally, I'm still on the fence on this one. Sure, for a client, ARM
is the way to go. But for a server, it's more difficult.
On x86, Atom is an option that's certainly on par or better
My pow .
Use something x86 based ,use internal SATA drive one separate drive for
the OS ( not just its own partition ) other drives for the music . The
OS drive can be an SSD .
Use vortexbox or some linux OS on your own , preferably annOS wihtout
Desktop ( GUI ) a server OS . You will admin it
I have been using an Arm QNAP NAS for some years but I am currently in
the process of converting to a Vortexbox running on an old Dell Server
but with the files still stored on the NAS via NFS mount. Scan speed is
about twice as fast on the Dell as it is on the QNAP but the Dell
doesn't have the
Uliver wrote:
Is this c70 powerful enough?
I don't know the benchmark scores on top of my head. However, keep in
mind that this is essentially AMD's answer to Intel's Atom platform. And
AMD's strong suit is graphics which is irrelevant for running Logitech
Media Server. On the other hand,
Hmm your doing, just what I'm looking to move to.
Any benefit to an nfs share rather than samba?
Transporter (Lounge)
Touch (Office)
Touch (Kitchen)
Radio (Bedroom)
Radio (Garage)
SqueezePlay 7.8 on 2 x Windows 7 PCs
LMS 7.7.3 on DIY UnRaid NAS now upgraded to 7.8 (06/01/2015)
Squeeze user
markiii wrote:
Hmm your doing, just what I'm looking to move to.
Any benefit to an nfs share rather than samba?
Yes. NFS is much faster.
Hacking the Vortexbox (2.3) install was really quite easy.
The QNAP folder /share/Qmultimedia is still available via Samba as well
for windows clients.
Hi,
You don't need much cpu power to run LMS. Especially not if you use
flac, since flac is natively supported by all squeezeboxes. If you use
not natively supported file formats, you need cpupower for transcoding
of lms. Also if you play resolutions that are not supported, for example
24/96 on a
Hello,
I want to set up a low cost,low energy computer to run squeeze-center
Having 5 squeezeboxes at home.
What will still run this fluidly?
asrock-c70m1 with amd c70 cpu with 4 gb ram
will this work is better to take a stronger option?
thanks for the ideas
Uliver
Uliver wrote:
Hello,
I want to set up a low cost,low energy computer to run squeeze-center
Having 5 squeezeboxes at home.
What will still run this fluidly?
asrock-c70m1 with amd c70 cpu with 4 gb ram
will this work is better to take a stronger option?
thanks for the ideas
Uliver
Looks
thanx for the ideas
But maybe i should ask different
What cpu power do i need to run it fast and error free
I play most songs as flac and that results in large files and libery
Is this c70 powerful enough?
Uliver's
Hi,
I have a cubietruck with a 2 TB Harddisk for 5 Boxes. Works perfectly as
server and player and is very low on energy.
Greets
Chris
chrissy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47801
View this
Uliver wrote:
Hello,
I want to set up a low cost,low energy computer to run squeeze-center
Having 5 squeezeboxes at home.
What will still run this fluidly?
asrock-c70m1 with amd c70 cpu with 4 gb ram
will this work is better to take a stronger option?
thanks for the ideas
Uliver
Why not
callesoroe wrote:
Why not buy a used ReadyNas Ultra/pro ? Much easier and runs
perfectly. Then your LMS is always there and you can set timer in the
ReadyNas to stop/start.
i never tried to use a nas.
when i wanted to buy one a few years ago i was told it was better to
use
a pc system.
14 matches
Mail list logo
