Cheers all.
Both the Muse and the Audio source fit tag bill perfectly. I'll see if I
can track one down
Btw , just to clear up any confusion I meant a Logitech Receiver. By
using two wireless routers as wireless repeaters I've managed to
successfully extend my wireless network over a good
sklep ybprinting com]Obrabiarki
Tesheetly's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=57232
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96377
jimbobvfr400 wrote:
Hi
I'm having a weird problem using squeezecommander on my HTC Desire Z
when connecting via 3G
I have a dyndns.org hostname, and I have configured my router to forward
port 9001 to my server correctly (I'm using port 9001 as I use 9000 for
Twonky)
Now I can
9000 (or 9001, in this case) is enough for SqueezeCommander
A player would also need 3483.
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread:
pallfreeman wrote:
The last few posts have got me wondering... what are the most expensive
and/or upmarket products that Logitech have sold? Are other things being
EOL'ed?
I'd somehow be happier if I thought they were cutting all of their
high-end products, rather than targeting SBs.
erland wrote:
They have high-end products in pretty much every market segment they
have products in. It of course depends on what you mean with high-end
but mass market users definitely doesn't get a keyboard for $179, a
mouse for $99, a universal remote for $349 or in-ear head phones for
pippin wrote:
9000 (or 9001, in this case) is enough for SqueezeCommander
A player would also need 3483.
OK , thats true for any player I assume ?
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
erland wrote:
They have high-end products in pretty much every market segment they
have products in. It of course depends on what you mean with high-end
but mass market users definitely doesn't get a keyboard for $179, a
mouse for $99, a universal remote for $349 or in-ear head phones for
Over my morning coffee, perusing the latest posts, I've been thinking
about all the discussions recently that focus in some manner on trying
to predict future Logitech actions. Can be interesting reading of
course, but I've decided to focus my seeing the future skills on
predicting the stock
pallfreeman wrote:
Bang goes my theory then. The drowning man clutching at straws, or
something like that. They *are* targeting SBs.
At first I thought you were joking about the $2K headphones. Made me
smile until I saw it was for real. Thanks.
Universal Ears (UE) was a well respected
garym wrote:
Over my morning coffee, perusing the latest posts, I've been thinking
about all the discussions recently that focus in some manner on trying
to predict future Logitech actions. Can be interesting reading of
course, but I've decided to focus my seeing the future skills on
pallfreeman wrote:
Bang goes my theory then. The drowning man clutching at straws, or
something like that. They *are* targeting SBs.
At first I thought you were joking about the $2K headphones. Made me
smile until I saw it was for real. Thanks.
they are not necessarily targeting SBs.
garym wrote:
Over my morning coffee, perusing the latest posts, I've been thinking
about all the discussions recently that focus in some manner on trying
to predict future Logitech actions. Can be interesting reading of
course, but I've decided to focus my seeing the future skills on
agree. My post was a poor attempt at sarcasm. I certainly think it
would be crazy to try trade on seeing the future of the stock market.
Just like I think it is a waste of time to try to predict Logitech's
future actions. I suspect even Logitech management doesn't have more
than a short-term
Mnyb wrote:
Universal Ears (UE) was a well respected high end brand for this kind of
stuff before Logitech bought them
It's Ultimate Ears ;-). They do custom in-ear monitors for pro
musicians. Only a few days ago I noticed this picture posted by bassist
'Tony Levin '
Now that the Squeezebox line is gone, and its replacement doesn't even
have a digital output, I'm in semi-panic mode. What happens if my three
year old Duet dies? Can it be repaired? By Logitech? If I buy a Touch
as a backup, can that be repaired?
bertdw wrote:
Now that the Squeezebox line is gone, and its replacement doesn't even
have a digital output, I'm in semi-panic mode. What happens if my three
year old Duet dies? Can it be repaired? By Logitech? If I buy a Touch
as a backup, can that be repaired?
Based on other posts on
mherger wrote:
It's Ultimate Ears ;-). They do custom in-ear monitors for pro
musicians. Only a few days ago I noticed this picture posted by bassist
'Tony Levin ' (http://www.papabear.com/tours/pg12/pg12_1.htm) from
rehearsals with Peter Gabriel:
[image:
+1 We got almost no real info at all , speculating treads eventually
starts to generate their own facts ,so good advice to not waste more
energy on this until some more shreds of real info surfaces...
Mnyb's Profile:
Thanks for your quick reply. So you think the Touch is more reliable
than the Duet? Mine has never given me any trouble. At first I thought
at least I'd have a new warranty with a new Touch, but if they only gave
me a coupon for something else, forget it!
garym wrote:
agree. My post was a poor attempt at sarcasm. I certainly think it
would be crazy to try trade on seeing the future of the stock market.
Just like I think it is a waste of time to try to predict Logitech's
future actions. I suspect even Logitech management doesn't have more
SlimChances wrote:
Erland You said in an earlier post on this thread Squeezebox
Classic/Boom/Transporter/Receiver all load their firmware via the local
LMS, so for these there aren't any issue to load the firmware you like
and they don't force mysqueezebox.com registration.
Does this mean
SlimChances wrote:
Erland You said in an earlier post on this thread Squeezebox
Classic/Boom/Transporter/Receiver all load their firmware via the local
LMS, so for these there aren't any issue to load the firmware you like
and they don't force mysqueezebox.com registration.
Does this mean
That's good as most of my players are the older style Classic and SB3
players. I will be following these threads on how to prepare for the
eventuality that LMS and MySqueezebox.com are no longer supported, with
interest. It may be a couple of years or it may be sooner but it is
inevitable .
th00ht wrote:
Buy now! It can only go up, can't it?
That's only real estate and Apple stock. ;-p (more sarcasm)
garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325
View this thread:
bertdw wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply. So you think the Touch is more reliable
than the Duet? Mine has never given me any trouble. At first I thought
at least I'd have a new warranty with a new Touch, but if they only gave
me a coupon for something else, forget it!
No, I think the
bertdw wrote:
Now that the Squeezebox line is gone, and its replacement doesn't even
have a digital output, I'm in semi-panic mode. What happens if my three
year old Duet dies? Can it be repaired? By Logitech? If I buy a Touch
as a backup, can that be repaired?
First of all, why worry
garym wrote:
No, I think the duet is just as reliable at the TOUCH (maybe more so, as
there is no screen to go out). My point was that the duet receiver has
been discontinued for several years (so none would exist in inventory
for replacement). The TOUCH is still being sold by Amazon, and
mherger wrote:
It's Ultimate Ears ;-). They do custom in-ear monitors for pro
musicians. Only a few days ago I noticed this picture posted by bassist
'Tony Levin ' (http://www.papabear.com/tours/pg12/pg12_1.htm) from
rehearsals with Peter Gabriel:
Much respect here for Peter Gabriel, but
Yes. SBs also need UDP on 3483, I believe. SqueezePlayer, iPeng et al
are fine with only TCP, though
pippin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13777
View this thread:
pallfreeman wrote:
Much respect here for Peter Gabriel, but if they're the kinda folk
Logitech want to sell to, wouldn't they be better off acquiring Phonak?
Was that a slam on us older folks with hearing aids? Or is it because
Phonak hearing aids are one of the more geeky ones that users can
I use a class t-amp from think geek (omni products, dayton ) in my
garage with a receiver as a source.
Simple on off and volume, even battery power (!?)
It works and takes up minimal room ( 5X5X2). Must use efficient
speakers.
mark
garym wrote:
Over my morning coffee, perusing the latest posts, I've been thinking
about all the discussions recently that focus in some manner on trying
to predict future Logitech actions. Can be interesting reading of
course, but I've decided to focus my seeing the future skills on
It sounds so easy just connecting the music pc to the AP and that is
that :-) done!
So yes I think I will go with this easy solution
unless I feel lucky and wanting to wasting a good few evenings of
frustration messing about with 2 ethernet cards in one machine ;-)
Thanks for all the
gruntwolla wrote:
That's easy. Put everything on Logitech stock. With their markrting
expertise they're gonna sell millions of UE's ..
What's a UE?
pallfreeman's Profile:
pallfreeman wrote:
What's a UE?
http://ue.logitech.com/en-gb/smart-radios
http://ue.logitech.com/en-gb/headphones
http://ue.logitech.com/en-gb/wireless-speakers
Please tell me that was an attempt at sarcasm
I haven't tried the UE up/downgrade route ... but from what I've read
understand the UE Radio route seems a smart move by Logi. It seems
they've simplified the user experience, both in terms of getting up and
running and use. This just reflects the reality of the general user
ecosystem -
Ok,
So I haven't been on these forums in ages...
I came back and it seems everyone is talking about the start of the end,
and it looks like the standard squeezebox devices have disappeared from
the logitech website!
What is going on!
I really like my squeezebox classic and love all the
lambono wrote:
Agh! When did this (end of SqueezeBox) start??
Late 2006.
Mark Miksis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96391
It was announced 8/29. Or rather, LogitechUE was announced. The only
mention of Squeezebox was the statement that the company would still
support LMS and mysb.com. They have retained the Radio, although the new
software focuses on ease of use vs flexibility/functionality.
Mark Miksis wrote:
Late 2006.
Brilliant!
lambono, check out this thread for the details:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?96188-New-Squeezebox-Radio
ajkidle's Profile:
Eh. I'd bite at $500, as a back up to my current TP.
SamS's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9261
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=96357
On my wish list I would like the squeezebox to support Audible books so
I could read audible books.
oilman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=57244
View this thread:
pallfreeman wrote:
No, what I said was that Logitech have been encouraging use of their
official forum since day 1, which is incorrect.
The quoute was verbatim from one of your posts in this thread.
pallfreeman wrote:
Very fair point, but is it not a case of Logitech turning their backs on
lambono wrote:
Is this really the beginning of the end? When did logitech decide to
move away for the squeezebox/touch devices?
The following post summarize the situation:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?96188-New-Squeezebox-Radiop=714295viewfull=1#post714295
It is based on the 7.8 branch Jul 17, 2012 git check in which I've
exported back to subversion as I really dislike git.
What a pity (but trust me: git and I aren't friends yet either :-)). How
much of a patch would this be to be merged back?
--
Michael
If the audio book is on CD you can just rip it like any other CD and
play it back through your Squeezebox player from your Squeezebox server
(LMS). If your audio book is already a MP3 you can just put it in your
current Squeezebox server folder, scan for new and updated and then play
it back
47 matches
Mail list logo
